Skip Navigation

bankrupt: Viridian condos in Greenpoint

Started by GraffitiGrammarian
about 17 years ago
Posts: 687
Member since: Jul 2008
Discussion about
There's a story in an industry newsletter today about "the troubled Viridian complex" in Greenpoint. I can't copy it here, sorry, nor is there a link for it. Here is the background info on the complex: http://www.streeteasy.com/nyc/building/110-green-street-brooklyn The story says: the owners, known as 110 Green Stret LLC, filed for bankruptcy earlier this month. Now brokers at Marcus & Millichap are trying to sell the property with an asking price of $65mm, although it could sell for less.
Response by bjw2103
about 17 years ago
Posts: 6236
Member since: Jul 2007

This isn't all that surprising. From what I could tell, the project actually looked halfway decent and the location isn't bad, but pushing condos in this (pretty old school) neighborhood was a gamble at this point, especially since they started sales as late as they did. Everything was just working against them at that point. It seemed a lot like some of the condo troubles in Carroll Gardens. Maybe one day West and Franklin Streets will be thriving and modern throughways (and Franklin is a lovely street as is, just not in the way developers like this would want), but the timing was just plain bad here.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by mutombonyc
about 17 years ago
Posts: 2468
Member since: Dec 2008

pushing condos in a lot of "up and coming" neighborhoods was a gamble. What is the clinical definition of a condo? I feel its a word used to loosely because of the clout that comes with it.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by bjw2103
about 17 years ago
Posts: 6236
Member since: Jul 2007

mutombo,

I agree. Some of those gambles worked (especially if they started sales well before 2008), and some haven't. We'll see more of the latter in the next few months for sure. Not sure what you mean by "clinical" definition, but condos are pretty self-evident: you pay for the actual property (unlike co-ops, where you're technically buying shares proportionate to the size of the apartment in question) in an apartment building, pay real estate taxes separately from common charges (again, unlike a co-op, where they're technically included in your monthlies, and why a portion of your maintenance is tax deductible), and pay a relative share of the building's common charges each month (just as you would in a co-op). I don't think there's any inherent clout in the word; condos are quite prevalent in pretty much every other city in this country. The co-op concept is relatively unique to New York.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by mutombonyc
about 17 years ago
Posts: 2468
Member since: Dec 2008

bjw2103,

On CL and across the boards, there are ads that read condos for rent can an individual pay rent on a condo? Can you sublease a condo? If I rent at The Edge, not the affordable housing part the part that was slated to be condos, can I call that apt a condo? This is where I say the word condo is used too loosely and this is where the clout when you say condo comes in to play as you defined in you response.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by bjw2103
about 17 years ago
Posts: 6236
Member since: Jul 2007

mutombo,

Of course you can rent a condo. You can rent a co-op too. I don't mean this as a knock, but I really think you need to educate yourself quite a bit more about real estate before you make some of the statements you make (see the other thread on the rental foreclosure). These are fairly basic concepts.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by mutombonyc
about 17 years ago
Posts: 2468
Member since: Dec 2008

So anyone can say they have a condo even though they are paying rent on a condo?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by mutombonyc
about 17 years ago
Posts: 2468
Member since: Dec 2008

what is the difference between mortgage and rent?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by bjw2103
about 17 years ago
Posts: 6236
Member since: Jul 2007

Yes, you can say you're renting a condo.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by mutombonyc
about 17 years ago
Posts: 2468
Member since: Dec 2008

so if you rent a condo you don't pay taxes you don't pay common charges am I correct?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by bjw2103
about 17 years ago
Posts: 6236
Member since: Jul 2007

mutombo,

If you're trying to pull my leg, congrats, but I strongly suggest you do some basic reading on real estate if you're asking these kinds of questions. When you rent, you just pay rent (whatever price you and the landlord agree upon); when you own, you pay your mortgage, common charges, and taxes. The rent or own decision has no impact on whether you call something a condo/co-op or not.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by mutombonyc
about 17 years ago
Posts: 2468
Member since: Dec 2008

bjw2103, i'm serious today

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by mutombonyc
about 17 years ago
Posts: 2468
Member since: Dec 2008

bjw2103, i totally disagree with you and feel you are 100% incorrect in your response.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by bjw2103
about 17 years ago
Posts: 6236
Member since: Jul 2007

Well, you got me, what can I say? That's what I get for trying to be helpful! Please troll elsewhere.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by mutombonyc
about 17 years ago
Posts: 2468
Member since: Dec 2008

bjw2103, according to your answer theres no divide between a renter, condo and a co-op.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by ncy10025
about 17 years ago
Posts: 198
Member since: Feb 2009

muto... you can rent a condo or coop from the owner of said condo or coop providing the coop and or condo rules allow the owner to sublet. The rent you pay is what rent the owner of the coop or condo is asking for. Usually the owner wants the rent on the coop or condo to cover their mortgage/maintenance and taxes.

You don't pay taxes on a rental of any type located anywhere -- same with maintenance fees.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by julia
about 17 years ago
Posts: 2841
Member since: Feb 2007

In Miami condos weren't selling and monthly fees weren't being paid so every day services kept getting worse for the people that were living there..their monthly fees went up but it still didn't change. it's very tough.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by mutombonyc
about 17 years ago
Posts: 2468
Member since: Dec 2008

ncy10025,

thnx for your insight.

ok, i got you. you are not an owner of a condo/co-op you would be renting in a condo/co-op paying someone else mortgage/taxes/cc and following the rules of that building providing you are permitted to sublet there. A new development that was slated to be condos but due to the economy they are turning into a rental development can a renter there call there dwelling a condo? i.e. Northside Piers.

I know you don't pay taxes and cc & mf on rentals.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by aboutready
about 17 years ago
Posts: 16354
Member since: Oct 2007

The developer of 5th on the Park in Harlem just went into bankruptcy proceedings.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by mutombonyc
about 17 years ago
Posts: 2468
Member since: Dec 2008

Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by bjw2103
about 17 years ago
Posts: 6236
Member since: Jul 2007

"can a renter there call there [sic] dwelling a condo?"

No, mutombo, you'd have to call it a rondo. Given your line of work, you should be familiar: http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/players/profile?playerId=3026

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by mutombonyc
about 17 years ago
Posts: 2468
Member since: Dec 2008

Real cute willie.

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment

Most popular

  1. 16 Comments
  2. 13 Comments
  3. 20 Comments