Obama's Taxes on foreign profits might cost u.s. jobs.....
Started by Riversider
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 13572
Member since: Apr 2009
Discussion about
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748704022804575041253835415076.html Deep in the president's budget released Monday—in Table S-8 on page 161—appear a set of proposals headed "Reform U.S. International Tax System." If these proposals are enacted, U.S.-based multinational firms will face $122.2 billion in tax increases over the next decade. This is a natural follow-up to President Obama's... [more]
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748704022804575041253835415076.html
Deep in the president's budget released Monday—in Table S-8 on page 161—appear a set of proposals headed "Reform U.S. International Tax System." If these proposals are enacted, U.S.-based multinational firms will face $122.2 billion in tax increases over the next decade. This is a natural follow-up to President Obama's sweeping plan announced last May entitled "Leveling the Playing Field: Curbing Tax Havens and Removing Tax Incentives for Shifting Jobs Overseas."
The fundamental assumption behind these proposals is that U.S. multinationals expand abroad only to "export" jobs out of the country. Thus, taxing their foreign operations more would boost tax revenues here and create desperately needed U.S. jobs.
-----------------------------------------------------
When parent firms based in the U.S. hire workers in their foreign affiliates, the skills and occupations of these workers are often complementary; they aren't substitutes. More hiring abroad stimulates more U.S. hiring. For example, as Wal-Mart has opened stores abroad, it has created hundreds of U.S. jobs for workers to coordinate the distribution of goods world-wide. The expansion of these foreign affiliates—whether to serve foreign customers, or to save costs—also expands the overall scale of multinationals.
Expanding abroad also allows firms to refine their scope of activities. For example, exporting routine production means that employees in the U.S. can focus on higher value-added tasks such as R&D, marketing and general management.
[less]
Response by NYCMatt
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 7523
Member since: May 2009
"The expansion of these foreign affiliates—whether to serve foreign customers, or to save costs—also expands the overall scale of multinationals."
That's not always a good thing. Bigger is actually rarely better.
***
"Expanding abroad also allows firms to refine their scope of activities. For example, exporting routine production means that employees in the U.S. can focus on higher value-added tasks such as R&D, marketing and general management."
That's fine for the educated upper class living in America.
What about Joe Sixpack? He's now expected to move to India to work on the manufacturing end of IBM?
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by notadmin
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 3835
Member since: Jul 2008
companies like halliburton, that have for practical purposes their headquarters abroad (dubai), will end up incorporating the company abroad to avoid this tax?
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by notadmin
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 3835
Member since: Jul 2008
companies like halliburton, that have for practical purposes their headquarters abroad (dubai), will end up incorporating the company abroad to avoid this tax?
"The expansion of these foreign affiliates—whether to serve foreign customers, or to save costs—also expands the overall scale of multinationals."
That's not always a good thing. Bigger is actually rarely better.
***
"Expanding abroad also allows firms to refine their scope of activities. For example, exporting routine production means that employees in the U.S. can focus on higher value-added tasks such as R&D, marketing and general management."
That's fine for the educated upper class living in America.
What about Joe Sixpack? He's now expected to move to India to work on the manufacturing end of IBM?
companies like halliburton, that have for practical purposes their headquarters abroad (dubai), will end up incorporating the company abroad to avoid this tax?
companies like halliburton, that have for practical purposes their headquarters abroad (dubai), will end up incorporating the company abroad to avoid this tax?