Skip Navigation
StreetEasy Logo

207 East 74th Street, Apt. 12G

Started by fager1
about 13 years ago
Posts: 16
Member since: Jan 2010
Discussion about
This is what happens when you feed an apartment Wonderbread: it grows from 720' to 850'. I saw this apartment when it was on the market in 2011. It did not show well because it needed a lot of work. One of the interesting "features" was the mirror on the bathroom ceiling. Apparently the market told the seller no dice at the last asking of $612,000-which would have meant a substantial loss to the seller-and it was taken off. Now miracle of miracles, a sleazy new broker-also from Corcoran-has decided to inflate the square footage to justify the absurd new asking of $775K. And many brokers wonder why they're held in such low regard by much of the public, buyers and sellers alike.
Response by huntersburg
about 13 years ago
Posts: 11329
Member since: Nov 2010

>it grows from 720' to 850'.
>One of the interesting "features" was the mirror on the bathroom ceiling.

And there you go, what is the issue?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Aaron2
about 13 years ago
Posts: 1698
Member since: Mar 2012

I'm ok with the bath -- makes the best of a miniscule space. The seller's bigger challenge will be the finances: per the broker's web site, "Excellent co-op allows up 65% financing.", so you're putting down at least 35%. Yeah, it's not a 50% or 100% cash building, but 35% is a non-trivial hurdle. Nice closet space, and windowed kitchen (wonder if it's lot line) though. Wonder how difficult the board is?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by fager1
about 13 years ago
Posts: 16
Member since: Jan 2010

Aaron2 No, not really. More people than you would think would have little problem coughing up a minimum of 35 percent down. The bigger challenge, in my opinion, would be a) trying to convince someone that this apartment is now actually something close to 850 square feet-when it has, in fact, been advertised for at least the past few years, as being 720', and b) even with a better selling environment than fifteen months ago, that this apartment is worth anywhere near an asking price of $775,000 when it couldn't sell with the last asking price of $612,000. Again, as per my OP, I place most of the onus on this new broker, who at best is engaging in both highly deceptive advertising, although, in the real estate world, quite legal, and laughable wishful thinking.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Truth
about 13 years ago
Posts: 5641
Member since: Dec 2009

I saw an apartment in Bay Ridge,in August 2011 for sale at a listing price of 290k. It had been on the market for months at that point.
A good-size one-bedroom. Renovated kitchen and bath, very nice in a good doorman building on Shore Road.

The entryway, hallway leading to the bedroom and the bedroom wall behind the bed were all mirrored.
Looked like something out of a 70s porn flick.

The buyers broker who showed it to me told me the owner purchased it with the mirrors already there and was too cheap to have the mirrors removed.

A couple of weeks after I saw the apartment, the owner raised the listing price to $295k.
After months went by he lowered the price by 2k.

Many months later he lowered the price again. It's still on the market, with a few more price-drops, last I looked for 265k.
He should have had the mirrors removed. Other apartments in that building have been selling, so it must be the mirrors that are causing that apartment not to show well.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Truth
about 13 years ago
Posts: 5641
Member since: Dec 2009

I was curious to see if it's still unsold: Yep, still holding at $265k, 636 days on the market.
Lousy listing broker. She should advise the seller to remove those mirrors. And drop the listing price by another 25k.
NWT could find that listing in 5 minutes, he's not around today so:

9201 Shore Road #C-711. (844sf.)

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment