Skip Navigation

13th floor

Started by dmf13
about 15 years ago
Posts: 150
Member since: Feb 2008
Discussion about
Just saw a listing for 5 rsd that seemed nice, but I was curious about any negativity because of the floor number--so many buildings skip from 12-14. Other comments on apartment or building also welsome.
Response by truthskr10
about 15 years ago
Posts: 4088
Member since: Jul 2009

it's silly and in reality in those buildings, 14a is on the 13th floor.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc_sport
about 15 years ago
Posts: 820
Member since: Jan 2009

But if you sxip the 13th floor, you can charge an extra $50K for the higher floor, no?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by falcogold1
about 15 years ago
Posts: 4159
Member since: Sep 2008

what did you think of the apartment at 5RSD?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by bramstar
about 15 years ago
Posts: 1909
Member since: May 2008

The whole 13th floor thing is so funny--remember, that in many apartment buildings the '12th' floor is actually the 13th story, so if you live on 12, you actually live on 13...

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by bramstar
about 15 years ago
Posts: 1909
Member since: May 2008

Oh, and for what it's worth, I currently live in a building with the street address 666 and it's never bothered me, though some friends get a bit weirded out. Interestingly, though, they skip '13' here as well... guess they didn't want to risk a superstition double-whammy :-D

By the way, dmf, 5 RSD 13C looks like a really pretty apartment and it's great that you can use the foyer as a dining area.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by falcogold1
about 15 years ago
Posts: 4159
Member since: Sep 2008

I have a birth mark just under the hairline........6....6....5!
so close yet....so far.
Anyone know anything about this building or apartment?
I haven't visited but the pics and floor plan are very interesting.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by dmf13
about 15 years ago
Posts: 150
Member since: Feb 2008

I'm not superstitious at all just interested in genesis of numbering-bet it has some religious roots like I think 666 has. I though the apt had great views.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by gaongaon
about 15 years ago
Posts: 282
Member since: Feb 2009

In the relatively recent past, I have had several broker types tell me that this is the board of all boards. But, who knows, and a couple of years have passed. Nice apt. I guess the board should be the seller's worry, not the buyer's? I'm sure they're all very decent folks defending their investment, and why shouldn't they? I'm going the condo route, but best wishes, really nice apt, if a bit rich.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10023
about 15 years ago
Posts: 7614
Member since: Nov 2008

The A line, IMO is far superior to C at 5RSD. Esp. if they are converging to close to same price point.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
about 15 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

A few years ago the shareholders were assessed to defend and settle a suit against the building, but all back to normal now.

Only problem with 13C is, only the LR windows have been replaced. I generally like steel casements, but especially on RSD you pay for those aesthetics with noise and cold, so good solid double-paned tilt/turn would be better.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
about 15 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

A buyer'd better move fast on new windows. 5RSD will be landmarked soon (http://westendpreservation.org/WestEndCollegiateExtension.pdf) and it'll be much more of a hassle to do.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by bramstar
about 15 years ago
Posts: 1909
Member since: May 2008

All the landmarking means is that the windows will have to resemble the original ones. It does not mean the windows cannot be replaced.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
about 15 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

Of course not. As I said, it makes it more of a hassle, more expensive, etc. Though at this point 5RSD is such a hodge-podge of different windows, the whole thing would have to be done over to make it consistent.

I hope the extension goes through, as it'll further protect my slice of river view.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
about 15 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

On second thought, I take back the hassle part. The co-op pays to develop a window plan and get it approved by the LPC. After that, all the decision-making by individual owners is a cinch; they just decide on interior color and hardware. Any money difference wouldn't matter either way to anyone buying in 5RSD.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10023
about 15 years ago
Posts: 7614
Member since: Nov 2008

The extension is a done deal. I've been to most of the meetings. No organized community opposition, just random ppl grumbling about more regulations.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
about 15 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

Good. What's odd is the exclusion of the Ansonia. Is that maybe already landmarked on its own?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10023
about 15 years ago
Posts: 7614
Member since: Nov 2008

Yup.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by alanhart
about 15 years ago
Posts: 12397
Member since: Feb 2007

I miss the good old days, when Landmarks refused to bestow their status on any part of the UWS greater than a row of 5 buildings or so, on the premise that the UWS has "no cohesive architectural style" ... meaning basically that it's a gaudy hodgepodge of Gilded Era middle-class aspirational gewgaws. The highly-restrained Ansonia notwithstanding.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10023
about 15 years ago
Posts: 7614
Member since: Nov 2008

They're hanging their hat on "sense of place". One the sidestreets, there is little arch. - builders/speculators were building clumps of houses on the land they were able to purchase. As it became more profitable to build higher buildings, groups of rowhouses or older apt buildings were torn down willy-nilly to do so. Some of the original buildings lasted 20 or 30 years.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10023
about 15 years ago
Posts: 7614
Member since: Nov 2008

Excuse the typos - there is little architectural cohesion on the sidestreets.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by alanhart
about 15 years ago
Posts: 12397
Member since: Feb 2007

Can't "eclectic" be cohesive?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc10023
about 15 years ago
Posts: 7614
Member since: Nov 2008

I'm no architectural critic, but I understand "eclectic" to mean something like the 80th St. townhouses between Columbus & Ams or the south side of 73rd St. The houses are quite different but they relate to each other. Most rows don't have that because of those early speculator-builders. Or a nice row is rudely interrupted by those ubiquitous H-plan small apt buildings.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by lucillebluth
about 15 years ago
Posts: 2631
Member since: May 2010

"meaning basically that it's a gaudy hodgepodge of Gilded Era middle-class aspirational gewgaws."

hot tramp, i love you so

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by huntersburg
about 15 years ago
Posts: 11329
Member since: Nov 2010

The 13th floor is where they put the misfits. Usually the apartments there have some flaw in them, like a window in the shower.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment

Most popular

  1. 5 Comments
  2. 37 Comments