Open House Report: 160 Riverside Drive #1A
Started by West81st
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 5564
Member since: Jan 2008
Discussion about 160 Riverside Drive #1A
160 Riverside Drive #1A Co-op, seven into six - currently 2 beds 2 baths + den Asks $2,275,000; Maint. $2,861 Traffic: Light (I was there early) In most pre-war buildings, ground-floor apartments are stepchildren. While these units can be quite nice (especially when they enjoy enhanced ceiling height and tall windows), they seldom offer the flow of "classic" layouts. From this perspective, #1A at... [more]
160 Riverside Drive #1A Co-op, seven into six - currently 2 beds 2 baths + den Asks $2,275,000; Maint. $2,861 Traffic: Light (I was there early) In most pre-war buildings, ground-floor apartments are stepchildren. While these units can be quite nice (especially when they enjoy enhanced ceiling height and tall windows), they seldom offer the flow of "classic" layouts. From this perspective, #1A at 160 RSD is a pleasant surprise. The floor plan resembles a typical classic seven, converted to six rooms in the usual way: by sacrificing the maid's room to create a large eat-in kitchen. Although #1A is smaller than the rest of the "A" line, few major compromises are evident here. All the rooms are of good size, flow is fairly natural and it would be quite simple to restore the third bedroom, or even to add a fourth. Light is very good, by ground-floor standards, in four rooms. The front of the apartment even has a nice view across the upper level of Riverside Park, toward the Hudson. The rear bedroom looks up at the Rice Mansion. Overall, #1A is about as close as a maisonette can come to a "plus" view. #1A was handsomely renovated by a previous owner. (See http://tours.imagemaker360.com/Viewer/12.asp?ID=63336&tab=stills&SS=1 for the 2007 pictures that are no longer visible on Streeteasy.) The work appears to be aging graefully. The kitchen - particularly the massive Garland range - made me drool, despite weak natural light. A home office has been built into the den, mitigating the loss of the maid's room. As currently configured, the den could also serve as guest quarters, as it is separated from the living room by pocket doors. The current owners freshened the decor after their 2007 purchase. I don't think they added anything major - perhaps some storage, window treatments, lighting and the like. That raises the question of pricing. #1A came to market in early 2007 at $1.85MM, quickly sparked a bidding war and sold, after two weeks on the market, for $2MM. The apartment's merits - and weak on-market competition - may justify the $2.275MM ask on the new listing. On the other hand, a 14% markup on a 2007 purchase might be too much for informed buyers to swallow. [less]
Add Your Comment
Recommended for You
-
From our blog
NYC Open Houses for November 19 and 20 - More from our blog
Most popular
-
24 Comments
-
70 Comments
-
19 Comments
-
13 Comments
Recommended for You
-
From our blog
NYC Open Houses for November 19 and 20 - More from our blog
I've always been fond of the A-line at 160--gracious layout and the upper floors offer magnificent views. But the whole bars-on-every-window ground-floor situation could be a deal-breaker to many buyers. Unless someone comes along who just wants a 160 A-line without paying the higher-floor premium.
Bubble plus 14%. Flmaozzzz.
I gotta meet the Russian/Chinese/ Irish that buys this one. Never mind I'll jut look into the window as I walk by.
bramstar: Exactly, and I probably should have stressed that point. There's a small subset of the buyer pool that can tolerate the ground floor, and the sound of the #5 bus rumbling by.
I think #1A is an outstanding ground-floor apartment, but outstanding or not, it's still a ground-floor apartment. That's why it was priced the way it was in 2007. One could argue that it was drastically underpriced at the time, and that the sellers might have done even better if they had asked for more. The way I see it, a prior sale is a prior sale. Among the relatively few buyers who will even consider #1A, and for any appraiser who has to put a value on the apartment, that 2007 price could cast a pretty long shadow.
On the other hand, if you look at the most recent comparable sale (http://streeteasy.com/nyc/sale/618368-coop-333-central-park-west-upper-west-side-new-york), or at the low-floor C7 alternatives currently on the market, $2.275MM doesn't seem so unreasonable.
I thought I'd chime-in with one point about first-floor apartments: Upper West Side: Shomer Shabbos Buyers -- discuss!
Bramster and w81. Just two uwsiders making small talk while Making copies. Making copies.
Keep pumping. I really hope you tell your moms to keep the faith. They reall do 'deserve' to hold onto the $4mm peak c9 they bought for $28k in 1977. Sweet justice.....
The bubble god gives and takes..... Hahahahhahahaaaaaaaaaaa.
I enjoy reading the w81st open house reports.
I haven't been on w81st for years (or around the uws much.)
Used to rent an apt.at 60 RSD.in the 1980's.
Ron Wood lived down the block on W 78th. He sold his home to a politician.
There went the neighborhood.
wow.
Update: #1A closed on 07/18 for $2,120,000.