Talk » Anything » Discussing 'Futile attempt to evade mansion tax'
 

SAVE    RSS Futile attempt to evade mansion tax

15 comments

This is a good one, quicker to read than to describe: http://decisions.courts.state.ny.us/ad3/decisions/2012/512527.pdf

They might have had a chance if the units had been listed separately, but that was never the case. This one looks pretty open-and-shut.

good try but the fact that it was listed together and had a single kitchen probably did them in. was worth a shot since they didn't have to pay the interest/penalties.

No penalties but lawyers' fee, aggravation and bad blood with IRS.

>>>>>No penalties but lawyers' fee

HE is the lawyer.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Apartments don't have Certificates of Occupancy; buildings do.

Combos haven't required a new CofO since 1997.

Ignored comment. Unhide

You need a permit from the Department of Buildings. It'll say "blah blah combination of apartments blah blah no change in use, occupancy or egress." DoB doesn't itself keep track of number of units in a co-op. Department of Finance supposedly does, for comparing buildings, figuring taxes, and I think other things, but they seem to keep using old records. E.g., they have my building at 100, but it's been 80-something for years.

I combined 3 co-op units - two horizontally and one vertically - and the DoB literally said what NWT said they would even though there were 3 kitchens for a while. Of which I kept 2 because I'm renting out 1 unit. The co-op just added shares/maint.

Ignored comment. Unhide

yikes - cash

He gave it a good fight, 3 appeals. As West81st said it seemed pretty cut and dry though I guess they felt they had a compelling argument should they get snagged. Interesting that it is based on usage and not the technicality of ownership/purchase circumstances.

Keith Burkhardt
TBG

Ignored comment. Unhide

yikes, not always... Got major DoB involvement installing the stairs between the floors, abandoned the idea and never looked back.

15 comments

Add your comment