Skip Navigation

Gov't considers turning foreclosures into rentals

Started by lucillebluth
over 14 years ago
Posts: 2631
Member since: May 2010
Discussion about
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_GOVERNMENT_HOME_RENTALS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2011-08-10-13-18-31 "The Federal Housing Finance Agency said Wednesday it is seeking input from investors on how to rent homes owned by government-controlled mortgage companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the Federal Housing Administration." would you take this as an... [more]
Response by lucillebluth
over 14 years ago
Posts: 2631
Member since: May 2010

and what does this mean for individual as well as corporate landlords in the areas in the vicinity of, i guess, clusters of these govmnt owned rental properties?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by lucillebluth
over 14 years ago
Posts: 2631
Member since: May 2010

just that some people had been saying that rental properties are where it's at. wondering what they think about this. seriously wondering, not like tricking you into an argument. because i, too, thought it sounded like a good idea. i guess the obvious answer is to avoid buying rentals in hard hit areas where there are already a lot of foreclosures and could reasonably be foreseen to be more? but that's where the bargains are, hence my query.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Riversider
over 14 years ago
Posts: 13573
Member since: Apr 2009

Smart idea. If we had more smart ideas like that I might actually believe in gov't

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by lucillebluth
over 14 years ago
Posts: 2631
Member since: May 2010

but don't you think it pretty much removes the possibility of free market rent in those areas? for private landlords, i mean.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by lucillebluth
over 14 years ago
Posts: 2631
Member since: May 2010

i say this because these a homes not designed and built like government housing. outside of new york, people who can avoid government assisted housing developemts like the plague, because they are just awful and depressing to live in. if "regular" houses and condos became goverment property private landlords would have to compete with them. outside of new york metro area. is that not a legitimate conclusion?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by lucillebluth
over 14 years ago
Posts: 2631
Member since: May 2010

and from the perspective of addressing our national housing needs, stabilizing housing costs, this kind of influence is probably a good thing - for people in need of housing. but should probably become a factor in the profit motive for aspiring landlords in those areas. i think. fwiw, and oversharing here, but i lost a sh*tload of money the first time around in rental properties in florida because i wasn't paying attention and as an adult i should have been. no one to blame but lucille for passing out at the wheel. there's a reason alex became a bluth. since then, have done relatively ok, will be first to admit often thanks to the great advice and ideas here. but this just seems like a real possible problem.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by lucillebluth
over 14 years ago
Posts: 2631
Member since: May 2010

on the other hand, it could act to keep rents artificially inflated to prices that a broke nation can't bear without government assistance. and actually, the government being a landlord, could give that lobby much more influence than already exists. hhmmm. things to ponder.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by lucillebluth
over 14 years ago
Posts: 2631
Member since: May 2010

and since you can't really deny that so many profitable entities today are only able to make that profit because the government is on their side, it does make sense to be on the same side as the government. but how to know if you'll be on the same team or competition? hhhmmmmmm

you guys are useless. i'll go bother someone smart in real life.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment