Skip Navigation
StreetEasy Logo

building at 35 SUTTON PLACE

Started by anonymous
about 19 years ago
Posts: 8501
Member since: Feb 2006
(Discussing building at 35 SUTTON PLACE) Hideous, dictatorial board. Nasty, elitist.
Response by Clambar
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 2
Member since: Jan 2011

Anyone care to comment or provide clarification on above re: board?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by ANDYOH
over 13 years ago
Posts: 23
Member since: Nov 2009

does anyone have any recent experience with the bldg, board, service or anything else? we are looking at a two bedroom in the bldg

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by ANDYOH
over 13 years ago
Posts: 23
Member since: Nov 2009

is the bldg construction over and was there an assessment?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by huntersburg
over 13 years ago
Posts: 11329
Member since: Nov 2010

Brooks2/caonima/Al_assad/Str33teasier - any comments? We know you like to follow the area.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by falcogold1
about 13 years ago
Posts: 4159
Member since: Sep 2008

What is the story of this building?
Any insights from the SE pool?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
about 13 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

It's one where Google Maps says a lot. Note where almost all the brick on the Sutton Place facade had to be replaced, and all the greenhouses the co-op let shareholders put on the setbacks and roof.

There's a current lawsuit, with the co-op suing its former board president. Some mess about whether her greenhouses are causing massive leaks to the apartment below. Dueling engineers, and on and on.

It's index 150271/2012 on eCourts, with lots of exhibits, if you're got some time.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by generalogoun
about 13 years ago
Posts: 329
Member since: Jan 2009

NWT, how I admire your knowledge of this area of the law, which is not mine. I always enjoy reading the cases. Thanks for sharing and for all your insight.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Truth
about 13 years ago
Posts: 5641
Member since: Dec 2009

I love NWT. He's the best!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by liamae18
about 13 years ago
Posts: 24
Member since: May 2011

hate the neighborhood

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
over 10 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

It never ends. Now the board VP is accused of, uh, losing a shareholder's proxy for last month's election. The petition says the VP would've not been reelected had the proxy been counted. The court issued an order to show cause why the election shouldn't be done over.

https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/fbem/DocumentDisplayServlet?documentId=qiUHWZeQYpfIsI/UXVlRyQ==&system=prod

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by multicityresident
almost 5 years ago
Posts: 2421
Member since: Jan 2009

Can anyone get NWT back on SE? All the interesting listings at this building lead me to finally read previous discussions. Talk about coop drama; what on earth is wrong with these entrenched boards?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by RichardBerg
almost 5 years ago
Posts: 325
Member since: Aug 2010

Juicy stuff: the VP opens the biggest shareholder's proxy vote, shakes his head in disbelief, and "accidentally" discards it. Little did he know the petitioners had an NYPD detective reviewing the security camera. Oops.

https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/fbem/DocumentDisplayServlet?documentId=qL_PLUS_nQ2c6969ultlGcRBPnA==&system=prod

No lawsuits in the system since then, though.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by multicityresident
almost 5 years ago
Posts: 2421
Member since: Jan 2009

I wonder if that super is still in place and whether Bell and Heisler are currently on the board. The building does look like it has interesting apartments; it would be great if this turned out to be a story where active shareholders took control of their building and were able to reform it.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by ph41
almost 5 years ago
Posts: 3390
Member since: Feb 2008

Looking at the recent sale history of PHD makes me think there are still major problems with this building

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by GTS
almost 5 years ago
Posts: 0
Member since: Jul 2012

I live in this building. A new board took over 5 years ago, implemented term limits and turned things around. The building is very well run, with a great deal of transparency. The apartments facing the river have stunning views but might be in estate condition so, something to consider if you don't want to deal with renovations/updates. I hear from new residents that the application process and board interview were very reasonable.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment