Downwardly Mobile: Living on Less in the City An Upper East Sider Negotiates Job Loss; Discounts on Haircuts, Dental Work
Started by just_fo_debate
over 16 years ago
Posts: 17
Member since: Jun 2009
Discussion about
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204621904574248033091327704.html Several weeks ago, Rochelle Rachelson walked into a salon near her Upper East Side apartment in New York City and inquired about their cheapest cut. “$63,” came the reply. “Too much,” said Ms. Rachelson. The receptionist came back with a $48 cut from a junior stylist. “That’s still too much,” Ms. Rachelson replied, “I’m... [more]
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204621904574248033091327704.html Several weeks ago, Rochelle Rachelson walked into a salon near her Upper East Side apartment in New York City and inquired about their cheapest cut. “$63,” came the reply. “Too much,” said Ms. Rachelson. The receptionist came back with a $48 cut from a junior stylist. “That’s still too much,” Ms. Rachelson replied, “I’m not working.” View Full Image Hanna Melin “How about a student for $10?” “I’m in,” Ms. Rachelson said. It was a typically hard-won triumph for Ms. Rachelson, who has had to struggle for things she once took for granted ever since she went from living on a $57,000-a-year salary to living on $16,000 a year in unemployment checks. One remarkable thing abou t this recession is the speed of many people’s transition from shopping at Saks to cutting out coupons. People with lucrative professions and vacation homes are learning that they have been living closer to the edge than they thought. As a result, many of them are reassessing which expenditures are necessities and which amount to luxuries—and they are learning new consumer skills, such as bargaining, to help them afford what they can. The transition has been harsh for Ms. Rachelson, a 58-year-old woman who once enjoyed daily restaurant meals, weekly manicures, regular shopping trips to Bergdorf’s, and summers in the Hamptons. Ms. Rachelson was never wealthy, but for many years she worked as a project manager with an office-furniture company, living in a rent-stabilized apartment at 80th Street on Manhattan’s upscale Upper East Side. She had a closet full of well-made clothes and more than 100 pairs of shoes. “Everything had to be from Italy,” she says. “I have a good eye.” But then, two years ago, the economy began to falter, and Ms. Rachelson was restructured out of her job with the office-furniture company. She had never been out of work for more than a few weeks, so she was surprised when it took several months to find another job. She landed her next position, albeit a temporary one, as a result of her luxury shopping habits: She was hired as a sales specialist at Fortunoff, the jewelry and home retailer. “I’d been shopping there for years—I knew the products,” she says. When that holiday-season job ended, she wound up back on unemployment. Since then, she has been living on her unemployment payments, grateful for several extensions of the program’s time limits. She has had regular job interviews but no offers. ‘You Still Got That Basement?’ “Apparently, I’m unemployable,” she said recently with a wry humor that often belies how concerned she is. “I say to my friends, ‘Hey, you still got that basement?’ ” she said another day. “I make jokes.” So far, seven million jobs have been lost in the U.S. during this recession, according to the Department of Labor. The national unemployment rate climbed to 9.4% in May, and jobless rates are already in the double digits in Michigan, Ohio, California and other states. Discuss How have your lifestyle expenditures changed during the recession? The number of the long-term unemployed—people who, like Ms. Rachelson, have been jobless for 27 weeks or more—has tripled since the beginning of the recession to 3.9 million. Despite a few signs of economic improvement—such as rising home prices in parts of the country—most forecasts suggest the recession is far from over. By the time it does end, many of us are likely to have permanently altered the way we make daily consumer choices. For Ms. Rachelson, there are no more weekly manicures. The annual vacations to Acapulco and summers in the Hamptons with a rented car are a thing of her past. “I took a house in the Hamptons for 33 years,” she says. “For me, it symbolized a season. People don’t say, ‘How’s your winter?’ They ask, ‘What are you doing for the season?’ ” In those days, she used to call weeks in advance to secure reservations at the hottest restaurants, she recalls with relish. She ate in “anything that was new, all the new places,” she says. Now, she spends summer weekends in Manhattan. For fun, she sees her friends and goes to movie matinees, buying tickets with a senior-citizen discount. Ms. Rachelson has changed the way she thinks about shopping. Though she always liked a bargain, she used to shop without qualms. One time, a woman friend didn’t see a need for new shoes while the two were out shopping. “I said, ‘What are you talking about? Aren’t you a woman? Who needs anything?’ ” Ms. Rachelson says. ‘I Work the System’ Now, she has replaced shopping at Bergdorf’s and Bloomingdale’s with trips to Bed, Bath & Beyond. She asks friends to collect that store’s $5-off coupons, which she stores in a zippered pencil case full of coupons for makeup, toiletries and food. “I work the system,” she says. Indeed, she has become canny about maintaining her small luxuries. She cooks a lot now, but to replace her dinners out, she takes advantage of the $5.95 lunch specials at restaurants in her neighborhood, which are served until 5 p.m. Ms. Rachelson shows up at 4:50. “I get the lunch price for dinner,” she says. Maintaining her looks—finding ways to get her hair cut and colored, her makeup done—is a necessity when she’s job-hunting. But it’s also a point of pride: She’s been blond, pretty and vivacious all her life. Still, she has had to compromise. She recently replaced her professional highlights with $5.79 hair color she applies herself and buys her makeup at drugstores. A morning coffee at Starbucks, once a daily ritual, is now a carefully managed luxury. Each morning, Ms. Rachelson heads down to Starbucks carrying a cup of yogurt or a bowl of oatmeal. She buys the cheapest coffee for $2 and reads the paper for several hours (the shop’s personnel have never objected, she says). When she discovered a cracked tooth last month, Ms. Rachelson asked around until she discovered it’s possible to have the expensive repair work done at a discount at New York University’s dental school. She sold the 14-carat-gold jewelry she received for her “Sweet 16” birthday to raise money for the down payment on the $2,800 repair job and is currently trying to figure out how she’ll raise the remaining $1,400. It would be cheaper to simply have the tooth pulled, but she fears that having a missing tooth would make it even harder for her to land a job. Ms. Rachelson recently applied for a sales position at Bed, Bath & Beyond. “If I get through this,” she says, “I won’t return to that lifestyle. I don’t need 140 pairs of shoes. I need health care.” —Contact me at Christina.Binkley@wsj.com; Twitter.com/BinkleyOnStyle; or WSJ.com/Community. [less]
Add Your Comment
Recommended for You
-
From our blog
NYC Open Houses for November 19 and 20 - More from our blog
Most popular
-
20 Comments
-
139 Comments
-
47 Comments
-
16 Comments
-
25 Comments
Recommended for You
-
From our blog
NYC Open Houses for November 19 and 20 - More from our blog
"The transition has been harsh for Ms. Rachelson, a 58-year-old woman who once enjoyed daily restaurant meals, weekly manicures, regular shopping trips to Bergdorf’s, and summers in the Hamptons. Ms. Rachelson was never wealthy, but for many years she worked as a project manager with an office-furniture company, living in a rent-stabilized apartment at 80th Street on Manhattan’s upscale Upper East Side. She had a closet full of well-made clothes and more than 100 pairs of shoes."
It's apparently a good thing her landlord was subsidizing her housing. Her lifestyle on $57K was better than most people in this city who are making $157K.
I'm going to miss her when she leaves the neighborhood.
She sailed that big ship as if stormy weather never happens.
Then, instead of a life boat, she spent her money on snappy uniforms for the crew.
The captain always goes down with the ship.
As my old man would say, "the way you make your bed is how you sleep in it".
You probably think I'm some cold nasty guy with no feelings. I passed on many a prize and opted for long term security. When the moment came I was ready. Luck is the residue of design. Ms.Rachelson lived in a world of miss precieved reality and personal self indulgence. Now she expects the vendors and service persons in her neighborhood to do for her on the cheap because she lost her job (which is bad) and spent the bulk of her life spending like a sailor on shore leave.
Sex in the City is a TV show not a real life style. Even as a kid I knew Will Robinson did not live in space although I did think it was irresponsible of his parents to allow him to wonder off with Dr. Smith, who had pediphile written all over him. But, I digress.........
NYCMatt: For the record, her landlord did not subsidize her, I DID, AND SO DID ALL OTHER FOLKS PAYING MARKET RATES!
That's OK, the statutory renters are subsidizing our mortgage-interest deductions.
Sadly, this broad still hasn't learned, insisting on her luxuries & spending all she can as if those unemployment checks will last forever. Of course, that's assuming we believe a word of this tale 'cause you can't live like Ivana Trump on 57k, I don't care WHO you are.
It really sounds like she did not save one dime for retirement and/or rainy days. Maybe she expected to marry Mr. Big and live happily ever after. How could she sleep at night knowing that she had passed 50 without saving anything unless she expected Social Security to be sufficient to cover her "lifestyle"? Are all the people who did set money aside to pay for their healthcare and retirement expenses supposed to subsidize idiots like her? I guess that is the new America...in any event, she should not be living in a prime area of Manhattan.
It's easy to make fun of this woman - she's singing the white man's blues - but I feel for her. She's in culture shock. She doesn't think she's insisting on luxuries -- she doesn't know they're luxuries. If you've ever traveled to Europe or Asia, think of the time you first encountered a squat toilet in a nice restaurant.
I love squat toilets in nice restaurants!!
She's not wrong though, that it would be probably be harder to find a job if she had the tooth pulled, stopped dying and cutting her hair, and so forth. She's trying; I think the larger point being made here is that she wouldn't go back to that lifestyle even if she had the money coming in again. I hope that would be true for most people in a similar predicament, although honestly I think most Americans have really short memories. As soon as the economy bounces back, I'd bet that most would hop right back onto the debt hamster wheel without a second thought.
Her escapism with luxury goods and services quite didn't do it for her. In fact, the RC apt she kept probably kept her from being responsible. Who wants to continue to take handouts like food-stamps? If I were taking food stamps because I couldn't afford food, I would try to get into a place in my life where I could afford to feed myself. Doesn't this apply to housing?
Patient09, you are in fact correct. It's market-rate renters who are in effect subsidizing the rent-stabilized tenants.
And Trinityparent, you just said a mouthful: "It's easy to make fun of this woman - she's singing the white man's blues - but I feel for her. She's in culture shock. She doesn't think she's insisting on luxuries -- she doesn't know they're luxuries."
If I hear one more over-entitled New Yorker whine about being only "Middle Class" on their six-figure income because that's what it takes to live a "middle class" lifestyle in New York, I'm going to scream. The Middle Class does not send their kids to private schools, live in white-glove doorman Manhattan buildings,employ household help, or drive Mercedes-Benzes to their weekend homes in the Hamptons.
Hiring a nanny is a LUXURY. Private school is a LUXURY. Spa days are LUXURIES. Indeed, living in the most expensive borough in the most expensive city in the United States is a L U X U R Y.
When the sh*t storm hits it's time to suck up. Paint your nails, cook your food, brew your coffee, wear 'vintage', clean your pad, spend the weekend in Central Park. Move on. Don't whine in the public venue.
Of course, the press has to pick the least sympathetic case possible. Financial planning would have helped this woman 20+ years ago. A little late now. Even on a 100k salary and a RS or even "free" housing, I would not have a closet of 100+ pairs of shoes or shop at BG/summer in the Hamptons.
Falco, she won the "miss precieved reality" 2006 crown.