Skip Navigation

calling all brokers - calling all brokers - read me now

Started by liquidpaper
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 309
Member since: Jan 2009
Discussion about
Bored enough to be trolling for apartments on the (gasp) East Side, and I stumbled onto this listing - http://www.corcoran.com/property/listing.aspx?Region=NYC&listingid=1868645 - Can everyone please click onto that link, and then hit that "click here to view all prpoerty photos in full screen" option. Is it just me being late to latest technology, or is that not the biggest improvement in... [more]
Response by 30yrs_RE_20_in_REO
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 9913
Member since: Mar 2009

I do have to say that I think for Manhattan brokerage houses, Corcoran has always been the sharp end of the stick when it comes to new webiste innovations.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by modern
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 887
Member since: Sep 2007

Prudential Douglas Elliman has something similar:

http://www.prudentialelliman.com/Listings.aspx?ListingID=1036283&utm_source=StreetEasy&utm_campaign=Agent&utm_medium=listings

Click on "Click here for a high-definition sideshow" and then "full screen".

Brokers should do this for all their listings, but most still think nicely arranged bananas on an HVAC unit are all that is needed to sell apartments.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by liquidpaper
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 309
Member since: Jan 2009

30 years -is it me, or do those photos make that listing much more interesting (the same agent has same feature available in another of her listings as well here - http://www.corcoran.com/property/listing.aspx?Region=NYC&ListingID=1872184 - I think wonderful to be able to see in such detail -

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by modern
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 887
Member since: Sep 2007

I see a problem, as when high def came to TV and newscasters found out their flaws were now visible. Botex treatments went way up.

Most apartments would be downright scary in high def.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by 30yrs_RE_20_in_REO
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 9913
Member since: Mar 2009

modern - this was a HUGE topic of discussion at AVN Summer Internext 2006.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by modern
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 887
Member since: Sep 2007

Yeah, porn is always at the forefront of new video technology. The real reason VHS defeated Betamax is Sony would not allow XXX videos on their tapes.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by falcogold1
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 4159
Member since: Sep 2008

LP,
Is it new b/c this is the first time for me and let's just say as first times go....it's a winner.
f'in amazing feature.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by liquidpaper
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 309
Member since: Jan 2009

it's much better than my first time was . . .

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by thedeuce
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 103
Member since: Feb 2009

whoa bookshelf. send that link to the built-ins thread.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by modern
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 887
Member since: Sep 2007

Wouldn't it be cool if we could read the spines on the books and discuss the owners tastes in literature? Anybody try zooming in on the books?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by patient09
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 1571
Member since: Nov 2008

modern: nice get on the bananas. Was that back when we were having fun with Bev at the unit in 201 E 80th.? Sq ft over stated, over priced and she wanted us to the comp leg work?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by mjsalisb
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 177
Member since: Sep 2006

Even on the really crappy netbook that I currently use, those photos were nice.
I Heart Technology

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by apt23
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 2041
Member since: Jul 2009

Here is a difference. In the corcoran listing, the feature is easy to find. In the prudential listing it is difficult to find even when looking for it. You have to read thru the dull broker blah blah before it is offered at the end. Don't brokers take marketing classes. Pictures have trumped text ever since People Magazine hit the stands. What is the point if you have high def pictures if no one sees them.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by 30yrs_RE_20_in_REO
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 9913
Member since: Mar 2009

apt23 = Peter Sellers?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by 30yrs_RE_20_in_REO
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 9913
Member since: Mar 2009

modern: you shouldn't go using big words that a lot of people on this site won't understand.... like "spine".

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by bjw2103
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 6236
Member since: Jul 2007

"modern: you shouldn't go using big words that a lot of people on this site won't understand.... like "spine"."

30yrs, I spewed a little water out my nose - thanks! Back on topic though, I think this is a great, great feature as well. I'm still surprised at how poor some online listings and websites are these days. Most potential buyers start their searches online these days (I think?), so having a quality, detailed listing is invaluable. I can't tell you how many times I've been disappointed by terrible lighting in photos, not to mention a complete lack of photos at all, an indecipherable floor plan, and no information on square footage or building amenities. For my money, I think Stribling is consistently the best with their listings - they are usually a joy to navigate, though I'd like to see this full screen photo thing catch on everywhere.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Ubottom
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 740
Member since: Apr 2009

wuttup that the place is all shuttered-up tight?
looks like a realtively hi-floor setback terrace--i always like to see hwat's out the windows--makes me think the view is awful

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10022
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 9868
Member since: Aug 2008

> The real reason VHS defeated Betamax is Sony would not allow XXX videos on their tapes.

The betamax thing is one of those urban legends, that it was this vastly superior technology that got screwed by marketing decisions. Its not quite true.

The storytellers always seem to conveniently leave this part out...

Standard Betmax tapes lasted 60 minutes — not long enough to record a movie.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10022
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 9868
Member since: Aug 2008

separately, the porn part itself might be another urban legend. wikipedia claims it, but try finding some factual documentation of this...

http://msgboard.snopes.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=30;t=002692;p=1

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by 30yrs_RE_20_in_REO
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 9913
Member since: Mar 2009

"1)Yeah, porn is always at the forefront of new video technology. 2)The real reason VHS defeated Betamax is Sony would not allow XXX videos on their tapes."

I think you need to separate statements 1 and 2. If 2 isn't true, it doesn't mean 1 isn't. One person's (interesting and I thing mostly correct) view on the fate of Sony Betamax:
http://www.geocities.com/athens/1401/betamax.html

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by lizyank
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 907
Member since: Oct 2006

VHS clearly won the consumer (1/2" inch) videotape market. However until very recently programming, and especially commericals were shown on Betamax 3/4" "broadcast quality" tape and players. Had Beta continued as a consumer product it may have benefitted from Sony's professional R&D, but not long enough for a movie....and no porn...(two things I just learned reading this thread)...doomed from the start. What was one supposed to do with a Betamax, record Sesame Street? (I was exceptionally proud of myself in that I could actually program my first--mid 80s--VHS VCR..."Hill Street" and the ballgame at the same time without compromise. Life was great!)

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10022
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 9868
Member since: Aug 2008

> I think you need to separate statements 1 and 2. If 2 isn't true, it doesn't mean 1 isn't.

True, but it doesn't really help the case at all.

DIVX vs. DVD - which was a HUGE debate and slowed down the adoption of either technology - wasn't decided by porn. I don't think it had much to do with blu ray debate either.

I actually think the statement is more applicable to online technology. Porn led in ecommerce, porn let in internet security, and porn also led in internet fraud.

But for video, I think ultimate the consortiums determine what to deliver to consumers...

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by 30yrs_RE_20_in_REO
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 9913
Member since: Mar 2009

but in the instant case, it was a MAJOR factor (and it was also a major factor in the closing of theaters which played adult films: it pretty much totally wiped them out. But replaced them with..... and on and on. Getting further off topic, one of the best "gotcha" lines i ever heard was back in my music business days. Some fairly good looking but airheaded girl was bragging about being a "movie star" when she had done like 2 walk-on parts with no lines. One of the band members quipped "I saw your last movie" and her eyes lit up until he finished with "but I missed the ending because I ran out of quarters).

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by apt23
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 2041
Member since: Jul 2009

30: Best gotcha line i ever heard -- I put myself thru college by cocktail waitressing. We wore very, very short shorts. There was a waitress who had supported 5 kids for years as a waitress -- her husband absconded with another woman. She still had a great view of life, was a good mother, a really hard worker, good earner and still sexy. I heard a guy come up to her and in a very lascivious voice say" Oooh honey, I would love to get in your pants" Without a moments hesitation, she shot back "Honey, one asshole in my pants is enough".

And, I love Peter Sellers. And Peter Sellars.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment