Skip Navigation
StreetEasy Logo

building at 212 East 47th Street

Started by jjeanx
over 13 years ago
Posts: 7
Member since: Nov 2006
Response by Truth
over 13 years ago
Posts: 5641
Member since: Dec 2009

That's how they roll, jjeanx:
Deny, refuse, accuse.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by ClintonBuyer
over 13 years ago
Posts: 82
Member since: Aug 2011

This is terrble.

Most owners there bought at the very height of the market between 2006 and 2007. As though that weren't bad enough... Oy.

It is not very nice of me to say this at this point, but the renovations they did there never seemed right to me... I can say the same about the Sheffield, too, but nothing really felt quite complete, well done, substantial or fresh. I was actually surprised to hear that it is an Extell bldg.!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by CoyWolf
over 11 years ago
Posts: 124
Member since: Jul 2007

Hi everyone,

Any updates on the above issue (toxic chemicals infesting the building)? Sounds like a nightmare?

Also, in a previous thread about the building, many people gave it a HUGE thumbs down: common areas are cheap and common charges are "really high"--but these postings were from 2 to 6 years ago…. Can a current/recent resident update us on these issues? It seems like the common charges have settled down a bit; they don't seem high at all right now, in 2014.

Thanks so much.

CoyWOlf

Has this issue of

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
over 11 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

Rosenhaus's suit against his apartment's owner and the condo is still going on, five years later.

Apparently whatever may have wrong has been fixed, as he keeps renewing his RS lease. For the term ending 6/30/2015, he's paying $1998 for his one-bedroom, #20C.

Besides his leases, there're lots of other interesting documents filed with the case. On eCourts, search for index 116263/2008.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
over 11 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

To clarify, the condo wasn't a defendant until this year. That's the fourth amended complaint. At some point eight other tenants joined Rosenhaus as plaintiffs, but they've all settled. Rosenhaus is back to being the only plaintiff, and the defendants are Extell, the sponsor LLC which owns the unsold apartments, all the contractors who worked on the facade/windows/HVAC, and the condo. And the managing agent, so virtually anybody having to do with the building.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment