Uconstitutional!

eh. wtf else am i supposed to do. it's my weekend with the kids and they're asleep. how are you?

the divorce is finalized?

nope

so how have you already set up visitation?

we worked it out. divorce is only as ugly as the 2 people involved choose to make it.

of course.

but you're as ugly as they come.

so you admit to having seen me, stalker?

of course not.

but you make my point.

stalking liar. you have no point.

you win...cuntersburg.

omg lol. we don't even look alike! i guess we can sound similar. but he's a dude, you know, and i am not one. not since the operation.

you see lucille? you are such a horrible piece of queef trash that even someone as stupid as columbiacunty has picked it up.

hilarious.

who's up next?

jim_hones10
about 15 hours ago
ignore this person
report abuse lucillebluth
about 2 weeks ago
ignore this person
report abuse As far as Brooklyn, it's still on my list but I have to resolve some other things first. Jim, not that I'm not flattered by your concern and devotion to the particulars of my life, but i have to put it out there that mrs. Hones cannot possibly be comfortable with it. Maybe less time following me around the Internet? Btw, Project Isolation is underway. Let me know when you start to notice something. Bye bye Jim.

by the way, lucille, i still dont know notice anything. has project isolation started?

why don't you make tonight tonight lucille? let everyone know.

columbiacounty
2 minutes ago
ignore this person
report abuse hilarious.

who's up next?

what the fuck are you talking about stupid?

hey, where is west67? i guess you can't type fast enough to be two people at the same time huh?

no one comes as fast as you do.

i guess your wife must have both told you about my little issue huh cunty?

you can't win this because you are just too stupid.

are you kidding?

this is the best you can do?

Hello everyone.

That isn't what your wife said. You should pay more attention to her.

you spoke to someone's wife? when? what was said? who?

jimbo, you're an adulterer? well. think you know someone.

Back to move important things. Jim, are you concerned that posts made by caonima/Brooks2 were deleted after you agreed with them? When did you and Brooks2/caonima get onto the same team?

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504564_162-57408827-504564/appeals-court-fires-back-at-obamas-comments-on-health-care-case/

CBS News) In the escalating battle between the administration and the judiciary, a federal appeals court apparently is calling the president's bluff -- ordering the Justice Department to answer by Thursday whether the Obama Administration believes that the courts have the right to strike down a federal law, according to a lawyer who was in the courtroom.

The order, by a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, appears to be in direct response to the president's comments yesterday about the Supreme Court's review of the health care law. Mr. Obama all but threw down the gauntlet with the justices, saying he was "confident" the Court would not "take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress."

Obama vs. Marbury v. Madison
The President needs a remedial course in judicial review.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304023504577320013259347408.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_AboveLEFTTop#articleTabs%3Dcomments

hilarious comments:

"Forget about the birth certificate, I want to see his diploma! There can't be any chance he's a Constitutional Law professor."

"This proves it; The University of Chicago owes anyone who studied constitutional law under him an apology and a refund."

What a shock. A US President complaining about judicial activism. Every President does it. This is from Reagan:

"Reagan claimed during a presidential debate in Cleveland that he opposed the Equal Rights Amendment, despite being %u201Cfor equal rights,%u201D because %u201Cthe amendment will take this problem out of the hands of elected legislators and put it in the hands of unelected judges.%u201D

Reagan insisted that %u201C[w]e%u2019ve had too many examples in recent years of courts and judges legislating. They%u2019re not interpreting what the law says and whether someone was violated or not. In too many instances they have been actually legislating by legal decree what they think the law should be.%u201D"

And this is from the 1996 Republican Party platform:

"The federal judiciary, including the U.S. Supreme Court, has overstepped its authority under the Constitution. It has usurped the right of citizen legislators and popularly elected executives to make law by declaring duly enacted laws to be %u201Cunconstitutional%u201D through the misapplication of the principle of judicial review."

So this is just yet another example of the conservative media Mafia blowing things out of proportion.

Sorry, don't know what happened to the quotes. Here's the link:

http://www.ohiomm.com/blogs/blog_mass_destruction/2012/04/05/bruising-judicial-fee-fees/ID=17794/

The Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937[1] (frequently called the "court-packing plan")[2] was a legislative initiative proposed by U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt to add more justices to the U.S. Supreme Court. Roosevelt's purpose was to obtain favorable rulings regarding New Deal legislation that had been previously ruled unconstitutional.[3] The central and most controversial provision of the bill would have granted the President power to appoint an additional Justice to the U.S. Supreme Court, up to a maximum of six, for every sitting member over the age of 70 years and 6 months.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_Procedures_Reform_Bill_of_1937

And your point is? President Obama has never suggested anything of the kind. If you are trying to say that all sitting presidents try to threaten, cajole and persuade the SCT, then you have stated the obvious.