w67thstreet is an incoherent homeless troll

>> Both Nada and FP know my real identity, so I am not inclined to make anything up. You, on the other hand, do appear to be anonymous, plus you have previously admitted to making stuff up.

I actually know all 3 of youse's real identities, so none of you better be making things up. Big brother is watching.

>But this $15 trillion is paid for, and it's paid for out of GDP.

If you bought your house and it went up in value by $15 trillion or $15 thousand, and then back down, it didn't cost you any money, you didn't make any money, and no one else gained or lost, the economy didn't gain or lose because the value of your home went up and down or down and up.

> youse's

same as 67, "Fking English as a second language!"?

>> Nada - We are talking past each other. I wish aboutready would weigh in; I believe she is a prime example of someone whose investment in NYC real estate is a small portion of a rationally diversified portfolio (I don't know - maybe it represents her life savings but I seriously doubt that). W67th's tiresome point seems to be that a single family residence in NYC can not be an investment, and that is simply not true; maybe not the "best" investment, but it can be an investment that makes money nonetheless.

NYC is a big place, high-end Manhattan is but one segment. Her investment is not predicated on couch-surfing: I'm pretty sure she'll make out fine if prices only go up with inflation, and she'll do alright if they stay flat.

Hey Nada - on a somewhat related note, what do you think of the whole incognito v martin story?

Boo hoo. A big football player was bullied. Football players should have candy and flowers and rainbows and puppies.

Don't we have more important people to worry about. How about the autistic kid we still haven't found?

FC - that was response I was expecting from Nada. I was just doing a consistency check.

>> If you bought your house and it went up in value by $15 trillion or $15 thousand, and then back down, it didn't cost you any money, you didn't make any money, and no one else gained or lost, the economy didn't gain or lose because the value of your home went up and down or down and up.

That's true. I'll stop taunting if:

- All couch-surfers promise to not sell when the price goes up
- They acknowledge that they solely get joy from knowing their old couch is worth $15K more, but that it'll come back down when it comes time to sell
- They acknowledge that the $15K from AAPL will afford w67th a shinier couch

>All couch-surfers promise to not sell when the price goes up

oh ok, I'll start a petition and get everyone to swear.

>FC - that was response I was expecting from Nada. I was just doing a consistency check.

Great, now I'm inoitall.

>> Hey Nada - on a somewhat related note, what do you think of the whole incognito v martin story?

I have no clue what the incognito v martin story is. Did it start when someone called someone else a "homeless troll"?

>> oh ok, I'll start a petition and get everyone to swear.

You also need to unwind the sales from past couch-surfers, don't forget that.

great, not a problem.

BTW, do you consider the post below as taunting? (Posted before w67th made a single comment on this thread.)

Oxy>> That little grey "ignore this person" is very useful if you are disciplined enough not to read the comments anyway. This muppet has been on my "ignored" list for years.

Didn't Goldman Sachs get into trouble because someone there called a client/investor they were selling products to a "muppet"?

>Didn't Goldman Sachs get into trouble

Trouble? Some self-serving guy who couldn't get a promotion wrote an editorial that backfired on him (ping pong champion?) and became old news rather quickly. The newspaper that published the editorial figure out that it was taken advantage of. Trouble - no.

Nada - you seem to take insults to w67th personally. I also find it interesting that nobody other than you has claimed to know w67th's true identity.

C0C0 also takes insults to w67 personally.

>> Nada - you seem to take insults to w67th personally. I also find it interesting that nobody other than you has claimed to know w67th's true identity.

I'm not taking the insults personally. He gets taunted, he taunts back. But you only question his taunting above. On me claiming to be the only one to know w67th's true identity, you have a short memory. I distinctly remember at least one other person telling you they know him as well. Do you really think I would have made those comments above to you?

Who else told me they know w67th's identity? And no, I don't think you would make those comments to me. I have a friend who wrote a book; work of pure fiction; had some violence in it that disturbed mutual acquaintance. The violence did not phase me; it was a work of fiction.

One place I do taunt is on the tennis court. Just disgraceful, but admittedly fun. Context, however, is that I am not very good at tennis and only taunt those who are better than I am when I get a game here or there.

You never call someone "Perry Mason" when in court in a mocking tone?

@nada. I do believe Goldman salesmen in London may well have called w67th a muppet were he to be on their client list of "sophisticated" invetors. Is that your point?

Wasn't my style. I don't do trial work anymore. I did enjoy it, but it was all consuming and did, I admit, bring out the rather harsh side of my personality. When I was younger, I sometimes would write mocking nasty grams, but never sent them. I kept them in a little file called "had to be written; couldn't be sent."

Was there a time when w67th was not a taunter? Nada's post suggests that w67th was not the aggressor. The first post of this thread does not support that suggestion b/c this thread was initiated as response to w67th's quoted post. I would love for someone to revive an old thread that could show us newcomers an innocent w67th.

Oh, what a bunch of BS.:
to "wish" for: a bored, frustrated, angry, unemployable alkie housewife to "weigh in"?!

Wanting/:would love "for someone to revive an old thread that could show us newcomers an innocent w67th."?!
Believing that: "only one other person knows w67th's true identity"?!

Years ago, streeteasy made the mistake of hosting "SE get-togethers" where SE commenters threw-off their
anonymous nom de SE and drank the free booze, supplied by streeteasy. Others met "w67thstreet" there.
The SE alkies had a free-booze-pass, supplied by streeteasy.

streeteasy stopped hosting their "SE get-togethers" several years ago. They realized (much too late) that
the alkie comment-posters would take advantage of the chance to meet the other attendees.
I was too busy to attend. I wasn't interested in the free booze, nor did I have the time to waste.

I did receive many "invitations" from 10023 to attend "get-togethers/parties" at her apartment, where the SE alkies eagerly awaited me.
I was still too busy and suspicious of their over-eager invitations -- so I passed.
How lucky I was to miss meeting the bored, frustrated, unemployable housewife and A.H., the other alkie troll.

so...your point is that w67 is a real person seen by many other real people

and you were left out.

I don't understand why w67thstreet would have to be homeless when he could crash at his friend's place in C0lumbia C0unty.

that was clearly a goading comment.

but obviously i deserve it according to the groupie.

you deserve the best C0C0.

why?

because you are you. Isn't that reason enough?

what does that mean?

oh C0C0, your innocence really warms my heart.

so cute.

but what does it mean.

can the groupie shed any light on this?

C0C0, you are cute. So wrinkly and adorable!

as long as the groupie is happy, you're happy.

Nada gets me. 15trillion of sofa surfing. Some got lucky and sold, others will bleed it. No worries columbiacounty. Don't engage the field hamster. Her resume.

2007 to 2013. On line blogger.

Any other experiences?

A: of course. I trolled under various troll handles. Wtf? Do you think I'd waste my time under one handle? Plszzzzzzzzzzzzz.

Nada. Got a quick $25mm 4% cap govt funded old age home w67 is privileged take 50% equity in. Looks like 60x leveraged play. Non recourse. Looking I may have to take money off apple. Sometimes these special situations happen and he who is not 30x on a sofa with 100% of their net worth can pounce like a cat with a 24inch cock.

R u still at your old email?

No

^^within 30 seconds of my comment being posted above: "columbiacounty"^^ is posting whatever ridiculous
nonsense.

Although, for some reason: "aboutready" and "alanhart" were posting comments trying to convince me to respond to "c.c."'s (already in the grey-zone) comments, when I first started posting comments on SE.
I wasn't interested and posted comments clearly saying so.

"NYC10023"'s party invite list consisted of: "aboutready", "alanhart" and "lizyank".
"lizyank" had the misfortune to take "aboutready's" offer of legal help/advice ( offered by "aboutready", to be supplied by her lawyer husband). She needed the "free" advice and so gave up her personal privacy to "aboutready", who then took control of "lizyank"'s life (both her personal business and extending to forcing "lizyank" to supply her with "updates" and to accept "aboutready's career-advice.)

I spoke to "lizyank" (who was unemployed at that point for quite a long time.) She had marketing experience, so I referred her to a client's friend and got her a freelance job. "aboutready" demanded (and received) details about that job and then to ill-advise "lizyank" on how to proceed.
When Liz told me about her need to supply "aboutready" with the details/updates of her daily life, I had to
stop giving Liz referrals to clients. At least Liz was paid several-hundred dollars for the couple of hours of work she had started for the client. The client wasn't interested in continuing to work with Liz because he didn't want details of his business to be relayed to a bored, frustrated, unemployable alkie housewife.

"lizyank" then "left" SE, because she didn't want to (and realistically could not) take orders from "aboutready", forcing her to post comments on SE, claiming that I was not a publicist and all of the other "aboutready" drunken, resentful angry comments that "aboutready still continues to stew-and-spew to the present day.

obviously, you're right.

Um, truth, we never offered Lizyank legal advice. At one point I offered to help with your legal concerns, but thank the god I don't particularly believe in it never got that far, and I learned more than I wanted to about you before we met.

W67th never attended an advertised SE meet-up. Ever.

>> R u still at your old email?

Yep.

67 is what's known as a one (or two) trick pony. Doesn't he , anyway, live on an island far, far from NYC?

W67 is real, and he is my husband.

Inonada is my brother in law. About ready is my mother.

Nada - did I miss your answer to my question about which other poster told me they know w67th's true identity? I am genuinely curious b/c I have no recollection of that happening. Also, did you see the thread FC pulled that showed a kinder/gentler w67th from 4 years ago? W67th's tone and writing style in that thread is quite similar to Inonada's of present day.

FC - if you can pull an old thread in which Inonada and kinder/gentler w67th both participate, I might concede that they are not one and the same. Otherwise, I remain skeptical.

W67 can't be your husband. I am your father.

hmmn.

so then about ready isn't your mother in law but your wife?

C0C0 can't even resist trolling w67 and aboutready.

thats called having fun with friends.

not something you would now anything about.

stick with your groupie.

friends like you and I are friends.

i am not your friend.

apparently you don't have friends

what a surprise.

you aren't w67's friend or aboutready's friend either. When was the last time you had a meal or a drink with them?

you tell me.

you're obviously the expert.

but you think you are their friend.

but you have stated two posts above that you know better.

any evidence?

of course not

but you never have support for anything

stick with your groupie.

so now you are confused about your friendship?

not in the least.

well, its confirmed, you aren't their friend

as usual.

as usual.

so now this is where you going?

again?

where is it you've concluded I'm going?

too stupid.

gotta join everyone for dinner soon.

don't eat too late, that's how you gain weight.

are you overweight?

no, I don't eat too late

when did the take out guy show up for you?

oh, you have the wrong impression

how so?

please hurry.

need the bathroom?

no, you idiot.

i have to go to dinner.

with aboutready and w67thstreet?

Columbiacounty is my friend.... Go on field hamster. Go on.

>Columbiacounty is my friend.

I get it, I get it. And you are 100023's husband.

I bought sprint and apple. Was late to the party twice. Made money twice. Thanks w67. One thing for sure is that you know more stock picking than anyone else on this board. Period. I eagerly await your next recom and I will be in as soon as I read it next time. After sprint and apple I can afford to gamble on a SE poster :)

For the record, and yes this is on on w67 advice, in Sprint 5.4, out 7.08. In apple 4.4, out 66% high 4's, 33% still in.

Timeline both sub 6 months

Does this get me a ride on your boat with nada? I sail a lot.

>For the record, and yes this is on on w67 advice, in Sprint 5.4, out 7.08. In apple 4.4, out 66% high 4's, 33% still in.

You would have been better off buying Boeing on the day that w67 told you to buy Apple.

Gtat looks good to me. Looked better when I pulled 10k shares at $9.5 Friday.

Irdm also looks good. Maybe masa son wants to own an entire earth covering communication company for $450mm. $450mm to cover 70% of the earth the cell towers don't cover.

See a lot of boaters with iPhones with lifeproof cases.... But very few with sat phones. -shrug-

Field hamster ? Why are you comparing my cash position to Boeing? U wanna a random crazy stk I picked out awhile ago? DDD. Comparable to Boeing back then.

Gtat looks to give Corning a good run for their money. A material 2nd in hardness to diamonds with 1/20 the cost? I wonder what kind of applications a thin material that can be baked onto a structure to make it water, salt, rust, scratch proof be valued at?

Maybe I should bake my hull and rudder with that and eliminate the lead based paints in the world? Maybe a thin coating to make cars never need another paint job? How about on airplanes so that ice is harder to attach itself to? Opportunities abound if you have sex with real people and step out of your cat filled, dildo dungeon. U know whom I speak of.

w67: Boeing=DDD?

Hey nada. Sorry been crazy busy with that deal. It's mine to lose. Just wanna double chk with the SE free finance professor. Chk your gmail. I had to reboot it. It's been awhile since I logged on. :)

Interesting. Most people I know never check their mail, so they need to be reminded to do so.

Run along little child. Go play your troll games and world of witchcraft.

Us adults have some investing to do. On shit. Gtat is up 8% since my call. Two days ago. Flmaozz.

I'm about to sign a $25mm deal and ya just wanna keep pumping nyc re? Come onzzzzz. Stop playing with dildos. Get a real throbbing dick field hamster.

So where was this GTAT call?

Sorry, I didn't get an email from you; tried pinging you at the email I had for you. Lemme know if you didn't get that, and I can try to ping you through other channels (or vice-versa).

inoitall, the latest to be disappointed by w67 who says one thing and does another.

My bad nada. Sent with an old 'subject line'. Must be stuffed somewhere, but got your email and sent you a pic of me naked squatting 585lbs with a big screen shot of my Gtat and apple trade at etrade. :)

we are all green with envy

I only got half of promised email. Impressive.

See that, inoitall's expectations been lowered so much in context of w67 that thought he'd get nothing and is happy to settle for half of what was promised. Impressive

Even 1/2 of w67 impresses....

Nada. Does 300bps over 10yr treasury reset every 5th (15 yr term) sound expensive or mkt to you?

Which half? Your wife, the oncologist? The one who was "touched by thousands?"

wrong field... try again field hamster... Herrr Field Hamster

heil hamster.

w67th, iridium failed misreably a number of times. maybe they have improved their operating model, havent looked at in awhile. but the concept is first rate and the asset values of their satelites alone are probably worth at least half of that valuation.