Skip Navigation

Cannon Point North

Started by JimSmith
over 16 years ago
Posts: 4
Member since: Jan 2010
25 & 45 Sutton place South owe approximately $40mm to the city of New York. The amount is for structural repair work that was done a few years ago by the City for the portion of their foundation that extends over FDR. The parties have been in litigation regarding who should pay for the remedial costs. Assume the remedial costs will be allocated equally based on total number of units in both buildings. This translates into approximately $67,000 per unit.
Response by ANDYOH
about 15 years ago
Posts: 23
Member since: Nov 2009

any body know the latest on the negotiations with the city over the highway work. has the assessment been negotiated down?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by alanhart
about 15 years ago
Posts: 12397
Member since: Feb 2007

Why would the assessment be negotiated down for work done to safeguard a building's foundation?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
about 15 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

It's still in court. As far as I can tell, an appeals court said that Cannon Point North (and South) do own the platform over the FDR on which they're built, but did not say that CPN and CPS were responsible for its maintenance.

The notes to each co-op's financials should give the current status of the litigation, and probably say how much it's cost so far, etc.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by mmomommomo
over 14 years ago
Posts: 1
Member since: Mar 2011

Does anyone know the latest status of the law suit?
Steve

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by lleibowitz
over 14 years ago
Posts: 2
Member since: Jan 2009

Law suit just settled! Want details? Call me... Lorna Leibowitz, VP Prudential Douglas Elliman. 917.992.5350.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Brooks2
over 14 years ago
Posts: 2970
Member since: Aug 2011

why not just post it?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by janejamison
about 14 years ago
Posts: 1
Member since: Feb 2012

I agree, why not post it. What is the final impact on apartment holders in each building?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by murphandpat
about 14 years ago
Posts: 1
Member since: Mar 2010

Anyone know the latest status of the lawsuit? Was it settled? Should you buy in this building?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by KrankyPants
about 11 years ago
Posts: 5
Member since: Nov 2014

This building also requires buyers to hold a minimum of 1.5x the purchase price in liquid assets. The terms "snooty" and "crusty" could quite fairly be applied to this board.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment