Skip Navigation
StreetEasy Logo

Index Expected to Show New Low in House Prices

Started by sjtmd
over 14 years ago
Posts: 670
Member since: May 2009
Discussion about
It is official, the new bottom is here. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/31/business/31housing.html?hp
Response by Riversider
over 14 years ago
Posts: 13572
Member since: Apr 2009

No mistake about it. Things could over-shoot on the down side. But real estate prices are also driven by the employment picture and REO inventory and not every part of the country has the same overhangs..

Real Estate will come back.... in some areas sooner than others.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by w67thstreet
over 14 years ago
Posts: 9003
Member since: Dec 2008

Fking laughing my azz off while peeing into riversider's cream cheese platter.

The easiest bubble ever to call, the easiest bubble ever to trade and make money off of....RIVERSIDER's ADVICE..." the sun'll come up tomorrow, bet your bottom dollar... .tomorrow...."

FK, you'll cash your last social security chk long before you'll see your coop ever hit the highs of 2006/2007. Thatz a w67 guarantee...

Some other noteworthy w67 guarantes
This was the greatest nyc re bubble of ALL time.
Sell NOW and rent = 2008/09/10' call
Double bottom... no doubt.....

And finally, don't forget... I said we'd see a double bottom then the thong comes off.... watch out below, the spincter is opening and it looks like a big one.... $500ps

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Riversider
over 14 years ago
Posts: 13572
Member since: Apr 2009

It took brains to call and act on the real estate bubble in 2005/2006/2007.
In 2011 it's thinking with a rear view mirror and following the herd.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by columbiacounty
over 14 years ago
Posts: 12708
Member since: Jan 2009

but...

how do you feel about his pissing in your cream cheese?

yummy?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by aboutready
over 14 years ago
Posts: 16354
Member since: Oct 2007

http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2011/05/even-more-negative-sentiment-for.html

"As I've noted before, I've been looking for a change in sentiment for homeowership. A shift in sentiment doesn't mean housing prices have bottomed - it just means the market is getting closer. In previous busts it seemed like negative sentiment lasted for a few years."

RS, really, even after attitudes turn positive prices may very well continue to fall. put the pom poms back in the closet. it's not time yet. but you look fetching in that cheerleading skirt.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by matsonjones
over 14 years ago
Posts: 1183
Member since: Feb 2007

So - question - how does this affect -

1.) The super prime Manhattan $ 5,000,000++ market.

2.) The general Manhattan (south of 110th) $ 2,000,000 and under market.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by lucillebluth
over 14 years ago
Posts: 2631
Member since: May 2010

is it me or did Douglas C. Yearley Jr., chief executive of Toll Brothers, a company with interests across the country including new york, being quoted in the new york times, just tell us how he really feels?

“Most people still want the big house with the big lot in the desirable school district in the suburbs. No one ever renovated the kitchen or redid a room for the kids in a rental,” Mr. Yearley said. “I think — I hope — we’ll be O.K.”

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by maly
over 14 years ago
Posts: 1377
Member since: Jan 2009

We'll have to wait for the next Streeteasy Condo index, and the next Miller-Samuel report. We can only look backward, and it seems to me Manhattan is continuing along the path of stable prices/low volume, with a restored seasonality for the past 18 months.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by lucillebluth
over 14 years ago
Posts: 2631
Member since: May 2010

"In a recent paper, a senior economist at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City found that the notion that homeownership builds more wealth than investing was true only about half the time.

“For many households in many years, renting and investing the saved cash flow has built more wealth than homeownership,” the economist, Jordan Rappaport, concluded. "

stand up and take a bow those who deserve it, it's in the times! you're legit!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by secondandc
over 14 years ago
Posts: 121
Member since: Mar 2008

time for another thousand post flame war....

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by huntersburg
over 14 years ago
Posts: 11329
Member since: Nov 2010

>columbiacounty
about 3 hours ago
ignore this person
report abuse but...
how do you feel about his pissing in your cream cheese?
yummy?

http://streeteasy.com/nyc/talk/discussion/23611-columbiacounty-gave-up-eating-shit-years-ago

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by huntersburg
over 14 years ago
Posts: 11329
Member since: Nov 2010

>but you look fetching in that cheerleading skirt.

eww, now we know a little too much about aboutready's fetishes

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by alanhart
over 14 years ago
Posts: 12397
Member since: Feb 2007

It took brains to call and act on the tulip bubble in 1635/1636/1637.
In 1641 it's thinking with a rear view mirror and following the herd.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by inonada
over 14 years ago
Posts: 7952
Member since: Oct 2008

Tulips will come back.... in some areas sooner than others.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by apt23
over 14 years ago
Posts: 2041
Member since: Jul 2009

Ino: Ha!

I'm wondering what effect the meltdown in Europe will have on RE. There are plenty of important economists that say if Greece defaults, it will be worse that Lehman Bros collapse vis a vis the credit market. That's why the ECB is pissing itself trying to get this settled--they are willing to sell everything in Greece that isn't tied down -- post offices, islands, statues. In case of default, The ECB will have serious problems considering how much debt they hold. That is why ECB member Lorenzo Schmagi was quoted as saying there is no orderly way for Greece to default. It will be akin to the death penalty. I'd say those words are rather alarmist. I have read at least 40 articles from reliable sources this weekend -- they all contradict each other . Buckle your seat belts, as they say.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by inonada
over 14 years ago
Posts: 7952
Member since: Oct 2008

It'll probably have a bigger effect on European RE. From what I can tell London and Paris and whatnot are just as big a shell game as NY. All just waiting for an excuse.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Riversider
over 14 years ago
Posts: 13572
Member since: Apr 2009

The NAR (I can't believe I'm quoting them) expects rents to increase by over 3% this year and more than 4% next year. The rental increases just make the BUY vs RENT debate tilt more toward rent.

The crisis in Europe at the margin just makes investing in the United States just that much more attractive. Regardless of our economic prospects we are seen as the safest place to invest in the world. Chinese, Russians etc, invest here because they know that our government unlike theirs does not randomly usurp property. Europeans with money see our budget deficit issues as minor compared to the issues affecting the euro.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by stevejhx
over 14 years ago
Posts: 12656
Member since: Feb 2008

"It took brains to call and act on the real estate bubble in 2005/2006/2007."

Thank you, RS - that's the nicest thing you've ever said to me.

You're now looking at a massive commodities / stocks / financial asset bubble that is soon to correct, and it will not be pretty. The same policies that caused the dot.com bubble, the real-estate bubble, the Lehman collapse, are being employed today to "revive" the economy. Unfortunately, all the data show that it is having the exact opposite effect.

At this point it is a pyramid scheme, and when the money is withdrawn the effect will be devastating.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by inonada
over 14 years ago
Posts: 7952
Member since: Oct 2008

RS, remind us, when/what did you buy?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Riversider
over 14 years ago
Posts: 13572
Member since: Apr 2009

Over a decade ago..the last time. That's as specific as I'll be.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by sidelinesitter
over 14 years ago
Posts: 1596
Member since: Mar 2009

"It is official, the new bottom is here."

Sorry to nitpick, but I have to quibble with one word here. The article predicts a new LOW, not a new BOTTOM. When the market is described as being locked in a downward spiral, it's optimistic to conclude that a bottom has been reached.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by stevejhx
over 14 years ago
Posts: 12656
Member since: Feb 2008

And the Chicago PMI skids, and housing has entered into a double-dip (and continues to fall), and stocks and commodities nonetheless surge.

The only intelligent analysis I have read:

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/rip-reaganomics-revolution-1981-2011-2011-05-31

We are setting ourselves up for the hugest crash ever. Stocks DO NOT go up 30% when the economy is slowing down and stopping. QEII is foolhardy economics.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by sjtmd
over 14 years ago
Posts: 670
Member since: May 2009

sideline - you are correct - should have said "new low is here" - maybe it is a bottom fixation. But as the DJ says when the kids are playing limbo "how low can you go?"

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by falcogold1
over 14 years ago
Posts: 4159
Member since: Sep 2008

This really has been one crazy long government assisted bubble. Crazy low rates and 8k tax credits are just last gasps to mantain bubble inflation. It's like that floater you take with you on vacation...started losing air on the third day and will not be coming home. It's a slow leak that no patch will fix. The only thing that will screw the re buying party is inflation of everything else.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by inonada
over 14 years ago
Posts: 7952
Member since: Oct 2008

Thanks, RS. Has there ever been a time when you were bearish on RE?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by stevejhx
over 14 years ago
Posts: 12656
Member since: Feb 2008

Falco, there is no inflation because the Fed doesn't count it anymore.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Wbottom
over 14 years ago
Posts: 2142
Member since: May 2010

see financial page of 5/30 ny'er--the "Billion Prices Project"--a great idea--unfortunately the MIT site that displayed the index info has been taken down, sparking all sorts of commentary re government interference--the MIT data confirmed that US inflation is grossly understated

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by w67thstreet
over 14 years ago
Posts: 9003
Member since: Dec 2008

2000. Flmaoz. No wonder riversider is a perma bull poster child for nyc re. He bought pre 9-11., got scared shitless when terrorist attack came, somehow by sheer stupidity did not sell.

Every year he did not sell, got handsomely rewarded by 'buy now or be priced out forever' while he coasted for his union job retirement to kick in.

So he can honestly say 'housesitting is not just a hobby, it's a career!' Flmaoz.

Fktards like riversider are selfish old fks, whose only question in life is 'did I get mine bf the bubble took off.'. I bet riversider bgt tulips early too. What'd happened if Gore didn't invent the Internet? Riversider could be mouthing off the his alzheimer roomie all day long.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by somewhereelse
over 14 years ago
Posts: 7435
Member since: Oct 2009

"and it seems to me Manhattan is continuing along the path of stable prices/low "

stable at 20% off peak is supposed to be a good thing?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Riversider
over 14 years ago
Posts: 13572
Member since: Apr 2009

Thanks, RS. Has there ever been a time when you were bearish on RE?

---
Yes Very much so. Beginning around 2004.
It started after I saw lines of people camping outside of Developers sales office hoping to buy first round.
The other reasons spring from that awareness.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by inonada
over 14 years ago
Posts: 7952
Member since: Oct 2008

RS, so why didn't you sell in 2005-2008? By 2004, you were already up 30-40% or so and you had identified a bubble. By 2007/2008, you'd have been up 100%, another 40-50% beyond when you saw bubbly prices. Right now we're 10-20% higher than 2004 prices when you saw a bubble. Why aren't you selling now? What do you think of the people who poke at AR for selling in 2004/2005? Didn't she have brains for calling and acting on the bubble?

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment