(BN) Vermont Congressman Welch Proposes 50% Tax on Bonuses (Update1)
Started by marco_m
about 16 years ago
Posts: 2481
Member since: Dec 2008
Discussion about
By Ryan J. Donmoyer Jan. 12 (Bloomberg) -- Vermont U.S. Representative Peter Welch proposed a 50 percent tax on employee bonuses exceeding $50,000 at banks that received bailout funds from the Troubled Asset Relief Program. Legislation introduced today by Welch, a Democrat, would use revenue generated by the tax to fund a new Small Business Administration lending program. He said he modeled his... [more]
By Ryan J. Donmoyer
Jan. 12 (Bloomberg) -- Vermont U.S. Representative Peter
Welch proposed a 50 percent tax on employee bonuses exceeding
$50,000 at banks that received bailout funds from the Troubled
Asset Relief Program.
Legislation introduced today by Welch, a Democrat, would
use revenue generated by the tax to fund a new Small Business
Administration lending program. He said he modeled his plan
after bonus taxes adopted in the U.K. and France.
“As most Americans struggle to endure a long and wrenching
recession, the same Wall Street bankers who came to the American
taxpayer with hat in hand are now preparing to pocket record-
breaking bonuses,” Welch said in a statement. “Financial firms
that received taxpayer assistance must remember that they owe
their return to profitability to hardworking Americans.”
Profits at financial institutions, which begin reporting
earnings later this week, have rebounded and may triple by 2011,
according to analyst surveys compiled by Bloomberg News.
Charlotte, North Carolina-based Bank of America Corp., the
biggest U.S. lender, said last week it expects to pay record
bonuses to some investment bankers.
The tax would apply to all bonus compensation in the form
of cash and stock that exceeds $50,000, said Welch’s spokesman,
Paul Heintz.
The House of Representatives on March 19 adopted by a vote
of 328-93 a 90 percent tax on bonuses paid by American
International Group Inc. and other companies that got bailouts.
The measure stalled in the Senate, where a 70 percent tax was
proposed by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, a
Democrat, and Republicans Charles Grassley of Iowa and Olympia
Snowe of Maine.
[less]
Response by w67thstreet
about 16 years ago
Posts: 9003
Member since: Dec 2008
Pkutina. The fallacy or truth lies in this simple question. R there a million ppl that can fill the job of a banker, geitner, CEO of ml, CEO of jpm and in fact it's a game of musical chair and whoever sits in that chair gets paid gobs of money or is it the individual who 'creates' net income for the firm thereby justifiably charging society her income for this 'benefit' to society?
To me the fact not a one financial/ regulator/ Warren etc etc saw this and shitstorm coming and they are all still in their positions tells me they know not what they do, but just grabbed the 'right' chair. IMHO.
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by Riversider
about 16 years ago
Posts: 13572
Member since: Apr 2009
Somewhereelse.
great comment about the socialism. Also wouldn't be surprised if the same posters got their news from E and the Post.
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by Riversider
about 16 years ago
Posts: 13572
Member since: Apr 2009
This is not really a tax, but an increase in borrowing costs for their riskiest assets.
Bingo. Government is selling insurance. Thats not a new thing. In this case, they were already providing the insurance, difference now is they are charging
-------------
This is the administrations fault. For once they are doing something right, and they screw it up by not explaining it properly. I bet the average person thinks we're taxing bonuses.
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by somewhereelse
about 16 years ago
Posts: 7435
Member since: Oct 2009
well, I think thats intentional. The administration WANTS folks to think they're taxing bonuses, so Obama gets credit for fighting the largesse. Hell, his speech on the tax specifically mentions the bonuses!
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by somewhereelse
about 16 years ago
Posts: 7435
Member since: Oct 2009
"great comment about the socialism. Also wouldn't be surprised if the same posters got their news from E and the Post."
thanks, and ha, ha... yes. In general, my pet peeve is the knee jerk "I only read the headline and I'm pissed stuff". Its the stuff both parties do, and it makes their stupid bases even stupider.
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by Riversider
about 16 years ago
Posts: 13572
Member since: Apr 2009
have to agree there. They are reacting to the outrage. Afraid they will lose in '12.
Pkutina. The fallacy or truth lies in this simple question. R there a million ppl that can fill the job of a banker, geitner, CEO of ml, CEO of jpm and in fact it's a game of musical chair and whoever sits in that chair gets paid gobs of money or is it the individual who 'creates' net income for the firm thereby justifiably charging society her income for this 'benefit' to society?
To me the fact not a one financial/ regulator/ Warren etc etc saw this and shitstorm coming and they are all still in their positions tells me they know not what they do, but just grabbed the 'right' chair. IMHO.
Somewhereelse.
great comment about the socialism. Also wouldn't be surprised if the same posters got their news from E and the Post.
This is not really a tax, but an increase in borrowing costs for their riskiest assets.
Bingo. Government is selling insurance. Thats not a new thing. In this case, they were already providing the insurance, difference now is they are charging
-------------
This is the administrations fault. For once they are doing something right, and they screw it up by not explaining it properly. I bet the average person thinks we're taxing bonuses.
well, I think thats intentional. The administration WANTS folks to think they're taxing bonuses, so Obama gets credit for fighting the largesse. Hell, his speech on the tax specifically mentions the bonuses!
"great comment about the socialism. Also wouldn't be surprised if the same posters got their news from E and the Post."
thanks, and ha, ha... yes. In general, my pet peeve is the knee jerk "I only read the headline and I'm pissed stuff". Its the stuff both parties do, and it makes their stupid bases even stupider.
have to agree there. They are reacting to the outrage. Afraid they will lose in '12.