Skip Navigation

ericho how do these payroll numbers look?

Started by marco_m
about 16 years ago
Posts: 2481
Member since: Dec 2008
Discussion about
same old story
Response by sidelinesitter
about 16 years ago
Posts: 1596
Member since: Mar 2009

...and on the payroll day, he rested.

ericho takes bad economic news days off. didn't you know that?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by waverly
about 16 years ago
Posts: 1638
Member since: Jul 2008

We are just not going to start adding 400,000 jobs/month from where we have been. It is going to take time and there are going to be bumps ands setbacks along the way, like going from adding 4,000 jobs in November to losing 85,000 in December.

There is still some good in this report. "Still, the payrolls report, which is viewed by most economists as the more reliable gauge of the labor market's health, suggested a broad trend toward improvement was still intact.

Professional and business services added 50,000 positions, while education and health services increased payrolls by 35,000. Temporary help employment rose by 47,000.

Manufacturing payrolls fell 27,000 after dropping 35,000 in November. The construction sector lost 53,000 jobs, while the service-providing sector shed only 4,000 workers.

The average workweek was unchanged at 33.2 hours, while average hourly earnings increased by $18.80 from $18.77 in November."

I think we will have another 6 months of ups and downs before we start to make better traction forward. Overall, certain not the best jobs report for sure, but it wasn't all terrible.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by anonymous
about 16 years ago

let's see how the stock and bond market react. initially poorly but not to bad, now the stock market is rising and long term rates are rising. nothing i like better than discounting mechanisms reacting the opposite to what one would expect. both are predicting a strong economic recovery.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by aboutready
about 16 years ago
Posts: 16354
Member since: Oct 2007
Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by ericho75
about 16 years ago
Posts: 1743
Member since: Feb 2009

I'm diappointed...but this means ONE thing.
Fed will not hike anytime soon.

Pretty bullish to me.

New highs on junk yields today!

http://finance.yahoo.com/echarts?s=JNK#chart1:symbol=jnk;range=5d;indicator=volume;charttype=line;crosshair=on;ohlcvalues=0;logscale=on;source=undefined

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by ericho75
about 16 years ago
Posts: 1743
Member since: Feb 2009

"nothing i like better than discounting mechanisms reacting the opposite to what one would expect. both are predicting a strong economic recovery."

BINGO!

Follow the money. That's the last thing the bears know how to do.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by sidelinesitter
about 16 years ago
Posts: 1596
Member since: Mar 2009

"New highs on junk yields today!"

Actually, new highs on junk PRICES today. A.k.a., new LOWS on junk yields.

That's an F in Fixed Income 101, you bucket shop clown.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by waverly
about 16 years ago
Posts: 1638
Member since: Jul 2008

AR - that is why there are going to be ups and downs as we navigate forward. It won;t be a quick turnaround, but it is getting better.

"bucket shop clown" - that is a very funny phrase!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by aboutready
about 16 years ago
Posts: 16354
Member since: Oct 2007

waverly, no. it's quit getting worse, at least for the most part. but it hasn't gotten better.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by marco_m
about 16 years ago
Posts: 2481
Member since: Dec 2008

"That's an F in Fixed Income 101, you bucket shop clown"

hahahahah

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by ericho75
about 16 years ago
Posts: 1743
Member since: Feb 2009

Oh please.
Weren't you the dumb ass that called for a 2nd wave down?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by waverly
about 16 years ago
Posts: 1638
Member since: Jul 2008

AR - No, I don't agree with you. This is what recoveries look like.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by ericho75
about 16 years ago
Posts: 1743
Member since: Feb 2009

Your mama!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by aboutready
about 16 years ago
Posts: 16354
Member since: Oct 2007

waverly, did you look at the second chart i posted? does that look like an f'ng recovery to you? does it look anything like any of the other post-war recoveries?

take a look and let me know.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by waverly
about 16 years ago
Posts: 1638
Member since: Jul 2008

Yes, it looks exactly like what I antipated the recovery to look like (okay, what many smart people believe and what I also think...I don't count with the smart people). Long way down means slow fix, but it is getting better.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by aboutready
about 16 years ago
Posts: 16354
Member since: Oct 2007

ok, waverly, i can't argue with someone who says that a slope that is still negative is a recovery.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment