40% decline on the way according to experts. If they are half right 20%.
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by The_President
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 2412
Member since: Jun 2009
In real estate, there is no such thing as an "expert."
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by LuchiasDream
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 311
Member since: Apr 2009
I guess we shall see GoingDown but hey if they're right, you could not have picked a better screen name :) I'm looking forward to seeing the 2nd quarter numbers.
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by w67thstreet
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 9003
Member since: Dec 2008
ditto on 2nd qtr... can't wait...
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by nyc10022
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 9868
Member since: Aug 2008
remember, 2nd quarter volumes are still down significantly....
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by manhattanfox
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 1275
Member since: Sep 2007
3yr lag to trough.... fall 2011?
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by Rhino86
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 4925
Member since: Sep 2006
I like that -58% figure to return to the price to income ratio of the late 1990s.
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by 30yrs_RE_20_in_REO
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 9897
Member since: Mar 2009
"In real estate, there is no such thing as an "expert." "
I hope to meet you some day in Bankruptcy Court and prove you wrong.
David Goldsmith
Expert Witness, US Bankruptcy Court - Southern District of New York
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by Rhino86
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 4925
Member since: Sep 2006
Wow, a tough-boy. Come by 86th & Madison and I can learn you some manners, boy.
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by The_President
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 2412
Member since: Jun 2009
expert witnesses are a total waste. It's just a way for the attorney to milk the client in uneccessary fees.
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by 30yrs_RE_20_in_REO
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 9897
Member since: Mar 2009
Sure, because attorneys profit so much off of the fees the expert witnesses charge.
So I guess on the internet we're about equal. One expert witness and one expert witless.
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by falcogold1
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 4159
Member since: Sep 2008
REO...
Touche
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by nyc10022
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 9868
Member since: Aug 2008
> "In real estate, there is no such thing as an "expert." "
Sure there is, Robert Shiller.
The problem is all the idiots who work in real estate and don't know who he is.
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by Rhino86
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 4925
Member since: Sep 2006
As far as expertise, there is a big difference between correctly predicting short term price movements and simply understanding what is cheap and what is not cheap (historical perspective). That's what 99% of the arguments on this seem to boil down to. There are some who don't seem to want to appreciate the role of a credit bubble in (real estate) asset prices circa 2003-2007.
really interesting 3 page article. see far left column and read on.
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by Rhino86
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 4925
Member since: Sep 2006
"On the coasts, yearly rents are less than 3% of purchase price and mortgage rates are 6%, so it costs twice as much to borrow money for a mortgage than it does to borrow (rent) the house itself. "
Effing bingo. Although yearly rents aren't 3%, they are more... (Yearly rents - comparable maintenances)/asking price = 3-4% in New York.
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by nyc10022
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 9868
Member since: Aug 2008
"As far as expertise, there is a big difference between correctly predicting short term price movements and simply understanding what is cheap and what is not cheap (historical perspective). That's what 99% of the arguments on this seem to boil down to. There are some who don't seem to want to appreciate the role of a credit bubble in (real estate) asset prices circa 2003-2007. "
Correct.
You don't have to be a trained chef to know you don't put your head in the oven.
40% decline on the way according to experts. If they are half right 20%.
In real estate, there is no such thing as an "expert."
I guess we shall see GoingDown but hey if they're right, you could not have picked a better screen name :) I'm looking forward to seeing the 2nd quarter numbers.
ditto on 2nd qtr... can't wait...
remember, 2nd quarter volumes are still down significantly....
3yr lag to trough.... fall 2011?
I like that -58% figure to return to the price to income ratio of the late 1990s.
"In real estate, there is no such thing as an "expert." "
I hope to meet you some day in Bankruptcy Court and prove you wrong.
David Goldsmith
Expert Witness, US Bankruptcy Court - Southern District of New York
Wow, a tough-boy. Come by 86th & Madison and I can learn you some manners, boy.
expert witnesses are a total waste. It's just a way for the attorney to milk the client in uneccessary fees.
Sure, because attorneys profit so much off of the fees the expert witnesses charge.
So I guess on the internet we're about equal. One expert witness and one expert witless.
REO...
Touche
> "In real estate, there is no such thing as an "expert." "
Sure there is, Robert Shiller.
The problem is all the idiots who work in real estate and don't know who he is.
As far as expertise, there is a big difference between correctly predicting short term price movements and simply understanding what is cheap and what is not cheap (historical perspective). That's what 99% of the arguments on this seem to boil down to. There are some who don't seem to want to appreciate the role of a credit bubble in (real estate) asset prices circa 2003-2007.
http://patrick.net/housing/crash.html
really interesting 3 page article. see far left column and read on.
"On the coasts, yearly rents are less than 3% of purchase price and mortgage rates are 6%, so it costs twice as much to borrow money for a mortgage than it does to borrow (rent) the house itself. "
Effing bingo. Although yearly rents aren't 3%, they are more... (Yearly rents - comparable maintenances)/asking price = 3-4% in New York.
"As far as expertise, there is a big difference between correctly predicting short term price movements and simply understanding what is cheap and what is not cheap (historical perspective). That's what 99% of the arguments on this seem to boil down to. There are some who don't seem to want to appreciate the role of a credit bubble in (real estate) asset prices circa 2003-2007. "
Correct.
You don't have to be a trained chef to know you don't put your head in the oven.