Skip Navigation
StreetEasy Logo

paying down the mortgage debt

Started by Riversider
over 15 years ago
Posts: 13572
Member since: Apr 2009
Discussion about
More homeowners are paying down their principal balances when they refinance their mortgages, reversing a trend that became popular during the housing bubble, when rising prices allowed borrowers to “cash out” by taking on more debt, Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored mortgage finance company, said on Wednesday. Low interest rates on traditional savings accounts are playing a role, according to Frank Nothaft, Freddie Mac’s chief economist. Borrowers might find they saved more money by paying down their mortgage principal, rather than funnelling money into low-interest bearing certificates of deposit and other savings products, he said. As a result, “the choice of paying down mortgage principal is very attractive to borrowers with extra cash”
Response by walterh7
over 15 years ago
Posts: 383
Member since: Dec 2006

Sounds logical. De-leveraging into an environment of declining asset values is very rational. Leverage is a killer in a down market.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Riversider
over 15 years ago
Posts: 13572
Member since: Apr 2009

Symtpoms of Keynsian failure according to Chris Whalen....

ZIRP, which stands for the "zero-interest rate policy" maintained by the Fed. We also refer to it as post-Keynesian flailing, but whatever. In past issues we've spoken about the pernicious effects of the Fed's low interest rate policy, a trend that is now visible in the shrinking NIM visible in the financial statements of banks, funds and anybody else who is interest rate sensitive. Going back to the days of President Abraham Lincoln, the only reason to hold fiat currency was the old fashioned notion of earning a rate of interest above the rate of inflation, something the Fed currently prohibits c/o the ZIRP zombie NIM drip for the banking industry. Big picture, the carry trade enhancement from ZIRP is a subsidy for credit losses by banks that comes out of the pockets of savers.

http://us1.institutionalriskanalytics.com/pub/IRAMain.asp

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by jordyn
over 15 years ago
Posts: 820
Member since: Dec 2007

I don't understand how discouraging saving is a Keynsian failing. It's a goal of Keynsian monetary policy to discourage saving. (There may be an argument that this isn't the right strategy, but to act like it's a big surprise that a policy discourages the thing it's designed to discourage is either dumb or dishonest.)

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Riversider
over 15 years ago
Posts: 13572
Member since: Apr 2009

Too much spending....

and now according to Chris Whalen we have a lost of confidence in debt, driven in part by zero interest rate Fed policy. The Keynsian flailing(not failiing) was from his website.

This is a great article quote..

We remind our readers of the common political roots of all zombies because central banks and other GSEs are fascist constructs (see Yahoo Tech|Ticker "Fascist" Fed Will Put the Squeeze on GE Capital"). The lack of accountability and corruption so visible in the handling of the financial crisis in the U.S. and around the world, to us, simply proves that many of our financial and governmental institutions are becoming more and more fascist -- this because they follow an authoritarian form of governance, as opposed to democracy or classical liberalism. For example, when the officials who run the Fed oppose public audits of their operations, they reveal the fascist, authoritarian tendencies of the central bank for all to see. A monetary authority in a democracy that truly serves the public interest has nothing to hide. But instead concealment is the current priority for central banks from Washington to Beijing -- both because of the excess of debt and the paralell growth of official corruption.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by gcondo
over 15 years ago
Posts: 1111
Member since: Feb 2009

seems to me this is the time to borrow more money in a refinance...

oddly enough, I am refinancing and lowering my principal amount by a small amount lol.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Riversider
over 15 years ago
Posts: 13572
Member since: Apr 2009

gcondo, that's very difficult considering the current underwriting environment. Cash-in's are more popular than cash-outs. People are putting up cash to qualify for a rate reduction in those instances where home values are a problem for LTV thresholds...

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Riversider
over 15 years ago
Posts: 13572
Member since: Apr 2009

gcondo, the problem with taking money out, is that anything you invest in will earn less than the mortgage rate, unless you take on risk..

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by gcondo
over 15 years ago
Posts: 1111
Member since: Feb 2009

I have not had much problem yielding more than 4% this year. Sure, there is more risk, but 4% is not difficult.

Anyway, with all this talk, I too have lowered my principal amount, so wtfdik

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Riversider
over 15 years ago
Posts: 13572
Member since: Apr 2009

GCONDO, Mortgage current coupon is 3.6% which implies a mortgage rate of around 4.25.
If you are doing an equity take-out then the tax deduction is limited to 100K. So if we ignore the 100k,
which really was intended for home improvements one would need a return after tax of 4.25. I don't see it..But certainly interested in what investmetns you believe meets the test.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by gcondo
over 15 years ago
Posts: 1111
Member since: Feb 2009

if you like equities... MO is currently yielding over 6% with a decent long-term uptrend going.

I like natural gas long term.

risk? sure - reward, probably.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by columbiacounty
over 15 years ago
Posts: 12708
Member since: Jan 2009

And more

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by columbiacounty
over 15 years ago
Posts: 12708
Member since: Jan 2009

truth, making it easy for you

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by conradcounty
over 15 years ago
Posts: 124
Member since: Jul 2010

columbiacounty ,you seem upset. Is it because aboutready wished us farewell? Conveniently timed the morning she was going on vacation?

She'll be back. She wished streeteasy farewell two years ago. Jsmith posted the link to her farewell, didn't you see it?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by columbiacounty
over 15 years ago
Posts: 12708
Member since: Jan 2009

rs

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by conradcounty
over 15 years ago
Posts: 124
Member since: Jul 2010

cc

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment