Skip Navigation

Goldman bearish on NYC

Started by somewhereelse
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 7435
Member since: Oct 2009
Discussion about
>> Greg David blog: Goldman bearish on NYC Goldman Sachs proved Monday that it is pessimistic about the city's rebound prospects, according to Crain's columnist Greg David. http://www.crainsnewyork.com/article/20100202/FREE/100209972/1123
Response by samadams
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 592
Member since: Jul 2009

I saw that also. Thats a very long term project , so that means they have are long term bears on nyc

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by marco_m
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 2481
Member since: Dec 2008

If gs even thought this could make money at any point they'd be involved. This project must already be screwed .

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by somewhereelse
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 7435
Member since: Oct 2009

its reminding me more and more of the city I grew up in, where announced projects had, what, a 10% chance of actually being built.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by alanhart
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 12397
Member since: Feb 2007

The 4th largest city in America?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Tomdoyle
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 22
Member since: Apr 2007

The statement bearish on NYC is very misleading. I think they are bearish on such an expensive MEGA project in a neighborhood where there is little demand, aesthetically ugly, and inconvenient. They obviously don't imaagine a forseeable return on the project not on NYC in general.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Rhino86
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 4925
Member since: Sep 2006

Right but if this were a bottom, wouldnt this be the time? They are no fools. Why weren't they bears before? Because at least they can recognize a bubble after the fact, unlike the bulls on this board.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by somewhereelse
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 7435
Member since: Oct 2009

" I think they are bearish on such an expensive MEGA project in a neighborhood where there is little demand, aesthetically ugly, and inconvenient"

How much of that is relevant. Its ugly, so what, they get to build whatever they want from scratch over as close to virgin land as it gets. Inconvenient.... they're getting a subway stop (or two) just to make it more convenient, and I think it gets its own monorail.

Yes, NOW its crap, but the plan builds an entirely new neighborhood.

And, as rhino said, it was the case before as well. But they decided to make the bet last year, they just won't make it anymore. The neighborhood didn't change, the RE market did.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by SkinnyNsweet
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 408
Member since: Jun 2006

Did somebody say "MONORAIL"?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by w67thstreet
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 9003
Member since: Dec 2008

Did someone say "AUTOMOBILE?"

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment