Skip Navigation
StreetEasy Logo

Market Rate and Affordable Mixed Co-op Allocation

Started by pier45
about 11 years ago
Posts: 379
Member since: May 2009
Discussion about
In buildings where co-op units are sold as market-rate alongside affordable, are the affordable units generally sold or rented? If sold, how do they allocate shares? Do the market rate units perpetually subsidize the affordable based on allocation? Here is an example of the type of building in mind: http://therealdeal.com/blog/2014/09/11/rendering-revealed-for-extells-68-charlton-place/
Response by REMom
about 11 years ago
Posts: 307
Member since: Apr 2009

I'm not aware of buildings with market and affordable rate units for sale. Brand new construction with both are rental. Existing building with both that convert to condo or co-op usually have a non-eviction plan so that rent controlled and stabilized tenants are permitted to stay if they choose not to buy.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by REMom
about 11 years ago
Posts: 307
Member since: Apr 2009

For the rent stabilized/controlled units in a building that has units for sale, the sponsor would be responsible for the maintenance based on whatever allocation was determined at conversion.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by alanhart
about 11 years ago
Posts: 12397
Member since: Feb 2007

This has a better explanation: http://therealdeal.com/blog/2014/02/28/extell-plans-hudson-square-project-with-affordable-housing/

The general idea is that the market-rate cooperators don't subsidize the affordable-rate renters ... instead, the tax breaks and higher-floor taller-building allowance made possible by having affordable rental units wind up subsidizing the market-rate cooperators.

REMom's explanation might be how it works technically for this Hudson Square new-construction building, with the sponsor paying maintenance for each affordable rental unit.

All of which is the only explanation I can think of for it being a cooperative and not a condominium. Unless it's a landlease.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by alanhart
about 11 years ago
Posts: 12397
Member since: Feb 2007

Trinity Chuch, or the Episcopal Diocese of New York, or something like that, owns massive amounts of land in that area, so landlease might indeed be what's happened. Although I'd think it would be widely reported. I'm too lazy to look. NWT?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
about 11 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

Right, it's a land lease, but the landlord isn't the diocese. It's an LLC whose care-of person is a member of the family that's owned it since at least 1966. She lives in Lincoln Towers.

The lease is for 157 years, ending in 2163.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment

Most popular

  1. 33 Comments
  2. 35 Comments
  3. 25 Comments
  4. 25 Comments