Barney to the rescue
Started by Riversider
over 17 years ago
Posts: 13573
Member since: Apr 2009
Discussion about
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124562533240635581.html Fannie Mae officials say the new rules haven't been as taxing as some claim. The mortgage company said the 70% rule doesn't apply to loan applications submitted through an underwriting program used by major lenders, and that hundreds of projects submitted through that program since March 1 have been approved even though their sales levels are... [more]
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124562533240635581.html Fannie Mae officials say the new rules haven't been as taxing as some claim. The mortgage company said the 70% rule doesn't apply to loan applications submitted through an underwriting program used by major lenders, and that hundreds of projects submitted through that program since March 1 have been approved even though their sales levels are below 70%. Developers are also able to apply for exemptions to the new policies for loans that are manually underwritten. Both Fannie and Freddie say they are preparing a response to the lawmakers. Fannie and Freddie have also boosted fees on mortgages for condos. Buyers without a minimum 25% down payment have to pay closing-cost fees equal to 0.75% of their loan, regardless of their credit score, under new rules that took effect in April. Fannie has said it will drop that fee in August for cooperative apartments and detached condos. and from an earlier Barney Frank http://commdocs.house.gov/committees/bank/hba92628.000/hba92628_0f.htm So I guess that may sum up to me why some of us have some differences on this. I do not want Fannie and Freddie to be just another bank. If they were not going to do more than another bank would because they have so many advantages, then we do not need them. And so therefore, I do think I do not want the same kind of focus on safety and soundness that we have in OCC and OTS. I want to roll the dice a little bit more in this situation towards subsidized housing. [less]
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=105565087
Recently, GM told workers it would close a parts distribution center in Massachusetts. The facility sits in the congressional district of Democrat Barney Frank. Frank chairs the House Committee on Financial Services, which oversees the very government money that has kept GM alive.
Asked if he was concerned about the government meddling in General Motors, Frank had this response: "That's a very odd question. If the government hadn't 'meddled' in General Motors, there would be no General Motors. 'Meddle' is what you say when you don't like it. 'Involve' is what you say when you do."
http://conservative-compendium.com/wordpress/2009/04/frank-to-moodys-how-dare-you-downgrade-municipal-bonds/
Saying he was “troubled” by the Moody’s action, which could make it “more expensive to borrow funds for infrastructure improvements,” the influential congressman said he planned a hearing in early May on treatment for municipalities’ general obligation bonds.
Saying he was %u201Ctroubled%u201D by the Moody%u2019s action, [...] the influential congressman said he planned a hearing in early May [...]
So, by his definition, this would be "meddling"?