Stiglitz says we should've nationalized banks. He's half right
Started by Riversider
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 13573
Member since: Apr 2009
Discussion about
http://jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com/2009/11/obamas-economic-policy-has-doomed-us-to.html (We should have downsized them. Why reward failure) Bank Lending “We have this very strange situation today in America where we have given banks hundreds of billions of dollars and the president has to beg the banks to lend and they refuse,” Stiglitz said. “What we did was the wrong thing. It has weakened... [more]
http://jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com/2009/11/obamas-economic-policy-has-doomed-us-to.html
(We should have downsized them. Why reward failure)
Bank Lending
“We have this very strange situation today in America where we have given banks hundreds of billions of dollars and the president has to beg the banks to lend and they refuse,” Stiglitz said. “What we did was the wrong thing. It has weakened the economy and has increased our deficit, making it more difficult for the future.”
While the U.S. economy grew at a 3.5 percent annual rate in the third quarter, the first expansion in more than a year, the Columbia University economist said the recession is “nowhere near” its end, citing rising unemployment and weak demand.
The U.S. government plans to alter the way that a similar rescue would be handled in the future. Draft legislation proposes that banks, hedge funds and other financial firms holding more than $10 billion in assets would pay to rescue companies whose collapse would shake the financial system. (And it is an inherently unfair plan that creates even additional moral hazard by penalizing sound banking by forcing it to pay for reckless bank management. - Jesse)
[less]
Response by tandare
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 459
Member since: Jun 2008
Isn't this the argument that if the are "too big to fail" they are also "too big to exist"? (ergo, break them up, sharpen up regulation)
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by urbandigs
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 3629
Member since: Jan 2006
exactly the topic of a piece I worked on for tomorrow...but not this part. why is he saying banks should have lent more?
to who? a deteriorating credit quality US consumer that is already ridden with debt in a rising unemployment environment? makes no sense.
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by NYCMatt
almost 17 years ago
Posts: 7523
Member since: May 2009
No. We should have allowed the failing banks to die. We should also dismantle the Federal Reserve once and for all, so that we can give free market economics a real chance to succeed.
Isn't this the argument that if the are "too big to fail" they are also "too big to exist"? (ergo, break them up, sharpen up regulation)
exactly the topic of a piece I worked on for tomorrow...but not this part. why is he saying banks should have lent more?
to who? a deteriorating credit quality US consumer that is already ridden with debt in a rising unemployment environment? makes no sense.
No. We should have allowed the failing banks to die. We should also dismantle the Federal Reserve once and for all, so that we can give free market economics a real chance to succeed.