Skip Navigation
StreetEasy Logo

What's the ugliest building you've ever seen?

Started by realestate19
about 14 years ago
Posts: 114
Member since: Jan 2011
It is absolutely the ugliest building I have ever seen. What's yours? (Exterior wise). Thanks!
Response by stevejhx
about 14 years ago
Posts: 12656
Member since: Feb 2008

Long Island City.

I know it's not a building - it's a concept, but bear with....

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by stevejhx
about 14 years ago
Posts: 12656
Member since: Feb 2008

"Experience an unmatched abundance of neighborhood shopping"

On West 94th Street? Really?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by fhsack
about 14 years ago
Posts: 129
Member since: Jan 2009

Anything in white brick

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by hol4
about 14 years ago
Posts: 710
Member since: Nov 2008

am i the only one who loves white brick? especially aged, and intentionally crackling if interior.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by stevejhx
about 14 years ago
Posts: 12656
Member since: Feb 2008

Probably.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by hol4
about 14 years ago
Posts: 710
Member since: Nov 2008

sighh.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Fairway
about 14 years ago
Posts: 156
Member since: Feb 2011

The ugliest building in the UWS in my opinion is Hudson Park at 323 W 96 St. It has no excuse because it was built only about 5-6 years ago. 100 W 94 is old and looks like other common ugly buildings of its era.

In the city, or at least Manhattan, the Westin Hotel Times Square is my candidate for ugliest.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Fairway
about 14 years ago
Posts: 156
Member since: Feb 2011

I don't hate white brick.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Riversider
about 14 years ago
Posts: 13572
Member since: Apr 2009
Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by mutombonyc
about 14 years ago
Posts: 2468
Member since: Dec 2008
Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by huntersburg
about 14 years ago
Posts: 11329
Member since: Nov 2010

White brick is fine, but the similar type of building done in beige are worse, especially when they have balconies with beige translucent glass.

Additionally, buildings with an all concrete facade. Gateway Plaza comes to mind, as does Tower 67.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by huntersburg
about 14 years ago
Posts: 11329
Member since: Nov 2010

The balconies at 40 East 9th Street are an example of the first type of building.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by huntersburg
about 14 years ago
Posts: 11329
Member since: Nov 2010

And which was the building that had windows in the shower that columbiacounty visited? Aweful.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by falcogold1
about 14 years ago
Posts: 4159
Member since: Sep 2008

it would be in Astoria. The absolut ugliest part of the city.

What we say about Astoria: "It's like the ugly girl that can cook"!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by huntersburg
about 14 years ago
Posts: 11329
Member since: Nov 2010

>What we say about Astoria

Who is 'we'?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by falcogold1
about 14 years ago
Posts: 4159
Member since: Sep 2008

This is the ugliest building in the city:
http://streeteasy.com/nyc/building/the-future-condominium
It's so ugly, I would not buy a property that have even a partial view of this heaping eyesore.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by falcogold1
about 14 years ago
Posts: 4159
Member since: Sep 2008

Riversider....
don't like the building or the competition?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by falcogold1
about 14 years ago
Posts: 4159
Member since: Sep 2008

WE is people from Astoria

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by huntersburg
about 14 years ago
Posts: 11329
Member since: Nov 2010

Oh, ok, very good.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by huntersburg
about 14 years ago
Posts: 11329
Member since: Nov 2010

>This is the ugliest building in the city:
http://streeteasy.com/nyc/building/the-future-condominium
It's so ugly, I would not buy a property that have even a partial view of this heaping eyesore.

So the question is falcogold1, would you rather live in an ugly building, or live in a nice building with a direct view of an ugly building?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by bramstar
about 14 years ago
Posts: 1909
Member since: May 2008

http://www.frogview.com/show8.php?file=14179

Not NYC but couldn't resist...

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by stevejhx
about 14 years ago
Posts: 12656
Member since: Feb 2008

The one in Barcelona looks like it's powered by 2 D-cell batteries.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by e76
about 14 years ago
Posts: 226
Member since: May 2009
Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by stevejhx
about 14 years ago
Posts: 12656
Member since: Feb 2008

But e, there's SUBZERO REFRIGERATORS!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by e76
about 14 years ago
Posts: 226
Member since: May 2009

Those are nice.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NYRENewbie
about 14 years ago
Posts: 591
Member since: Mar 2008

Bramstar, those are great!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Fairway
about 14 years ago
Posts: 156
Member since: Feb 2011

That's New Jersey ugly

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc212
about 14 years ago
Posts: 484
Member since: Jul 2008

>This is the ugliest building in the city:
>http://streeteasy.com/nyc/building/the-future-condominium
>It's so ugly, I would not buy a property that have even a partial view of this heaping eyesore.

I am a bit surprised. I thought this was actually one of the better looking bldgs. in Murray Hill... Maybe it doesn't photograph well, but it actually looks cool in person, in my opinion. At least, it doesn't look like those gray square bldgs. from the 1960s through the 80s and its circa-1990s/2000s brown-square counterparts you see so much in that area... I personally like the art deco-ish 1990s architecture that stands out in the otherwise boring neighborhood!!!

Besides, after seeing "William Beaver" or the "L Haus" with what appear to be exposed insulation materials, nothing else seems ugly...
http://streeteasy.com/nyc/building/william-beaver-house
http://streeteasy.com/nyc/building/the-l-haus

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Isle_of_Lucy
about 14 years ago
Posts: 342
Member since: Apr 2011

May we expand beyond apartment buildings? If so, 232 East Broadway. It was the mock location of the New Zealand Consulate on Flight of the Conchords.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Bill7284
about 14 years ago
Posts: 631
Member since: Feb 2009
Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by JuiceMan
about 14 years ago
Posts: 3578
Member since: Aug 2007

The Ellington

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by jjharned
about 14 years ago
Posts: 15
Member since: Oct 2009

All of Lincoln Towers. Without question. Reminds me of the projects outside of Moscow. Dreary and soul-crushing in scale.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by jjharned
about 14 years ago
Posts: 15
Member since: Oct 2009

Most of Chump Place looks like it belongs in Dallas. Zero character. Collectively Fail.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by jjharned
about 14 years ago
Posts: 15
Member since: Oct 2009

Sorry. Trump Place.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by jjharned
about 14 years ago
Posts: 15
Member since: Oct 2009

Notice how on every listing of Lincoln Towers they never show an exterior shot of the building?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Bill7284
about 14 years ago
Posts: 631
Member since: Feb 2009

When my friends and I used to cut through Lincoln Towers go to WEA, we used to always agree that it looked like we were in Chicago.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by hol4
about 14 years ago
Posts: 710
Member since: Nov 2008

i would add gehry on westside highway... too shtick for me..

i'd take trump intl tower over this sans gold

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by hol4
about 14 years ago
Posts: 710
Member since: Nov 2008

gehry

http://www.lindsayrgwatt.com/archives/old_blog/17_New_Buildings_in_the_Hood_files/IMG_4260.jpg

tho i welcome him w open arms to this city, as the fedora hipsters who rent my units love him

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Sensei
about 14 years ago
Posts: 2
Member since: Oct 2010

Surprised this wasn't mentioned earlier.

William Beaver House is a total disaster.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by APCBPLNRIG
about 14 years ago
Posts: 1
Member since: Jan 2011

The AT&T building in Tribeca
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/33_Thomas_Street

no windows... scary

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by cityrat
about 14 years ago
Posts: 15
Member since: Jul 2011

Avalon Chrystie Place looks like the Queen Mary docked on Houston Street. The Edge looks like half the Royal Caribbean fleet docked on 7th street in Williamsurg. And not in a good way.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by kfsee
about 14 years ago
Posts: 6
Member since: May 2010

the ugliest building at night to me is 375 pearl, the verizon building, because of its ugly red sign. from brooklyn it's an eyesore next to the brooklyn bridge.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NYCMatt
about 14 years ago
Posts: 7523
Member since: May 2009

Just about every structure in Williamsburg.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NYCMatt
about 14 years ago
Posts: 7523
Member since: May 2009

KFsee, remember when your favorite building simply had the "bell" symbol on it? I'm not one for "branding" buildings with Times Square-style marquees, but at least that looked somewhat classy.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by kfsee
about 14 years ago
Posts: 6
Member since: May 2010

Right, the bell. Maybe some logos get grandfathered into our aesthetic tastes. I remember actually liking the Pan Am logo as a kid (and the MetLife logo doesn't bother me now). But a handful of marquees over the years have struck me as insensitive to the surroundings. Looking south from midtown, the giant Travelers umbrella in Tribeca was also a bummer. Maybe it's like porn -- you know it when you see it.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by falcogold1
about 14 years ago
Posts: 4159
Member since: Sep 2008

nyc212,
it's the terrace. It offends my eye in some outstanding way. From the second it went up it was a sign of more uglies to come. The picture is not so bad. You must view with your own eye to feel the full mental reflux it causes.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by skippy2222
about 14 years ago
Posts: 202
Member since: Jun 2008

the blue brick apt building on the UES. I think that they did reclad it though recently. Truly it was heinous, and the very worst of post war design choices. I'm also not one to hate the post war white brick/red brick buildings. I think that they served a purpose and even now many of them have floorplans which work to this day.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by huntersburg
about 14 years ago
Posts: 11329
Member since: Nov 2010

>The AT&T building in Tribeca

Another real gem, in that area, but with windows that in this case make it ugly, is the Javitz federal building - you see it when you drive down Broadway.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by sjtmd
about 14 years ago
Posts: 670
Member since: May 2009

Easy, Schwab House, UWS. Ugly and massive. At least the elevator operators wear nice uniforms.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by realestate19
about 14 years ago
Posts: 114
Member since: Jan 2011

301 east 62 is a close second for me. The apartments are decent, but I hate the exterior!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by trdimentional
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 1
Member since: Jun 2010

i was reading at the comments is that building that ugly?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by realestate19
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 114
Member since: Jan 2011

trdi- which building? 301 east 62? It looks like public housing. So does Schwab House.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Riversider
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 13572
Member since: Apr 2009
Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by falcogold1
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 4159
Member since: Sep 2008

Riversider, you do realize that that building vibrates at 5 different speeds in 5 different modes.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment