Skip Navigation
StreetEasy Logo

Broker Fees

Started by JButton
about 14 years ago
Posts: 447
Member since: Sep 2011
Discussion about
Hypothetical question at this point (probably real in next year or 2) - I need to move within NYC, selling $2.5-3mm place and buying a similarly priced apt right after. If I committed to working with one broker in both transactions, what are the chances or paying lower commission on sale side (say 4.5% vs 6%). Idea would be the broker would make 4.5% in total for both transactions. I guess the question centers on how much goes to the broker vs. the house, if the house would accept a deal (so not all shouldered by the broker) and if a broker is willing to deal without house, would they be allowed? What are your thoughts/experiences? thanks JB
Response by gcondo
about 14 years ago
Posts: 1111
Member since: Feb 2009

wow someone is going to make alot of money from you for doing nothing

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by ClintonBuyer
about 14 years ago
Posts: 82
Member since: Aug 2011

I've done this "dual transaction" before. My broker was totally willing to negotiate the seller-side fees, especially if it wan't cobroke (because the cobroker's 3% wasn't under his control).

In fact, when I told him that I was going to reject a somewhat mediocre offer from a buyer working w/ a buyer's agent (i.e., cobroke), my agent lowered his fee from 5.5% (already discounted from 6% in the contract) to 4.5%, to make the offer more attractive. I think it was all perfectly legal.

I might be mistaken, but I think I've heard someone say that discounting RE fees wasn't allowed in NJ...

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by ab_11218
about 14 years ago
Posts: 2017
Member since: May 2009

all % are negotiable, especially with the numbers that you're throwing around. i would sign with 4% no cobroke and 5% with. i think you'll find plenty of takers.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by front_porch
about 14 years ago
Posts: 5316
Member since: Mar 2008

Before I was a real estate agent, I asked for (and received) a dual-transaction discount from the firm I now work for (a Chelsea-based boutique).

This kind of discounting does have to be run up the flagpole, and in larger firms, that's a longer process.

Still, it's hard to imagine -- especially in this market, where volume is still down off-peak -- that you couldn't get it from any firm you chose.

Certainly we're happy to take a look at the property if you'd like to talk more.

ali r.
DG Neary Realty
ali [at] dgneary [dot] com

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by bashmore
about 14 years ago
Posts: 8
Member since: Nov 2007

To the OP, first of all, if you're by any chance a F1 fan, that's a great name this year (only second to svettel)!

As an independent broker, I'm always open to dealing in any way which is:
(1) Legal
(2) Creates a situation where we have happy campers in every corner - buyer(s)/seller(s)/broker(s).

Always happy to talk anytime.

I think most of us have cut commissions to suit circumstances and make deals at various times.
The independent broker generally has the advantage of not having to refer to managers/owners but can make instantaneous decisions.
One limiting factor on the sale side is that, in order to be sufficiently attractive for other brokers to show unit, a co-broke % of 5% is probably as low as you want to go (unless it's a very high-value unit).
I did once co-broke a unit at 4% (as my seller insisted on going with 4% despite my advice otherwise and I personally was happy enough with the absolute amount of the commission as it was a $3 mi+ sale). However, the broker on the other side voiced more than a little displeasure but the deal still went through. But I did have one prominent broker who expressed that she would not be bringing one specific customer due to the level of commission.

Basil

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment