Stiglitz lost his marbles, states cant print $$
Started by Riversider
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 13572
Member since: Apr 2009
Discussion about
. Nobel Prize winning economist Joseph Stiglitz, warned a New York City crowd last night that the rash of state budget cuts could have dire consequences for the economy. Appearing at an event hosted by Manhattan's Jewish Community Center, Stiglitz said that state cutbacks would amount to "a negative stimulus of half the magnitude of the positive stimulus that is coming out of Washington.
so...what does this have to do with your stupid headline?
You are a tard. he is talking about FISCAL policy. This has nothing to do with prininting money, which is MONETARY policy.
Arafat wins Noble Peace prize for putting bombs on school buses.
Gore wins Noble Peace prize for a hoax.
Obama wins Noble Peace prize for a a a a a a nothing.
Stiglitz and Krugman win Nobles for the theory of 2 +2 =5.
and you won it for ?
Stiglitz didnt' seem to understand that the Federal government can spend more than it takes in by borrowing and worst case debase the currency. States and local municalities don't have the same luxuries. I've seen a numver of his interviews where his answers were not that well thought out.
> Gore wins Noble Peace prize for a hoax.
The internet is a hoax?
Also, how about when they gave it to the African lady who said that AIDS was an invention of the white man to kill blacks?
No riversider, stiglitz understands perfectly well that MOST (not all) states can't run deficits. Therefore he is arguing for MORE federal stimulus, as he, Krugman, and Roubini have been doing all along. He is not saying states can or shoudl do anything different, you numb nuts, because he knows they can't. He is saying (and Krugman had a grpah on this in his blog earlier this week) that the increase in federal spending is almost canceled out by drastic cuts in state and local spending.
still waiting to understand basis of headline other than fantasy.
...and before you respond, understand that he advocates for Nixon-style direct unrestricted block cash grants to states, FROM THE FEDERAL GOVT, so that states do not have to cut their budget. He did not say states should break their budget laws.
I happen to agree - a plain per capita grant of $XXX per person per state would allow each state to spend money as it sees fit, rather than the dizzying array of Obama stipulations.
I'm pretty sure the Gore reference was to global warming.
Krugman is so dumb. The only reason he won a Noble was because of his constant Bush bashing. Krugman couldn't run a hotdog stand and make money.
is that a noble or a barnes?
The Nobel committee has really devalued the prizes in the last few years. Arafat? Gore? Krugman? Obama? Why don't they just call it the Anyone Against George Bush Prize?
too many winners. maybe they could present it to cheney.
well..lets see.
arafat won 1/3 of the prize along with peres and rabin. and that was in 1994--not exactly in the last few years.
oh details.
When America becomes fully socialists maybe Krugman can run the Department of Fair Share Distribution and Equalization of Income.
Juliag is clearly dumb, because Krugman won for something he wrote in the late 1970s...long before Bush was a twinkle in anybody's eye. What's more, the Nobel economics committee is ENTIRELY seperate from the peace prize/literature/sciences committee, they have nothing to do with each other. Also, I find it hard to believed that a tenured professor at Princeton with a BA from Yale and Phd from MIT could be DUMB. Finally, the fact that pretty much every other economics organization globally has voted him one of the greatest living economists kind of makes it seem silly to single out the Nobel cmte....as though they were some outlier.
BTW, Milton Friedman was also brilliant.
Hey jason10006, Yes it is true Freedman is a genius and so is Hayek,, But my friend, it doesn't matter how many left wing sycophants applaud Krugman's idiotic theories or how many socialist tenured professors praise him. krugman is a moron who's economic ideas would result in poverty for all and transform America into a third rate banana republic.
Krugman is a left wing economist popular with other big left wingers. He gets lots of attention because he writes for the NY Times.
History will look back at this crisis and realize that the application of Keynsian economics was flawed.
"... is a moron who's economic ideas ..."
... genius identifies moron in broken English; love it!
and riversider is busy quoting history, a personal friend of hers.
Hey what is with the little shriveled gray guy? Do I really want to unhide it? Seems like we should leave the gray shriveled nasties ignored.
alanhurt.... We know you are hurting. But can't you and your cohorts stop sucking the system dry.
alanhurt....We know you are hurting...But can't you and your cohorts stop sucking the system dry?
alanhurt.... I think that will be your new name. You are hurting and have needs. There must be shared sacrifice so alanhurt gets his fair share.
alanhurt... A bitter man