Skip Navigation

Sale at 333 Central Park West #56

Started by Jerkstore
over 17 years ago
Posts: 474
Member since: Feb 2007
Discussion about 333 Central Park West #56
As noted on Curbed.....OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOF! 06/19/2008 Listed in StreetEasy by Prudential Elliman at $5,200,000. 07/01/2008 Price decreased by 6% to $4,875,000. 09/09/2008 Price decreased by 14% to $4,200,000. 12/08/2008 Price decreased by 17% to $3,495,000. 02/12/2009 Listing is no longer available. 02/19/2009 Re-listed by Prudential Elliman. 02/27/2009 Price decreased by 15% to $2,975,000. 06/04/2009 Price decreased by 16% to $2,495,000.
Response by 30yrs_RE_20_in_REO
over 17 years ago
Posts: 9913
Member since: Mar 2009

Unless you know this building, I hope no one is going to use this to make the argument that in general you can get 9's on CPW for under $3M.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by patient09
over 17 years ago
Posts: 1571
Member since: Nov 2008

30yr: I'm with you, if they can't get 2mm for a cool spread in the uber cool south eastern extreme section of morningside heights, how the hell are they going to get 3mm at 101 cpw with a bunch of old folks living there?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by West81st
over 17 years ago
Posts: 5564
Member since: Jan 2008

Am I the only person on this board who likes the Turin? They can't all be 88 CPW.

#56 is nothing special, but neither was #36, and it sold for $4.65MM.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by falcogold1
over 17 years ago
Posts: 4159
Member since: Sep 2008

stop me if a wrong....what a deal!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by urbandigs
over 17 years ago
Posts: 3629
Member since: Jan 2006

i saw this unit at the previous price...not the best views in most rooms, and a strange flow, but certainly huge! Im sure it will sell with this latest cut, and Ill put my bets at over 2M in the end.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by West81st
over 17 years ago
Posts: 5564
Member since: Jan 2008

UD: You see a lot more renos than I do. Is this one as penny-wise/pound-foolish as I think it is? My guess is they cost themselves at least $500K on the sale by skimping on about $50-100K worth of finishes.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by 30yrs_RE_20_in_REO
over 17 years ago
Posts: 9913
Member since: Mar 2009

"Am I the only person on this board who likes the Turin?"

Maybe...... ;)

It's typical Victorian architecture with lots of small rooms facing back into the building, which in general I am not very fond of (building usually look "glove shaped" with the apartments running down the fingers). Although I do like the usual details which you get - usually fairly ornate with very high ceilings. Usually square footage wise they ate the smallest vs others with the same room count.

"i saw this unit at the previous price...not the best views in most rooms, and a strange flow, but certainly huge! Im sure it will sell with this latest cut, and Ill put my bets at over 2M in the end."

Huge? I'm curious what you think the actual SF is?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by dwell
over 17 years ago
Posts: 2341
Member since: Jul 2008

p09: you consider CPW & 93-94 'morningside south"?

I consider it UWS in the 90s. To me, Morningside connotes Columbia.

tomato tomatoe

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by patient09
over 17 years ago
Posts: 1571
Member since: Nov 2008

joking broheim

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10023
over 17 years ago
Posts: 7614
Member since: Nov 2008

What detail? I've been in 106, can't say that the ceilings were very high or that there were many ornate details (interior).

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by 30yrs_RE_20_in_REO
over 17 years ago
Posts: 9913
Member since: Mar 2009

you think that's the original finishes?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
over 17 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

Bad bedroom layout. The northeast bedroom has no bath access, so has to use the old maid's bath off the laundry room. On other floors that bedroom either shares the master bath or, as in #106, has been combined with the master as a sort of study or dressing room.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10023
over 17 years ago
Posts: 7614
Member since: Nov 2008

Nope, but none of the pictures of 56 or 36 showed any ornate finishes. I just assumed that most of them were stripped a long time time ago.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
over 17 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

Agree with West81st re: #56's renovation. Looks too landlord-/sponsor-ish. E.g., having decided to put down white marble in the front hall, why stop halfway? Or why not run the (cheap-looking) kitchen cabinets up to the ceiling? If you're going for piss-elegant you really do need to go for it.

I'd put up with a lot of layout issues for the sake of a grand feel, but the Turin doesn't have the requisite wide rooms and high ceilings.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by gowest
over 17 years ago
Posts: 3
Member since: Jun 2009

I like The Turin. Was seriously considering an offer as the price has come down quite a bit but decided not to. I agree the layout is a little weird. The living/dining areas are probably the only two rooms I would leave as is. The other rooms need some renovation. Basically, I think if you like a lot of space, that's what you'll be buying. The common hallway is not fancy or special-looking - I expected more. I believe they have received offers on this place but I can't imagine the offers to be very high as they have all been turned down.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment