NY Times Real Estate:
Started by steveF
about 17 years ago
Posts: 2319
Member since: Mar 2008
Discussion about
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/02/realestate/commercial/02sqft.html?_r=1&ref=realestate Q. Some in the industry see similarities between where we were back in the ’90s and where we are today. Do you? A. We came into the ’90s having lost over 7 million square feet of major tenants. Exxon moved out; Mobil moved out. We don’t have million-square-foot tenants moving out today. Also, we had 21... [more]
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/02/realestate/commercial/02sqft.html?_r=1&ref=realestate Q. Some in the industry see similarities between where we were back in the ’90s and where we are today. Do you? A. We came into the ’90s having lost over 7 million square feet of major tenants. Exxon moved out; Mobil moved out. We don’t have million-square-foot tenants moving out today. Also, we had 21 million square feet of new construction in the early ’90s, where now we have less than a million and a half square feet. So we had much greater space overhang in the early ’90s, and it took Manhattan five to six years to absorb all that space and then to grow. Now what’s the same: there was an influx of foreign buyers, and we are seeing it once again. There isn’t a single day that goes by here that we are not getting calls from or meeting with people from Korea, Germany, China, the Middle East. They are showing up and saying, This is a good moment to stake our claim in Manhattan real estate. [less]
Broker hypes market: man bites dog
Everyone forgets about the tremendous amount of new residential construction/conversions in the mid-late 80s that needed 5 years to be absorbed.
Not unlike the tremendous amount of new condo construction over the last few years that will take another 5 years to absorb?