Skip Navigation

Rant

Started by mconnors
about 18 years ago
Posts: 6
Member since: Nov 2006
Discussion about
Why do they keep tearing down beautiful iconic new york establishments to build something that looks like a giant washing machine?!? Can no one build a building that doesn't look like a giant ugly appliance? Who are all these people that can afford to live in there and why would they want to live in a place that fugly?
Response by voracious reader
about 18 years ago
Posts: 41
Member since: Apr 2007

Read John Silber's Architecture of the Absurd. Sure reinforced my beliefs about some of the stuff out there that's being built.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by drdrd
about 18 years ago
Posts: 1905
Member since: Apr 2007

Yes, it seems that architecture is in a very sad place of late but I think that the clients also bear some blame for this sad state of affairs. The architect is only as good as their client - & vice versa.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by voracious reader
about 18 years ago
Posts: 41
Member since: Apr 2007

drdrd... Your point is well discussed in Silber's Architecture of the Absurd!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by mconnors
about 18 years ago
Posts: 6
Member since: Nov 2006

I asked an architect why- he said big stupid ugly box is the cheapest way to go. The latest victim is 2 orchard in lower east side. Beautiful old building with a fantastic bar downstairs called the good world. Slated to go soon. Very sad.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by West81st
about 18 years ago
Posts: 5564
Member since: Jan 2008

Not only cheap to build, but also the most efficient use of space. That's more critical with office buildings, where you're basically carving the space into cubicles and offices. But it's a factor with residential too: cookie-cutter buildings accommodate the maximum number of cookie-cutter apartments and cookie-cutter fixtures.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment