Skip Navigation

"dogs on approval" -- what does it really mean?

Started by GraffitiGrammarian
over 13 years ago
Posts: 687
Member since: Jul 2008
Discussion about
If you were thinking of buying a co-op, and you knew you wanted to get a dog after you moved in, would you consider buying a co-op that takes "dogs on approval"? Curious about people's experiences with this. Clearly it means the board wants to restrict dogs in the building, but does it usually mean they just want to keep out large dogs, or certain breeds, like pit bulls? Or does it really mean that they don't want dogs at all, but they leave the door open to dog ownership in order to keep from hurting re-sale values? In other words, are they likely to be capricious with their approval, and tell you "no" no matter how agreeable the dog that you wish to get? thanks.
Response by bob420
over 13 years ago
Posts: 581
Member since: Apr 2009

Stop by the building from time to time and see if anyone is coming/going with a dog. I know in my building, you will see people coming and going all the time with dogs.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by lovetocook
over 13 years ago
Posts: 171
Member since: Sep 2010

When we were looking to buy a co op, our understanding was that in some buildings it meant they didn't want a dog beyond a certain weight, in other cases it was because they didn't want pit bulls, rotti, or other certain breeds. I believe it depends on the building. If the building didn't want any dogs, they would just say no dogs or no pets. I always asked the sales person if in doubt.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by GraffitiGrammarian
over 13 years ago
Posts: 687
Member since: Jul 2008

Thanks for comments.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NYCMatt
over 13 years ago
Posts: 7523
Member since: May 2009

Speaking as a co-op board president, I can tell you it means we want to allow dogs, but retain ultimate veto power. Pure and simple.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by West34
over 13 years ago
Posts: 1040
Member since: Mar 2009

so Matt treats "dogs" just like "buyers"

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Bill7284
over 13 years ago
Posts: 631
Member since: Feb 2009

I have asked around about this and the general concencus seems to be that they have no problem with dogs as long as they don't constantly bark or worse howl for the entire time the owner is gone. They don't want a dog with separation anxiety as that will drive everyone in the building to drink. If there was any other problem, then they seem to have a weight limit keeping out the large dogs who seem to be more calm and reserved than the small yappy canines. IMO.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by GraffitiGrammarian
over 13 years ago
Posts: 687
Member since: Jul 2008

So you guys are suggesting that the board might come and tell me I have to get rid of my dog, even if I'm several years into my dog-ownership? If the dog suddenly develops bad behavior at say, the age of 7 years, the board can insist I get rid of it?

Couldn't a board do that in any case, even if they didn't declare "dogs on approval" as a formal policy?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NYCMatt
over 13 years ago
Posts: 7523
Member since: May 2009

Yes, we can.

But we also want to control what dogs come into the building in the first place, to nip any potential problems in the bud.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment

Most popular

  1. 16 Comments