Skip Navigation

Thoughts on Debt Ceiling

Started by rraphael98
over 12 years ago
Posts: 34
Member since: Mar 2007
Discussion about
Thoughts on Debt Ceiling: A) They come to a deal at the last minute. B) Lehman style meltdown, (move to cash now) C) Something in between
Response by Ottawanyc
over 12 years ago
Posts: 842
Member since: Aug 2011

Probably (A) although I think there are a scary number of TPs that would take pride in shutting down government, so more of a possibility than it should be. But even if they get a last minute deal the market will start selling off well before that. For too many people it is simply not worth the risk of a 10-15% hit. So easy to just put your money on the side for a week or two and maybe miss the 3% bump when a settlement comes.

So I am half in cash, and heavily hedged (short DIA, SPY, calls on VIXY, GLD). I also set a bunch of stops last week which are getting picked off.

I find it weird that all year finance types have been calling for a correction and now that one seems likely or very possible they are saying it is a buying opportunity. Strange.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by caonima
over 12 years ago
Posts: 815
Member since: Apr 2010

u rednecks so simple so naive

there is no impact at all, the us gov will print much more junk money, and will also deadbeat

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Oxymoronic
over 12 years ago
Posts: 165
Member since: Dec 2007

Only stupidity of the highest order would result in an outcome of A). Of course, the posturing and hardlining associated with negotiations will continue. I understand that Boehner has already said that he would get a motion passed even with a minority of republicans to avoid going over the cliff. Let's face it, just like the banks, government debt is a confidence game.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by alanhart
over 12 years ago
Posts: 12397
Member since: Feb 2007

I like high ceilings.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by fieldschester
over 12 years ago
Posts: 3525
Member since: Jul 2013
Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by aboutready
over 12 years ago
Posts: 16354
Member since: Oct 2007

Thank you, rs, for yet another youtube.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by fieldschester
over 12 years ago
Posts: 3525
Member since: Jul 2013

That was me.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Triple_Zero
over 12 years ago
Posts: 516
Member since: Apr 2012

As someone whose savings is almost entirely in cash (mostly foreign but some USD), I would love to see a big 2009-style correction. I'm just wondering if the dollar will be pushed down further before a deal is reached.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Riversider
over 12 years ago
Posts: 13573
Member since: Apr 2009
Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by columbiacounty
over 12 years ago
Posts: 12708
Member since: Jan 2009

more stupid links.

anything that you can contribute?

of course not.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by fieldschester
over 12 years ago
Posts: 3525
Member since: Jul 2013

Dylan Ratigan, what a complainer, and not even on MSNBC.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by 9d8b7988045e4953a882
over 12 years ago
Posts: 236
Member since: May 2013

If you take Clinton-era spending levels and adjust for inflation and population growth, federal spending would be about $2.7 trillion. Federal tax receipts in 2012 were $2.45 trillion. Returning to adjusted adjusted Clinton-era spending levels would allow us to nearly balance the budget.

They need to cut spending and start paying off the $16.7 trillion debt. NOT borrow more.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by fieldschester
over 12 years ago
Posts: 3525
Member since: Jul 2013

Bill Clinton, the good* old days

*depends what the definition of "good" is

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by 9d8b7988045e4953a882
over 12 years ago
Posts: 236
Member since: May 2013

Clinton had leadership skills and was able to negotiate with both parties to deliver reasonable budgets. Yearly deficits were minimal by today's standards, and there were even surpluses a few years. See http://www.taxpolicycenter.org/taxfacts/displayafact.cfm?Docid=200

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by caonima
over 12 years ago
Posts: 815
Member since: Apr 2010

the biggest government branch -- military is still running, means they have more than enough money, no worries

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by truthskr10
over 12 years ago
Posts: 4088
Member since: Jul 2009

Reagan / Tip O'Neill.....A)
Clinton / Newt Gingrich ....A)
Even Bush / Pelosi.......A)

A no guile Boehner and a not negotiate anything in 5 years Obama......D) Pot luck

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by truthskr10
over 12 years ago
Posts: 4088
Member since: Jul 2009

Maybe Putin can give us a solution.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by yikes
over 12 years ago
Posts: 1016
Member since: Mar 2012

there a great videos and articles here, too:

www.google.com

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment