Skip Navigation

88 Greenwich vs 20 Pine

Started by savmav
about 17 years ago
Posts: 7
Member since: Dec 2008
Discussion about
Brokers are showing me both. Other than 20 Pine not yet being done, anyone have a view on the comparison? Which group of condo owners are more realistic with rental prices? What about true useful building ammenities? Or is it best to go with one of the rental buildings like 20 Exchange Place?
Response by front_porch
about 17 years ago
Posts: 5320
Member since: Mar 2008

I love 88 Greenwich, but FWIW, the last client I showed 88 Greenwich to ended up in the Verdesian.

ali r.
{downtown broker}

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by savmav
about 17 years ago
Posts: 7
Member since: Dec 2008

why do you love 88 Greenwich? Why'd your client choose Verdesian?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by front_porch
about 17 years ago
Posts: 5320
Member since: Mar 2008

From 2003-2005 I ran the real estate section of the Post, which was my exposure to much of NYC's real estate community. Through that job I met and grew to like Andrew Heiberger, who at the time ran CitiHabitats, and left to develop 88 Greenwich. From where I stand now, as a real estate agent, I feel like there are "good developers," and I thought Heiberger did a good job, maybe because of his sales background, delivering value for money. I like the finishes of 88 Greenwich, and I like the shared amenities rooms. And I believe long-term ,that side of FiDi will gentrify.

Of course, if you're renting, you have to weigh how much owners are charging you for finishes, location, etc.

The Verdesian is a very well-run "green" building. Some of "green" is hype, but some of it isn't. I have actually put two clients in there, and they're both thrilled with the quality and the service. Note that the location works for them because they both need PATH access. (Some people think BPC is out-of-the-way, but some think it's "Tribeca-adjacent" and like having access to that retail. )

We have been having OP discussions on other threads -- at this point, the Verdesian is probably offering one-month to brokers, so that might be a financial consideration too.

ali r.
{downtown broker}

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc212
about 17 years ago
Posts: 484
Member since: Jul 2008

I have looked extensively at both bldgs., and here are my observations:

20 Pine: Nice bldg and finishes, but I'd stay away only because of the financial uncertainties and odd layouts. The last I heard, the few owners may end up carrying the cost for the unsold/unrented units if the company goes belly up.

88 Greenwich: Very sexy, but I'd be very careful. Some engineers mentioned about the land collapse issue in the immediate area. Also, MTA has a plan to convert the garage into a 20+ story office bldg., which will block all of the south-facing windows--since 88 Greenwich doesn't have the air rights. The sales rep pretended as though she didn't know this when I asked her specifically about it. It won't be happening for another decade or so, but it is certainly a consideration when you're spending close to $1M.

In that area, I'd instead recommend 45 John and 90 William. They were both very nice overall, and the pricing is quite smart.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by sticky
about 17 years ago
Posts: 256
Member since: Sep 2008

I felt that 88 Greenwich has GORGEOUS common areas, but gloomy dinky feeling rooms.

Finishes in 20 Pine have a nicer, much sexier look.

20 Pine has the better abatement & more amenities (however most amenities aren't ready yet).

20 Pine is definitely more in the main drag of Wall Street, closer to restaurants, shops & grocery stores. 88 Greenwich definitely feels more like you're on the edge of town.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by savmav
about 17 years ago
Posts: 7
Member since: Dec 2008

sticky - 88 Greenwich, when you say the rooms are gloomy and dinky, are you refering to apartments? And then how so. Interesting front-porch said she liked the finishes in the apartments.

nyc212, thanks for the info on the garage. I'm looking to rent, so I guess it won't affect me for some number of years.

Would be real irony if the developer of 20 Pine went "belly up" given the wealth of these people!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by exit2
about 17 years ago
Posts: 98
Member since: Dec 2008

neither. go for wm beaver house

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by rufus
about 17 years ago
Posts: 1095
Member since: Jul 2008

When will 20 Pine get finished? It's amazing how most NYC condos are getting delays after delays. Almost no project gets done on time.

The location for both buildings are awful. The notion that financial district is now "trendy" is downright laughable.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by alpine292
about 17 years ago
Posts: 2771
Member since: Jun 2008

DO NOT buy at 20 Pine. WAY TOO MANY apartments for rent. Seriously, look at the rental listings on Street Easy and please explain to me why the heck there are so many!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Maraman
about 17 years ago
Posts: 165
Member since: Nov 2008

William Beaver will never sell. Prices are too high, set for a Wall Street that existed a year ago and is gone forever.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by kingdeka
about 17 years ago
Posts: 230
Member since: Dec 2008

I looked at both 20 Pine and 88 Greenwich. Don't like the floorplans in the conversion bldgs. Just my taste though. Settling on new construction instead.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment

Most popular

  1. 25 Comments
  2. 42 Comments