Skip Navigation

Creditor Said to Seek Stuyvesant Town Manager Removal

Started by notadmin
about 16 years ago
Posts: 3835
Member since: Jul 2008
Discussion about
AR, this might interest you: By David M. Levitt and Jonathan Keehner Jan. 22 (Bloomberg) -- A Stuyvesant Town-Peter Cooper Village creditor is seeking to remove Tishman Speyer Properties LP as manager of the property, Manhattan’s largest apartment complex, according to three people familiar with the matter. Tishman, which bought the 80-acre property with BlackRock Realty Inc. in 2006 for $5.4... [more]
Response by aboutready
about 16 years ago
Posts: 16354
Member since: Oct 2007

there's some weird stuff going on here right now. i had heard about the mezzanine debt holders intentions, but not about the effort to remove TS. TS, from what i've heard and read, has been disseminating some very strange information to new renters, indicating that they will be going back to court, that their leases are "market rate with some RS protections," etc.

thanks for the post.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by notadmin
about 16 years ago
Posts: 3835
Member since: Jul 2008

watching how this unfolds is interesting. there are many landlords with over leveraged RS buildings running negative cash flows (predatory equity gone bust). it might shred light into what's gonna happen with these other buildings.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by julia
about 16 years ago
Posts: 2841
Member since: Feb 2007

Ar....when the rental agents called me (twice) about an apartment they said the leases were marketrate. I wonder if cccharley signed a lease for the apartment.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by cccharley
about 16 years ago
Posts: 903
Member since: Sep 2008

Julia I signed a lease at the so called stabilized rate - not sure had they got to that. They said we pay the lesser of the 2 - stabilized or market rent - they considered market rate some foolish number over $3k then took 2 months free and prorated it. They offered a 2 year at around 3-4% more per month. I took a one year because who knows if I'll like it, what's going to happen, if they release all those other apts they are sitting on -I really want a 2br so maybe if they leave I'll have a better chance at getting one. I'm taking the wait and see approach - I'm sure there are some cheap stabilized 2brs sitting empty. I'm moving Monday - AR are you coming over? I'll be there around noon

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by julia
about 16 years ago
Posts: 2841
Member since: Feb 2007

cccharley...good luck with your move...I hope I'll be there by next year.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by cccharley
about 16 years ago
Posts: 903
Member since: Sep 2008

Julia - then we'll have party time. That would be great. So much can change. I'm also going to check the rental history on my apartment. I think they did cheaper kitchen renovations than the put in - I have no recessed lighting and all these things listed. Once I'm in there I'll do my research. Maybe I can get my rent down. It's actually on the high side from what I heard others are paying for a 1br and on the worst part of the property. The apt itself is very nice but the view stinks. I didn't have much choice. Took the cheapest available when I got called. So I called yesterday and asked if anything else came up - they said they have almost no inventory - what are they doing with those 800 other apartments? They are such liars. I know a bunch of apts will come up after Feb 1 because of lease renewals. Hey maybe you'll get a 3rd call.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by aboutready
about 16 years ago
Posts: 16354
Member since: Oct 2007

cccharley, i'm there. and now i think i get it. julia, there has been a LOT of turnover with some of the one bedrooms. NYU central. every time there has been a vacancy, under the RS rules, the rent is allowed to increase a fairly healthy percentage. which means that many of the RS rents for the one bedroom units are actually HIGHER than the market rent. they ARE charging market rate, and it is lower than the RS rate. they have to tell you this because in the future they have the right to increase the rent to the RS level plus the yearly RS increases. obviously do NOT rent one of these units. also obviously, these units are the more valuable to them, and they'd like to get them filled first.

there are a ton of units that have had few or no prior occupancies. just stay on the list.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment