Skip Navigation
StreetEasy Logo

condo renting

Started by icubook
about 12 years ago
Posts: 2
Member since: Aug 2007
Discussion about
what are typical fees that a condo management company can charge an owner when renting an apartment in nyc? Our building just sent us an email stating it would cost 1500 to move in and another 1500 to move out. The renter would also have to pay 2000 to make use of amenities- ie our gym, roof deck. Management company is charging 1500 and would hold 2 months deposit. These sums sound extradinarily high for a 1 bedroom rental in a condo worth about 3800 thousand/month. These rules amost sound like coop
Response by Mikev
about 12 years ago
Posts: 431
Member since: Jun 2010

What the condo and management company are able to charge when subletting are dictated by the condo's management agreement with the company. Lets assume that the 1500 is what would be charged if you moved in and out, even though that seems high. I do not understand the amenity charge if you are stating this is a condo and I will assume you pay all in your common charges. The only way this makes sense is if the condo Board passed a rule stating that tenants would have to pay an additional fee on top of what you pay. Either way the whole thing seems high.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by icubook
about 12 years ago
Posts: 2
Member since: Aug 2007

the board is actually try to propose these drastic changes. It makes no sense to me why I should pay for amenities through my common charges and still have my rentee pay amenity charge. 1500 to move into and another 1500 to move out seems very high as well.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by csn
about 12 years ago
Posts: 450
Member since: Dec 2007

Most of the fees go to the condo. The reason I am told is that renters do more wear and tear on the apartments,amenities and the staff than the actual owners living there. I am sure this is true to some point but theses fees seem excessive since much of these costs are paid through the common charges. One Condo wanted to also charge a percent of the gross rent on top of these other charges. That was withdrawn but they than raised the other fees even more. The most objections came from the unit owners that were living there because it affects that value of the apartments.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Mikev
about 12 years ago
Posts: 431
Member since: Jun 2010

I am not sure I buy into the argument that renters do more wear and tear outside of the apartment. The apartments are owned by the Owner so the condo should have zero concern over the condition inside, while the owner should make sure they vet their tenant well. AS to amenities, there are a bunch of subletters in my building and I hardly ever see them in the gym when I am there. We are a small building and new so most still know each other. It seems your condo is just attempting to figure out a way to bring in addtional income, while at the same time making it more burdensome on you to rent as you have to now disclose all these additional fees which I assume you will pass along.

It is a tough balancing act because condo's really have zero control over renting as opposed to a coop. The only way to attempt to have control is by creating house rules that need to be followed.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by fieldschester
about 12 years ago
Posts: 3525
Member since: Jul 2013

It's BS. But icubook, do you really want to be a single unit landlord? Market is hot. Get rid of the place. Buy a REIT or stocks like Facebook or Bestbuy or Ford or Pandora or Netflix or Yahoo or McKesson that have beat Apple.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment