Skip Navigation

Gold, or Real Estate?

Started by stevejhx
about 16 years ago
Posts: 12656
Member since: Feb 2008
Discussion about
Dec. 7 (Bloomberg) -- Gold’s best year in three decades has yet to match the returns of an interest-bearing checking account for anyone who bought the most malleable of metals coveted for at least 5,000 years during the last peak in January, 1980. Investors who paid $850 an ounce back then earned 44 percent as gold reached a record $1,226.56 on Dec. 3 in London. The Standard & Poor’s 500... [more]
Response by cfranch
about 16 years ago
Posts: 270
Member since: Feb 2009

Gold going to be a great short for the nimble trader next few days. DZZ is the triple short etf to play here.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by alanhart
about 16 years ago
Posts: 12397
Member since: Feb 2007

But they're not making any more gold.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by polydoa
about 16 years ago
Posts: 152
Member since: Feb 2009

err... gold is not made... it is "found"

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by stevejhx
about 16 years ago
Posts: 12656
Member since: Feb 2008

And there's plenty of it in the world's largest gold mine - the vault under the Federal Reserve in downtown Manhattan.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by stevejhx
about 16 years ago
Posts: 12656
Member since: Feb 2008

"gold is not made"

Don't tell that to the real estate alchemists who live on this board.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NYCMatt
about 16 years ago
Posts: 7523
Member since: May 2009

This is all well and good, but you can't LIVE in gold.

Your housing dollar is your housing dollar, not your "investment" dollar.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by alanhart
about 16 years ago
Posts: 12397
Member since: Feb 2007

He loves only gold,
Only gold.
He loves gold.
He loves only gold,
Only gold.
He loves gold.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Squid
about 16 years ago
Posts: 1399
Member since: Sep 2008

>>But they're not making any more gold.<<

They're not making any more land either.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by truthskr10
about 16 years ago
Posts: 4088
Member since: Jul 2009

Battery park wasn't created by god. ;)

And of course the moving tectonic plates do create more land e.g. patagonia but not anytime soon in nyc.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by glamma
about 16 years ago
Posts: 830
Member since: Jun 2009
Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10023
about 16 years ago
Posts: 7614
Member since: Nov 2008

Gold mines, my friends.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by alanhart
about 16 years ago
Posts: 12397
Member since: Feb 2007

No they're not. We are.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by stevejhx
about 16 years ago
Posts: 12656
Member since: Feb 2008

Where are my fiat currency and housing a hedge against inflation people?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by bmw
about 16 years ago
Posts: 219
Member since: Jan 2009

gold obviously

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Hugh_G
about 16 years ago
Posts: 223
Member since: Aug 2009

LOL. Gold or real estate is like somebody in 2002 saying "Cisco or Qualcomm??" The answer is: Neither!

Real estate won't be a good investment for the avg person for another decade or more. Though as a place to live, you can't beat real estate. At least until they get that whole space-colony thing going.

Gold is at all time highs, and while I fully expect it to appreciate further over the next decade, it is due for a correction. Silver, which is 70% off its all-time high, is a MUCH better bet if you feel like playing precious metals right now. Given the state of the U.S. budget and the way liberals are passing spending bill after spending bill, buying somethign negatively correlated with the dollar is not a bad idea. But go for silver.

Speaking of the U.S. peso, it is due for a small rally based on technical factors, and after the rally that's a great time to short. Prefer CHF or maybe JPY.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by bmw
about 16 years ago
Posts: 219
Member since: Jan 2009

Cisco then jk lol

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Fluter
about 16 years ago
Posts: 372
Member since: Apr 2009

Tiffany gold for me, baby.

{Manhattan real estate agent.}

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by urbandigs
about 16 years ago
Posts: 3629
Member since: Jan 2006

gold already corrected some 6-7%...more than I can say for stocks. A measley 7% correction would bring the Dow to around 10000.

that is yet to even happen

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by JuiceMan
about 16 years ago
Posts: 3578
Member since: Aug 2007

"They're not making any more land either."

Tell that to Singaporeans

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Rhino86
about 16 years ago
Posts: 4925
Member since: Sep 2006

These long term endpoint statements dont work. Sure, buying and holding Gold for 30 years has sucked. Buying and holding it for 10 years is the best investment you could have made. Buying stocks in 1966 and holding them until 1982 sucked....So did buying a coop in 1988 and selling it in 1998.

The case for gold now is that it has a place because fiat money is under serious question. Govts dont feel comfortable with their reserves.

Real estate is clearly as good an investment over the next ten years as it would have been in 1989.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Rhino86
about 16 years ago
Posts: 4925
Member since: Sep 2006

History suggests that stocks, at the 1998 price in 2010 are a good investment. Problem is that 1998 was a never before seen and maybe never again seen valuation level... At 20x Graham & Dodd P/E...stocks are just ok.

Short term bonds it is...!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by truthskr10
about 16 years ago
Posts: 4088
Member since: Jul 2009

I remember the early 90's where the norm for blue chip stocks was a PE ratio of 30.
Then when the madness hit it was 60. I think in bad times you stick to the lower multiples(or in RE lower price to rent ratio) and good times your stuck with a companies growth and market share rise potential (or in RE expansion,air rights,etc).
Of course, who is "blue chip" these days can be mirky.

Gold gets all the glory (filet mignon) but I've always been a fan of blue collar copper (skirt steak).

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Rhino86
about 16 years ago
Posts: 4925
Member since: Sep 2006

Gold is a bet against fiat money. Copper is a bet on global growth. Not substitutes really.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by truthskr10
about 16 years ago
Posts: 4088
Member since: Jul 2009

I hear ya Rhino but they generally move up an down together, at least for the last 20 years.
You'll see a much bigger copper dip in '09 because of RE but metals tend to travel together.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Rhino86
about 16 years ago
Posts: 4925
Member since: Sep 2006

Really? I'll have to check out a chart. Do you have the issue of roll yield with copper? Thats the other advantage gold seems to have over many other commodities. No negative roll yield.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by truthskr10
about 16 years ago
Posts: 4088
Member since: Jul 2009

I am not a frequent trader by any means and that is out of my area of knowledge.
The few times I bought copper, it was long term holding (more than 1 year).
As I am in a business where some products are made of copper, I have dabbled in when I felt it was too low or in for a long term run.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by jamba97
about 16 years ago
Posts: 79
Member since: Dec 2009

what is roll yield? do you mean cost of carry

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Rhino86
about 16 years ago
Posts: 4925
Member since: Sep 2006

I mean if you own a fund based on futures when they sell
near months and buy out months they can lose money. So
yes. It works for you if you are talking about a backwardated
commodity. Or is it contango.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by jamba97
about 16 years ago
Posts: 79
Member since: Dec 2009

ok we're on the same page...cost of carry is the term btw

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Rhino86
about 16 years ago
Posts: 4925
Member since: Sep 2006

Negative roll yield is a term people use as well.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Topper
about 16 years ago
Posts: 1335
Member since: May 2008

A few additional random thoughts on gold.

Global production has been declining for years with places like South Africa down around 50%.

Major developed nations have about around 30% of their reserves in gold bullion. Emerging market countries, by contrast, have only around 1% of their reserves in gold bullion. Many of them are looking to diversify their foreign exchange holdings rather than be a hostage to the fate of the dollar. When you look at major world currencies it almost seems like an "ugly contest." The dollar has tons of problems. But the Euro is sort of an artificial currency and eurosclerosis remains a problem. The Japanese yen is the currency of a country with massive debt and declining population.

Bottom line: it just seems prudent for emerging market central banks to diversify their reserves. China has added 454 tonnes of gold to its reserves since 2003. India just bought 200 tonnes from the IMF. Gold has been called a "barbarous relic" but will continue to play an important role as long as governments continue to overspend and print paper money.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Rhino86
about 16 years ago
Posts: 4925
Member since: Sep 2006

Word up. And it's acting great on the pullback to the exp50 day average.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Rhino86
about 16 years ago
Posts: 4925
Member since: Sep 2006

Right a relic that has been a store of value for recorded history. What's the history of fiat money about 80 years?

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment