Skip Navigation

building at 301 East 52nd Street

Started by falcogold1
over 16 years ago
Posts: 4159
Member since: Sep 2008
any first hand knowlege regarding this building? Several properties interest me.
Response by aboutready
over 16 years ago
Posts: 16354
Member since: Oct 2007

be very careful regarding the maintenance. i think the ones listed involve seller rebates. look at the maintenance for similarly sized units that used to be on the market. building seems way too small and inexpensive for those levels. nothing has sold in years here.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by falcogold1
over 16 years ago
Posts: 4159
Member since: Sep 2008

seller rebates? what's that?
When I look at places 1500-1900sq/ft cc always seem to be 2400-3200/mo. It's a rare find that's below those kind of charges. Not impossible but, rare, am I wrong?
Do you mean the building is too small for that maintence?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by aboutready
over 16 years ago
Posts: 16354
Member since: Oct 2007

from unit 1C, maint. listed at $3600 a month, a bit larger lower floor, taken off the market. can't hurt to ask, but i'd say yes the building seems small and not desirable enough for that maintenance.

http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/378231-coop-301-east-52nd-street-sutton-place-new-york

Second floor 2,100 square foot home.Seller will abate maintenance. Beekman Townhouse, situated on a tree-lined block directly between Beekman and Sutton Place, is the historic former "Kips Bay Boys and Girls Club". This second floor loft home is the former gymnasium with over 10 foot ceilings throughout and a charming and sunny southern view of the trees outside. This truly special home...

Amenities: Doorman, Elevator, Pets Allowed

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by falcogold1
over 16 years ago
Posts: 4159
Member since: Sep 2008

I remember that place. great insight.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by sunny1
over 16 years ago
Posts: 1
Member since: Jun 2008

Does this building have a mold problem?
The New York Times October 15, 2006
“The case was brought by Colin and Pamela Fraser on behalf of themselves and their daughter, Alexandra, against the 301-52 Townhouse Corporation, which owned their co-op building. The Frasers contended that mold near windows and doors in their apartment caused respiratory problems, a rash and fatigue. The Frasers said that after moving into an apartment at 301 East 52nd Street in August 1996, Mr. Fraser developed a leg rash, lethargy and congestion and hearing, nasal and throat problems and Mrs. Fraser and their infant daughter developed respiratory problems.
The couple said their conditions improved when the family moved out of the apartment in 2002.”

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by falcogold1
over 16 years ago
Posts: 4159
Member since: Sep 2008

sunny1,
Get over here and collect your gold star.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by CoopAttorney
over 16 years ago
Posts: 1
Member since: Nov 2009

The lower court found there was no evidence to link the Frasers' alleged physical injuries to any mold in their apartment, and that finding was affirmed on appeal.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by ezraulo
over 10 years ago
Posts: 7
Member since: Nov 2009

I'm happy to report that that particular apartment (involved in the "mold" case) has now transferred to a lovely couple who plan on renovating the apartment.

I was the buyer agent for the apartment. Lots of twists and turns but all's well in the end.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by gothamsboro
over 10 years ago
Posts: 536
Member since: Sep 2013

One can only imagine what aboutready said that got it deleted.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment