Skip Navigation
StreetEasy Logo

Music Stops for Wall Street Bankers

Started by malthus
over 13 years ago
Posts: 1333
Member since: Feb 2009
Discussion about
"Wall Street's latest problem: too many bankers and not enough deals. Amid new regulation, lower profits and a dreary market for mergers and acquisitions, several banks are planning to trim investment-banking units that were built for an era of deals aplenty." http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303978104577361833023859446.html
Response by Brooks2
over 13 years ago
Posts: 2970
Member since: Aug 2011

bullish

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by sledgehammer
over 13 years ago
Posts: 899
Member since: Mar 2009

...planning to cut dozens of jobs...? Dunno how much this will impact real estate prices in NY. This is too low a number!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by JButton
over 13 years ago
Posts: 447
Member since: Sep 2011

"The squeeze on profits and the slow deals environment have made banking less fun and less fulfilling. People are asking themselves, 'is this worth it?"

bullish. they'll find a more fulfilling job and make more money

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by malthus
over 13 years ago
Posts: 1333
Member since: Feb 2009

I think it means dozens at each shop. And you could probably assume the hiring slows as well.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by notadmin
over 13 years ago
Posts: 3835
Member since: Jul 2008

no way! who dare say wall street can run well with less talent? LOVE that word "talent" they use to refer to themselves.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by MattW84
over 13 years ago
Posts: 43
Member since: Oct 2007

We are talent and you appear jealous at your own inability to afford manhatten real estate.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by uwsbeagle
over 13 years ago
Posts: 285
Member since: Feb 2012

90% of the people I know who have bought or are buying RE are not in financial services sector. I think it's ridiculous to assume Manhattan RE lives and dies by one industry. There are many careers and industries that pay well but haven't generated the headline-grabbing attention of Wall Street, for better (record bonuses 2007) or worse (TARP, etc).

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Brooks2
over 13 years ago
Posts: 2970
Member since: Aug 2011

Funny

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Brooks2
over 13 years ago
Posts: 2970
Member since: Aug 2011

Even funnier if you are a broker

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by West34
over 13 years ago
Posts: 1040
Member since: Mar 2009

Re: We are talent and you appear jealous at your own inability to afford manhatten real estate

With all that talent one would think you'd know how to spell the name of the city you live in

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by caonima
over 13 years ago
Posts: 815
Member since: Apr 2010

the music hasn't stopped for manhattan RE, flippers are still enjoying free housing

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Tomnevers
over 13 years ago
Posts: 97
Member since: Mar 2012

My bank has been laying off people the entire month. It ain't pretty, and bonuses are never coming back. I don't understand how anyone in his right mind could say finance bonuses don't have a huge influence on property values in this city.

Just last week former UBS Chairman Grubel said Credit Suisse's investment bank employed 5K too many people. You can probably assume a similar number for UBS. Morgan, Goldman, etc etc these firms need to reduce compensation expense - they all employ too many people and the cuts will definitely hit NYC-based departments.

Employment going down. Bonuses going down.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by uwsbeagle
over 13 years ago
Posts: 285
Member since: Feb 2012

Wall Street was never gonna be the same in 1987 or 1994 either. The world as we knew it had changed! Never underestimate the ability of the industry to re-invent itself. Nevertheless, my point is that looking at RE through the lens of only ONE industry doesn't paint a full picture of what may be happening in other sectors of the NYC economy.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment