<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Conversion of Devonshire House</title>
    <link>http://streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/12677-conversion-of-devonshire-house</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Most recent comments for Conversion of Devonshire House</description>
    <item>
      <title>30yrs_RE_20_in_REO: about 5 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;From what I heard, the insiders prices weren't much of a discount. Wilpon bought the building for $110 million and it's supposed to be 145,000SF, which puts it at over 750 a foot. I had heard that they were looking to sell for around $1700/sf. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And supposedly Wilpon lost a ton with Madoff. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/12677-conversion-of-devonshire-house?comment_id=187581</guid>
      <link>http://streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/12677-conversion-of-devonshire-house?comment_id=187581</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NWT: about 5 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;CViller, condo conversions don't have underlying mortgages.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Almost every non-eviction conversion (and they're virtually all non-evict) results in legacy tenants. Not a problem for buyers. In fact, the more units still owned by the sponsor, the lower the CCs are likely to be.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/12677-conversion-of-devonshire-house?comment_id=187577</guid>
      <link>http://streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/12677-conversion-of-devonshire-house?comment_id=187577</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>kylewest: about 5 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Without knowing the offering plan details, &quot;insider&quot; pricing, and number of units expected to become owner-occupied during the initial offering, how can you take a position or express an informed one-size-fits-all-conversions opinion?  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Certainly two things the building has going for it are (1) outstanding location, (2) gorgeous building with extensive recent facade restoration.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/12677-conversion-of-devonshire-house?comment_id=187525</guid>
      <link>http://streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/12677-conversion-of-devonshire-house?comment_id=187525</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Emrolover: about 5 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Great building, old tenants.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/12677-conversion-of-devonshire-house?comment_id=187518</guid>
      <link>http://streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/12677-conversion-of-devonshire-house?comment_id=187518</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CViller: about 5 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;28 East 10th Street or 47 University&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/12677-conversion-of-devonshire-house?comment_id=187460</guid>
      <link>http://streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/12677-conversion-of-devonshire-house?comment_id=187460</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>CViller: about 5 months ago</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;What's going on with this building?
&lt;br /&gt;It is Emery Roth.
&lt;br /&gt;But why would someone buy into a conversion where for the next several decades there'll be legacy tenants and probably high mortgage maintenance?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <guid>http://streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/12677-conversion-of-devonshire-house?comment_id=187459</guid>
      <link>http://streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/12677-conversion-of-devonshire-house?comment_id=187459</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
