"Marking the close"
Started by dtown
about 18 years ago
Posts: 9
Member since: Feb 2008
Discussion about
For those who've never heard the phrase, it's a form of market manipulation where if one has, say a large position in stock, for margin and profit and loss calculations one may buy a small bit right at the close in a sloppy manner, possibly overpaying a bit, the position will be "marked" or valued to that sale. It's illegal and policed for in many financial markets, but it seems like there are... [more]
For those who've never heard the phrase, it's a form of market manipulation where if one has, say a large position in stock, for margin and profit and loss calculations one may buy a small bit right at the close in a sloppy manner, possibly overpaying a bit, the position will be "marked" or valued to that sale. It's illegal and policed for in many financial markets, but it seems like there are shades of it in real estate. When a developer sells a unit at some price and does a huge concession on the backend, I presume his building and other comps are marked to the sale price, not taking the concession into account. I'm sure some of this goes on, but in people's professional estimation how prevalent is it? It seems like it has the potential to skew comps considerably. It worries me especially here in the financial district. Am I overthinking it? [less]
You basically answered your own question. There's a huge incentive for developers to do it, and no practical way to police it. Caveat emptor.
So would you say the best (and only) defense is to look *very* closely and in great detail at your comps and stay within the range you decide?
Lowball and then the concessions will emerge in front of your eyes.