Here are the values for NY area. You can figure out which drop you want. June 2005 197.77 July 2005 199.86 August 2005 202.33 September 2005 204.83 October 2005 207.64 November 2005 210.30 December 2005 212.68 January 2006 213.50 February 2006 214.47 March 2006 214.33 April 2006 214.97 May 2006 215.57 June 2006 215.83 July 2006 215.25 August 2006 214.34 September 2006 214.08 October 2006 214.28... [more]
Here are the values for NY area. You can figure out which drop you want.
June 2005 197.77
July 2005 199.86
August 2005 202.33
September 2005 204.83
October 2005 207.64
November 2005 210.30
December 2005 212.68
January 2006 213.50
February 2006 214.47
March 2006 214.33
April 2006 214.97
May 2006 215.57
June 2006 215.83
July 2006 215.25
August 2006 214.34
September 2006 214.08
October 2006 214.28
November 2006 214.24
December 2006 213.79
January 2007 212.78
February 2007 212.51
March 2007 212.39
April 2007 211.61
May 2007 210.51
June 2007 209.49
July 2007 208.36
August 2007 207.17
September 2007 206.37
October 2007 205.52
November 2007 204.36
December 2007 202.08
January 2008 200.44
February 2008 198.29
March 2008 196.51
April 2008 194.73
May 2008 194.22
June 2008 194.74
July 2008 193.72
August 2008 193.45
September 2008 191.78
October 2008 190.04
[less]
Response by stevejhx
over 17 years ago
Posts: 12656
Member since: Feb 2008
Though not directly relevant to Manhattan, it does show we're below 2005 prices in the region.
Back down to 2003.
Unless malraux has another C/S interpretation for "prime Manhattan."
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by alpine292
over 17 years ago
Posts: 2771
Member since: Jun 2008
October's decline is much smaller than September's month over month. Maybe prices will keep declining, but not as much.
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by alpine292
over 17 years ago
Posts: 2771
Member since: Jun 2008
stevejhx was right about his 50% decline prediciton. He got the number 100% correct. The only thing he got wrong is WHERE prices will decline 50% since the only places with 50% declines are CA, FL, AZ, and FL.
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by alpine292
over 17 years ago
Posts: 2771
Member since: Jun 2008
and NV
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by w67thstreet
over 17 years ago
Posts: 9003
Member since: Dec 2008
292 we'r in the 1st inning...
I for one think Steve is wrong... it's gonna be like 65% in the higher end :)
tiny bubbles... tiny bubbles... they make me smile... tiny bubbles.... (he died this year... the singer)
Though not directly relevant to Manhattan, it does show we're below 2005 prices in the region.
Back down to 2003.
Unless malraux has another C/S interpretation for "prime Manhattan."
October's decline is much smaller than September's month over month. Maybe prices will keep declining, but not as much.
stevejhx was right about his 50% decline prediciton. He got the number 100% correct. The only thing he got wrong is WHERE prices will decline 50% since the only places with 50% declines are CA, FL, AZ, and FL.
and NV
292 we'r in the 1st inning...
I for one think Steve is wrong... it's gonna be like 65% in the higher end :)
tiny bubbles... tiny bubbles... they make me smile... tiny bubbles.... (he died this year... the singer)