Skip Navigation

Stupidity and the mortgage crisis

Started by Riversider
almost 15 years ago
Posts: 13573
Member since: Apr 2009
Discussion about
With all the evil banker stories it's important to remember the housing crisis was also made possible by Les Meyers & Tom LeTendre. ------------------------------ Les Meyers, 74, spent a half century in real estate in Indiana and Illinois before moving to Arizona. Five years ago, he and his wife bought a $330,000 home with two bedrooms and a den and then spent an additional $70,000 improving... [more]
Response by NYCMatt
almost 15 years ago
Posts: 7523
Member since: May 2009

Unless these two homebuyers somehow put a gun to the bankers' heads, it's the BANKERS who extended the mortgages in the first place.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Riversider
almost 15 years ago
Posts: 13573
Member since: Apr 2009

So I guess if i buy a corvette that i can't afford its the car dealers fault?

One can only blame the bankers if they mis-represented the mortgage terms or doctored up the borrowers mortgage application. Otherwise these were stupid borrowers. And the Les Meyers story looks fishy.
Hes 74 earned 300k the prior year and suddenly has no money? Why someone like that is leveraging up at that age is beyond me. And how he went broke after one house with that prior salary is a story untold.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NYCMatt
almost 15 years ago
Posts: 7523
Member since: May 2009

"So I guess if i buy a corvette that i can't afford its the car dealers fault?"

Apples and oranges.

The car dealer is SELLING a CAR.

The banker is EXTENDING a LOAN.

Your failure to see this distinction is troubling.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Riversider
almost 15 years ago
Posts: 13573
Member since: Apr 2009

No, the banker is selling money

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Riversider
almost 15 years ago
Posts: 13573
Member since: Apr 2009

And the cost of money is interest.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by jordyn
almost 15 years ago
Posts: 820
Member since: Dec 2007

If a bank doesn't understand how to do reasonable risk assessment, they reap what they deserve when they get higher than expected default rates.

This doesn't mean the people taking the loans should be off the hook, but banks were ridiculously complicit in the problem.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Riversider
almost 15 years ago
Posts: 13573
Member since: Apr 2009

Agree, the borrower is obligated to pay, and if they cannot lose their home. If the borrower can't pay and the home is insufficient security, then agreed the bank was stupid.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment