Skip Navigation

(BN) Vermont Congressman Welch Proposes 50% Tax on Bonuses (Update1)

Started by marco_m
about 16 years ago
Posts: 2481
Member since: Dec 2008
Discussion about
By Ryan J. Donmoyer Jan. 12 (Bloomberg) -- Vermont U.S. Representative Peter Welch proposed a 50 percent tax on employee bonuses exceeding $50,000 at banks that received bailout funds from the Troubled Asset Relief Program. Legislation introduced today by Welch, a Democrat, would use revenue generated by the tax to fund a new Small Business Administration lending program. He said he modeled his... [more]
Response by w67thstreet
about 16 years ago
Posts: 9003
Member since: Dec 2008

Pkutina. The fallacy or truth lies in this simple question. R there a million ppl that can fill the job of a banker, geitner, CEO of ml, CEO of jpm and in fact it's a game of musical chair and whoever sits in that chair gets paid gobs of money or is it the individual who 'creates' net income for the firm thereby justifiably charging society her income for this 'benefit' to society?

To me the fact not a one financial/ regulator/ Warren etc etc saw this and shitstorm coming and they are all still in their positions tells me they know not what they do, but just grabbed the 'right' chair. IMHO.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Riversider
about 16 years ago
Posts: 13572
Member since: Apr 2009

Somewhereelse.
great comment about the socialism. Also wouldn't be surprised if the same posters got their news from E and the Post.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Riversider
about 16 years ago
Posts: 13572
Member since: Apr 2009

This is not really a tax, but an increase in borrowing costs for their riskiest assets.

Bingo. Government is selling insurance. Thats not a new thing. In this case, they were already providing the insurance, difference now is they are charging
-------------

This is the administrations fault. For once they are doing something right, and they screw it up by not explaining it properly. I bet the average person thinks we're taxing bonuses.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by somewhereelse
about 16 years ago
Posts: 7435
Member since: Oct 2009

well, I think thats intentional. The administration WANTS folks to think they're taxing bonuses, so Obama gets credit for fighting the largesse. Hell, his speech on the tax specifically mentions the bonuses!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by somewhereelse
about 16 years ago
Posts: 7435
Member since: Oct 2009

"great comment about the socialism. Also wouldn't be surprised if the same posters got their news from E and the Post."

thanks, and ha, ha... yes. In general, my pet peeve is the knee jerk "I only read the headline and I'm pissed stuff". Its the stuff both parties do, and it makes their stupid bases even stupider.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Riversider
about 16 years ago
Posts: 13572
Member since: Apr 2009

have to agree there. They are reacting to the outrage. Afraid they will lose in '12.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment