Skip Navigation

Mortgage Contingency

Started by tribecaguy19
over 17 years ago
Posts: 12
Member since: May 2008
Discussion about
Just negotiated a purchase and the contract was returned dropping the mortgage contingency. Have all of the preapprovals in place personally but understand that there is still building risk to the bank that may cause them to pull out. Any experience with how aggressive sellers have been on these kind of points? The market is changing, but any expereince out there on either side? Brokers, chime in!
Response by stevejhx
over 17 years ago
Posts: 12656
Member since: Feb 2008

Test them. Say no.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by jordyn
over 17 years ago
Posts: 820
Member since: Dec 2007

This is something that should probably be negotiated as part of the offer as opposed to in the contract details. However, it's obviously too late for that, so...

It sounds like you're talking about new construction. If so, you're faced with the risk that there will be a significant change in underwriting standards or that the appraisal won't come in near your purchase price. Personally, that's not a risk I would take unless the price was substantially discounted to reflect the added risk as well as the period of time your deposit will be tied up. I walked away from a new construction deal earlier in the year on this basis. What you do is up to you, but there are definitely some developers offering mortgage contingencies at this point.

If we're not talking about new construction, I would imagine that mortgage contingencies would be absolutely expected and acceptable in nearly all deals.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by bugelrex
over 17 years ago
Posts: 499
Member since: Apr 2007

If this is not new dev:

- if condo - find out the % of renters in the building. The Bank may decide to decline if the % is too high
- if condo - risky, the Bank may find several issues with the co-op. Eg
- finances of the board are a mess/missing
- pending lawsuits against the co-op

If you loose your job, you may run into problems contractually. In this environment, unless you can pay all cash, its not worth the risk *at this time*

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by stevejhx
over 17 years ago
Posts: 12656
Member since: Feb 2008

I agree with jordyn, this is not the time to be signing new dev w/o a mortgage contingency.

"the appraisal won't come in near your purchase price"

is spot on.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by stevejhx
over 17 years ago
Posts: 12656
Member since: Feb 2008

BTW I did new construction once, and the builder went bankrupt. I came out fine in the end b/c it was a rising market, but if you're on the other side of it, caveat emptor.

It's HELL.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by grunty
over 17 years ago
Posts: 311
Member since: Mar 2007

I would recommend that you insist on the the contingency being put back in. There are way too many things that could happen btw signing the contract and your closing. Building risk is just one. I'm talking about things you may not have any control over...everything from weird financial market gyrations to attacks on the city. I'm not sure this is just a new dev risk...

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by jordyn
over 17 years ago
Posts: 820
Member since: Dec 2007

It's not just a new dev risk, but it's particularly acute in new developments because there's generally a much longer gap between signing the contract and closing, which means the probability of any of the various bad things that could happen increases significantly and you can't get a useful appraisal to lock up a mortgage commitment in advance.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by stevejhx
over 17 years ago
Posts: 12656
Member since: Feb 2008

jordyn is spot on. I know that people don't like Miami comparisons (though they're wrong) but go here:

http://buybeach.com/condos/condo_mls.htm

choose Bentley Bay, then look at any apartment with the extension xx04.

I sold 1704 almost 3 years ago for $1 million, right before Wilma hit. Now you have 1904 wanting $1.1 million, and 1804 wanting $979,000, and 2004 wanting $750,000.

Do you see what happens when people will not accept reality? 2004 hasn't been able to get $750,000 for 3 years, yet the apartment BELOW it wants $1.1 million, or 50% more.

Beware of a falling real estate market - it is not rational.

DO NOT sign any contract w/o a mortgage contingency.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by kylewest
over 17 years ago
Posts: 4455
Member since: Aug 2007

If you can't afford to do the deal without financing in case things fall apart, you have no business waiving the mortgage contingency.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by tribecaguy19
over 17 years ago
Posts: 12
Member since: May 2008

thanks all, I had no intention of dropping the MC, but just wanted to test the environment and you sealed it for me . . .

BTW -- this is not new dev, it is a condo flip. not too worried about the appraisal, as we got the price down to about 15% below other comps in the bldg, but considering the mkt environment, and the fickle nature of banks, don't think it is worth the risk.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by dledven
over 17 years ago
Posts: 198
Member since: May 2008

Mtk conditions are crazy, and banks can change the lending standards at any time or demand certain things you are not prepared for or unable to fulfill, having said that you need to insist on a MC, or be prepared or comfortable doing all cash (just in case)

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by cb81
over 17 years ago
Posts: 39
Member since: Mar 2008

whats the typical scope of protection that a mortgage contingency offer.. is it an automatic out for the buyer? ie., i get a lower appraisal = higher LTV = higher, but not unaffordable rate. is it a material change, or will ANY change absolve me from the contract?

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment