Talk » Financing » Discussing 'Coming HELOC crisis.'
 

SAVE    RSS Coming HELOC crisis.

<< first    < prev       217 comments  -   page of 3        next >    
Ignored comment. Unhide

1)Ending Fannie & Freddie makes sense, as it removes the incentive to have industry lobby to make the old GSE'S dumping grounds.
2)Assuming the securitization market comes back add a requirement that Moody's , S&P, Fitch be required to audit loans to make sure they are as advertised.
3) Hold mortgage brokers to a "know your customer rule" requiring them to make reccomendations for loans commensurate with the stated risk profile of the borrower, similar to what happens when John & Jane Doe open up a brokerage account at Merrill Lynch
4) Require mortgage insurers treat the business like real insurers by forcing them to reserve against losses and forbidding them from walking after the loan goes south. The time to make sure the loan was properly underwritten is not five years after the fact
5) Require Full doc loans, even if the loan is granted based on other than full doc criteria. No hiding of income or lying about it
6) End the preferential capital requirements the gov't places on mortgage debt over other types of debt
7) End the mortgage deduction

RS,

Agree w/all except 2 and 7. They should "destroy" the securitization machine, period! Without a conduit, there is no need to feed the machine with mortgages. Without this need, there is no incentives to write up any and all mortgages, i.e., if you breath, you get a loan. Like today, lending standard automagically tightens. No demand for mortgages to feed the machine, no need to fire up the "robo-signing!"

End the mortgage deduction for 2nd homes and only allow mortgage deduction on 1st homes and fixed-rate mortgages. By "definition" the various flavors of ARMS already is reducing the owner's burden of the monthly payment, why is the owner getting an extra "kick" for interest deduction ? ARMs are favorite of the "speculators" Home owners, for the most part, takes out fixed-rate mortgages, and especially in today's environment where the differential between front and long-end of the curve is not huge, it makes even more sense than an ARM.

str33teasier,
If one properly there's nothing wrong with securitization.

> If one properly there's nothing wrong with securitization.

securitization, the mechanism, by itself is fine as you said and I completely agree. However, like a computer program, garbage-in (NINJA loans, Neg-ARMs, Op-ARMs, etc), garbage-out (current crisis) Therefore, best to just let it rot and die of naturally death. it will surely, like day follows night, come back when folks "rediscover" the beauty of pooling and tranching and credit risk.

> he doesn't have a clue what he's talking about. That's why,

I think u nailed it brooks2

Ignored comment. Unhide
Ignored comment. Unhide

Sell everything and load up on Guns & Spaghettios!
But seriously,,.
He's arguing that stock market is not based in reality with growth slowing.

Ignored comment. Unhide

In slow motion of course...

Ignored comment. Unhide
Ignored comment. Unhide
Ignored comment. Unhide
Ignored comment. Unhide
Ignored comment. Unhide

brooks2, u r scaring natives ... LOL

<< first    < prev       217 comments  -   page of 3        next >    

Add your comment