Aboutready still trying for treble damages
Started by brickcounty
almost 16 years ago
Posts: 6
Member since: Oct 2010
Discussion about
Fresh hope for StuyTown renter windfall by A. Ready | 10/20/10 - 7:45 AM e-mail talk tweet StuyTown residents woke up this morning to a rather amazing letter posted in their lobbies from city council member and co-resident Dan Garodnick. "While this seems like a never-ending saga," he writes, "[w]e have reason to be hopeful." There were plenty of interesting messages. A few highlights: •"CW... [more]
Fresh hope for StuyTown renter windfall by A. Ready | 10/20/10 - 7:45 AM e-mail talk tweet StuyTown residents woke up this morning to a rather amazing letter posted in their lobbies from city council member and co-resident Dan Garodnick. "While this seems like a never-ending saga," he writes, "[w]e have reason to be hopeful." There were plenty of interesting messages. A few highlights: •"CW Capital [the current loan servicer, appointed after the default of the landlord, Tishman Speyer] has already expressed its support for doing a non-eviction conversion." Translation: It looks like renters will be able to continue renting, and those wishing to buy will likely be given the opportunity. (Cue champagne corks.) •"[A]ny successful plan will have to be a good deal for the tenants, and will have to protect renters who decide not to buy." Translation: Monthly carrying costs (mortgage, maintenance, taxes) will need to be roughly equivalent to current rents. •"[W]e will work directly with CW Capital toward a negotiated outcome of all issues--including the claims in the Roberts v. Tishman Speyer case, which still entitle many tenants to considerable damages [for rent overpayments]." Translation: Someone who has been overcharged by $2,000 a month for four years could be due $96,000--or more if the courts determine damages should be trebled. Related posts: WINDFALL!! A look at StuyTown's proposed insider prices StuyTown auction (and windfall dreams) delayed [less]
OK,
I was curious,so pulled up brick underground for the first time and looked at her columns.
1) The columns themselves are concicse, to the point and well written(and no cursing!)
2) The moderated responses were a little opinionated in a bad way(sensed grand standing)
3) Doesn't seem like anyone reads it yet based on responses/comments. It's missing something that fails
to draw the reader in(doesn't feel sticky)
Given time, it could get better and more interesting. Best luck in your new venture.