My wife was like hey, look at this listing. it's our old L Schier.... you will note, $310K in 1995, $1.5MM in 2005, $1.9MM in 2008.... currently at $1.65MM or 2005 price. No bites.... imputed 2003 price is $1.1MM... who wants to catch this falling knife?
08/15/1995
Previous Sale recorded for $310,000.
08/15/1996
Previous Sale recorded for $370,000.
02/04/2005
Previous Sale recorded for $1,475,000.
08/22/2008
Previously Listed by Corcoran at $1,995,000.
11/03/2008
Delisted temporarily by Corcoran. Last priced at $1,749,000.
06/04/2010
Listed by Corcoran at $1,750,000.
06/22/2010
Price decreased by 6% to $1,650,000
Response by inonada
over 15 years ago
Posts: 7952
Member since: Oct 2008
Do you remember the Shire, Mr. Frodo?
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by w67thstreet
over 15 years ago
Posts: 9003
Member since: Dec 2008
The shire is beautiful this time of year.. Schier, is a shill who is completely missing the bubble popping... if I could nominate one borker who is completely cluesless to pricing, it is he. I seek lembas.. I am hungry
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by stevejhx
over 15 years ago
Posts: 12656
Member since: Feb 2008
HAHAHAHA! Dining room and living room with NO WINDOWS! Glass brick wall.
Luv-a-lee.
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by inonada
over 15 years ago
Posts: 7952
Member since: Oct 2008
I think Schier served lembas at the last open house.
On pricing, I'm willing to bet that he'd be happy if the owners allowed him to list at $1M.
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by JuiceMan
over 15 years ago
Posts: 3578
Member since: Aug 2007
1662 sqft my ass. steve must have calculated for them
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by squarefoot
over 15 years ago
Posts: 49
Member since: Oct 2008
wow, all that and an atrium and about $3k in monthlies!? who will be the lucky new owner?
i looked up atrium because i thought they may have made a mistake:
1. the open main court of a Roman house
2. a central often glass-roofed hall that extends through several storeys in a building, such as a shopping centre or hotel
3. a court in front of an early Christian or medieval church, esp one flanked by colonnades
4. anatomy a cavity or chamber in the body, esp the upper chamber of each half of the heart
[C17: from Latin; related to āter black, perhaps originally referring to the part of the house that was blackened by smoke from the hearth]
hmmm, i dont think definitions 1-4 didnt really work, maybe the latin origin? possibly the crack that the broker or owner was smoking when they came up with the apartment description led to a fire (which is not funny, fires are not funny), and calling the blackened area of the apartment “atrium” seemed that much more legit?
If anyone knows how they called this “atrium” or the source of the drugs that they were on when they came up with the description, let me know
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by walterh7
over 15 years ago
Posts: 383
Member since: Dec 2006
I wonder about buildings and brokers like this. There are a couple of brokers who dominate in specific buildings. Typically they live there and up until 2007/8 had been able to get buyers to pay up, and up, and up, rather consistently. Sellers and owners were, of course, quite pleased. And I'm sure the boards were quite self-content believing they had run their building in such a fantastic fashion as to garner consistently higher prices.
But now that the worm has turned. Sellers won't face reality. Boards may be reluctant to approve sales (or just won't sellers list at the prices that will clear the market), and the broker who turned everyone's apartment into gold is now the village idiot. From my seat in front of the screen I can't tell if the broker can't price, or the forces they built up are now conspiring against them. Or both. It is an un-healthy ecosystem and when I see it in a building, I'm far less likely to give an apartment for sale in that building much consideration.
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by walterh7
over 15 years ago
Posts: 383
Member since: Dec 2006
I realize that The Level Club is a condo, but I think some of the same dynamics apply, minus the board.
Ignored comment.
Unhide
Response by stevejhx
over 15 years ago
Posts: 12656
Member since: Feb 2008
Poor JuiceMan - can't get over the fact that he's going to have to move his apartment over to the far west side to double his equity to $38,000.
Do you remember the Shire, Mr. Frodo?
The shire is beautiful this time of year.. Schier, is a shill who is completely missing the bubble popping... if I could nominate one borker who is completely cluesless to pricing, it is he. I seek lembas.. I am hungry
HAHAHAHA! Dining room and living room with NO WINDOWS! Glass brick wall.
Luv-a-lee.
I think Schier served lembas at the last open house.
On pricing, I'm willing to bet that he'd be happy if the owners allowed him to list at $1M.
1662 sqft my ass. steve must have calculated for them
wow, all that and an atrium and about $3k in monthlies!? who will be the lucky new owner?
i looked up atrium because i thought they may have made a mistake:
1. the open main court of a Roman house
2. a central often glass-roofed hall that extends through several storeys in a building, such as a shopping centre or hotel
3. a court in front of an early Christian or medieval church, esp one flanked by colonnades
4. anatomy a cavity or chamber in the body, esp the upper chamber of each half of the heart
[C17: from Latin; related to āter black, perhaps originally referring to the part of the house that was blackened by smoke from the hearth]
hmmm, i dont think definitions 1-4 didnt really work, maybe the latin origin? possibly the crack that the broker or owner was smoking when they came up with the apartment description led to a fire (which is not funny, fires are not funny), and calling the blackened area of the apartment “atrium” seemed that much more legit?
If anyone knows how they called this “atrium” or the source of the drugs that they were on when they came up with the description, let me know
I wonder about buildings and brokers like this. There are a couple of brokers who dominate in specific buildings. Typically they live there and up until 2007/8 had been able to get buyers to pay up, and up, and up, rather consistently. Sellers and owners were, of course, quite pleased. And I'm sure the boards were quite self-content believing they had run their building in such a fantastic fashion as to garner consistently higher prices.
But now that the worm has turned. Sellers won't face reality. Boards may be reluctant to approve sales (or just won't sellers list at the prices that will clear the market), and the broker who turned everyone's apartment into gold is now the village idiot. From my seat in front of the screen I can't tell if the broker can't price, or the forces they built up are now conspiring against them. Or both. It is an un-healthy ecosystem and when I see it in a building, I'm far less likely to give an apartment for sale in that building much consideration.
I realize that The Level Club is a condo, but I think some of the same dynamics apply, minus the board.
Poor JuiceMan - can't get over the fact that he's going to have to move his apartment over to the far west side to double his equity to $38,000.