Skip Navigation

Sale at 152 West 58th Street #PH

Started by cxg48
over 13 years ago
Posts: 5
Member since: Jun 2012
Discussion about 152 West 58th Street #PH
anyone know why the cc increase drastically after 10 years? goes up to almost $4/sf. seems like a good apt
Response by matsonjones
over 13 years ago
Posts: 1183
Member since: Feb 2007

They bought out the land lease and know have a HUGE mortgage on the building.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
over 13 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

No they didn't and don't. The co-op has owned the land ever since the building converted in 1983.

The co-op has no mortgage at all. They paid it off in 2006 with part of the $4,100,000 they got from Extell for air rights. (The new http://streeteasy.com/nyc/building/one57-condominium is to the south.)

One57 has huge mortgages in the hundreds of millions, which're cross-recorded under the co-op's block/lot because of the air rights. They're probably what you saw.

This apartment is just a share-heavy high-maintenance penthouse. The new owner will pay $4191 for now, with the usual increases. The seller is kicking back $240,000, either in one whack or spread over ten years. I don't know why the seller doesn't just reduce the sales price and be done with it.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
over 13 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008
Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
over 13 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

The PH is over-weighted with shares, especially now that there'll a 90-story building looming next over it.

It has 381 shares, while #5B (http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/684129-coop-152-west-58th-street-midtown-new-york) has 102. A big premium for a few hundred square feet, an extra bath, and terraces.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by matsonjones
over 13 years ago
Posts: 1183
Member since: Feb 2007

NWT: Thank you!! I was indeed seeing the One57 information, and thank you for your thoroughness - much obliged...

It is a interesting - some coops with terraced units heavily overweight the share allocations on these, while others almost not at all.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment

Most popular

  1. 20 Comments
  2. 25 Comments