Skip Navigation
StreetEasy Logo

Coronado

Started by mjschobel_1210125
almost 8 years ago
Posts: 0
Member since: Apr 2012
Anyone know anything about this building? It's surprising that there's no discussion yet.
Response by steve123
over 1 year ago
Posts: 895
Member since: Feb 2009

Curious why this unit traded sideways for 22 years?
https://streeteasy.com/building/coronado-condominium/10c

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by nyc_sport
over 1 year ago
Posts: 809
Member since: Jan 2009

That may be the funniest mis-filing ever. If you look at the 2001 sale, the price is entirely out of step with all other sale pricing in the building. Why? Because it was for 155 EAST 78th St. (and, apartment 15B).

https://a836-acris.nyc.gov/DS/DocumentSearch/DocumentImageView?doc_id=FT_1440007537044

But it has traded sideways for 10 years

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Rinette
over 1 year ago
Posts: 645
Member since: Dec 2016
Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by inonada
over 1 year ago
Posts: 7934
Member since: Oct 2008
Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by inonada
over 1 year ago
Posts: 7934
Member since: Oct 2008

Buyers paid $5.2M for the two units in 2007 and then spent whatever ($1-2m?) combo-ing it:

https://a836-acris.nyc.gov/DS/DocumentSearch/DocumentDetail?doc_id=2007012201465002

https://a836-acris.nyc.gov/DS/DocumentSearch/DocumentDetail?doc_id=2007012200516002

IMO, combo & design seems dated and incoherent — the owners didn’t seem very good at this. Perhaps the owners agree, which is why they simply bought something else downstairs rather than start afresh:

https://streeteasy.com/building/coronado-condominium/6bc

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Aaron2
over 1 year ago
Posts: 1693
Member since: Mar 2012

I wonder why the rental broker went to all the effort to fuzz out the views (which aren't well done and is more distracting than just leaving them alone)? The views apparently didn't bother the selling broker.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Aaron2
over 1 year ago
Posts: 1693
Member since: Mar 2012

And at least in 6BC they got a proper foyer. And only 1 public room, which is unfortunate.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by inonada
over 1 year ago
Posts: 7934
Member since: Oct 2008

Yeah, the blurring of the views is weird.

I think the bones of the PH are vastly superior. The ceiling height just doesn’t support one large expanse, and they would have done better using the pillars at the expansive windows to divide the space with walls.

I can imagine the change was spurred by age and not being able to navigate the stairs anymore. (This seems like a pied a terre from the addresses and the occupants’ residency.)

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment

Most popular

  1. 33 Comments
  2. 35 Comments
  3. 25 Comments
  4. 25 Comments