Skip Navigation

UWS or Greenwich Village?

Started by ChrisT
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 91
Member since: Apr 2009
Discussion about
Same price/maintenance but the one in the village does not have a doorman. Prefer the village but concerned about a non-doorman building for a young woman living alone. What are your thoughts?
Response by brendisch
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 11
Member since: Apr 2009

I'm a young woman who's lived alone in Manhattan for 8 years in the East Village. No doorman -- and I've never had any trouble.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by starfish
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 249
Member since: Jul 2007

Which is the better apartment physically? And, why is the maintenance at the non-doorman building the same as the doorman bldg. (i.e., where is that "extra" money going each month)?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by ChrisT
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 91
Member since: Apr 2009

Thanks brendisch.

starfish -- I haven't looked into the financials of the buildings yet but the apartments are physically similar. The UWS is about 75 sq ft bigger. The one in the village has a higher ceiling so appears larger.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by starfish
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 249
Member since: Jul 2007

I would vote UWS, but my wife would vote the village for what it's worth then (for a young woman living alone). I would look into the maintenance issue if I were you though - the extra $$ must be going somewhere if it's not paying for a bldg's staff. Good luck.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by ChrisT
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 91
Member since: Apr 2009

Thanks starfish. I will look into it. Is one location better than the other for subletting? Both coops allow it.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

Staffing is just one component of the building's nut. Taxes, underlying mortgage (if these're co-ops), etc., may be higher in the non-doorman building.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by starfish
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 249
Member since: Jul 2007

That's my point. He needs to figure out what the other factors are that are eating the maintenance - he may find the building has a huge mortgage, pending lawsuits, in progress/planned mechanical issues, etc.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by thebelltollsforthy
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 59
Member since: May 2008

I'd say UWS because of the cost of living. Food shops on UWS can not be beat. That alone means savings (and quality). More or less affordable resaturants + delivery. Village becomes more and more of a tourist trap with all the consequences.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by alanhart
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 12397
Member since: Feb 2007

I think you need to think of the doorman not as a security feature (which is really a non-issue these days, and electronics can easily be installed if it becomes a factor), but as a convenience factor. Does your lifestyle allow you to wait at home for deliveries large and small, or run off to the P.O. or UPS facility to pick them up? Do you like pickup/dropoff service for laundry and drycleaning, but don't love waiting at home?

Do you want your friend to pick up / drop off an envelope from your bldg. when you're not home? Or are you a work-at-home couch potato who doesn't mind waiting around.

Plenty of people manage just fine without a doorman, but for many others it gives them a lot more freedom.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by julia
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 2841
Member since: Feb 2007

there are some really great streets in the village that i would love to live on...the west side is nice but for me you can't beat the village...i live in a non-doorman bldg and don't have a problem...having a doorman would be nice for accepting packages, etc.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by ChrisT
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 91
Member since: Apr 2009

Thanks everyone! Simple answer. The reason why the maintenance is higher in the village is because there are fewer units in the building to share the expenses. It's a smaller building which I forgot to mention. Of course my attorney will look into pending lawsuits, etc. if we make an offer.

Regarding the convenience of a doorman. We would not be sending/receiving deliveries/packages often and the dry cleaner/laundry is a block away and UPS is close by too.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by waverly
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 1638
Member since: Jul 2008

alanhart - I don't disagree with you, but the doormen themselves think of their position primarily as a security role. They will do the other stuff (deliveries, buzz people up, anser questions, etc.) but their #1 responsibility is security.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by kylewest
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 4455
Member since: Aug 2007

This is a very personal decision. I prefer larger buildings with financial risk more spread out among greater number of shareholders. I also prefer conveniences of a doorman and added security: dry clean, keys for friends, extra set of keys for when I don't have mine for whatever reason, packages, had deliveries, watch my bags while I run back out for something at store, etc. It is also really hard for someone to steal a TV when they have to get by a doorman.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by pjc
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 175
Member since: Dec 2008

Personally, I would go with whichever 'hood I like better, since that will be your home.

Also, I would take into consideration if there is a noticeable difference in commuting time.

And whether you have friends or family nearby.

Having a doorman is nice, but not imperative for security or otherwise. My wife lived alone for 4 years at our current place, with no problem. She became friends with nearby merchants, and we sometimes have packages delivered around the corner at the liquor store, and have left extra keys with the guys that ran the cafe across the street (who also happen to live in our building). So you can find other ways of having people help out with these things.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment