Skip Navigation

Murray Hill Classic Six for $830K...aberration?

Started by jimbo369
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 17
Member since: Feb 2008
Discussion about
http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/383841-coop-138-east-36th-street-murray-hill-new-york Listed at 898K, closed for $830K. It needs total renovation, but the price still seems amazingly low. Is this a one-off or do you think there are the occasional Classic Sixes for under $1 mill?
Response by UWSer
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 158
Member since: Feb 2009

Is this a 50% down building with a particular board that will cause the reno to take 2 years?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by mrsbuffet
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 134
Member since: Nov 2006

Is this the midtown tunnel feeder street? If so, it's smog and soot city. Location, location, location...

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Hugh_G
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 223
Member since: Aug 2009

It's the future...comes out to $615/sq ft, maybe a little more when you consider how every listing broker in this city LIES about sq. ft. This needs reno and that knocks the price down a good bit, but still we're not far away from a time when 2 br's will sell at $700-800/sq ft. 18 months maybe, 2 yrs...

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by manhattanfox
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 1275
Member since: Sep 2007

This is not a standard classic 6 -- 1350 sq ft? Normally 1800 sq ft. Plus a huge reno needed and a less than prime location.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NYCMatt
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 7523
Member since: May 2009

Why does it need renovation?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Rhino86
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 4925
Member since: Sep 2006

1800 is not a normal classic six. More like 1500.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by happyrenter
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 2790
Member since: Oct 2008

all of this happened last june--it closed in june, so not exactly breaking news.

focus on the square footage, not the number of rooms. 650 per square foot for an unpleasant block (tunnel traffic) in a mediocre neighborhood, which requires a gut renovation.

looking at the comps, it appears that this line sold 1.25 at the peak. but assuming that apartment did not need the complete gut that this one requires, it is a pretty modest decline compared to many we've seen.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NYCMatt
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 7523
Member since: May 2009

"which requires a gut renovation."

No it doesn't.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by RE2009
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 474
Member since: Apr 2009

I lived on 36 and had a terrible time selling my place because of the street. Even though it was factored into the price people really, really hate that street... But what I will say if you travel a lot it's fantastic.. You can be at JFK in 20mins (best case of course). Resale is a b-tch!!!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by front_porch
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 5320
Member since: Mar 2008

Maintenance on the high side too.

ali r.
{downtown broker}

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Miette
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 316
Member since: Jan 2009

$1.35 per square foot is on the high side for a doorman building in Manhattan?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by jimbo369
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 17
Member since: Feb 2008

thanks for all the comments...I agree with the location issue, although I don't think it's too bad....but the fact is you can only find the perfect apt if you are willing to pay the top price for it. I thnk getting a 830K classic six that you can take your time renovating, seems to be a decent deal...

The maintenance is not high per square foot...

If anyone comes across anything similar, please do post on this board...I would love to have a classic six for under #$1mil, with warts/defects and all....because I won't be able to afford one in a pristine conidition on Park Avenue in the 60s or 70s!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Rhino86
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 4925
Member since: Sep 2006

Right, its not as bad a location or in as bad condition as some of the market apologists suggests. This is really just foreshadowing of where smallish classic sixes all over town are heading.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by happyrenter
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 2790
Member since: Oct 2008

rhino,

i am no apologist for the market as you know. but honestly, a 1300 square foot classic six is not "small-ish." it is small, no ish about it. this apartment also happens to be on a bad block in a mediocre neighborhood. it also happens to require a huge amount of work.

even at the peak these apartments only traded for 1.25, and as far as i know that was in good condition. so this is just not a lot of movement compared to a lot of what we have seen.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Rhino86
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 4925
Member since: Sep 2006

I disagree that 1800 is standard size for a class six. I think its more like 1500. So yes, I would call 1350 sqft smallish. Also, $830k is -34% from $1.25mm, and its still an ask. We can barely get people to agree that this market is down 25%, and this is down another 10% from there...and its an ask. So I disagree. I do think this is interesting.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by front_porch
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 5320
Member since: Mar 2008

Miette,

I say "high side" because you're not getting a FT doorman for your money.

ali r.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment

Most popular

  1. 25 Comments