Skip Navigation

Management being A-Holes about the rooftop use

Started by awilda429
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 1
Member since: Aug 2012
Discussion about
Moved to a brand new contruction Feb 2012 in Williamsburg and the management has been such a pain. The Building has amenities, such as Rooftop deck, gym and theather room. The rooftop did not open until August since they were not done with it. In the lease, there were no restrictions with using those amenities. When the rooftop finally opened, they asked us to sign a contract which states that if... [more]
Response by somewhereelse
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 7435
Member since: Oct 2009

Why did you sign the second agreement?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by awilda429
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 1
Member since: Aug 2012

Well they wouldn't give our key card access to the roof unless we signed the first contract. not much we could do and also I didnt expect a 3rd contract to be sent later.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by jason10006
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 5257
Member since: Jan 2009

You should not have signed the separate agreements. you lose. {said like Mickey Rourke in Iron man 2.)

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Triple_Zero
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 516
Member since: Apr 2012

"You should not have signed the separate agreements. you lose."

...you get *nothing*! Good day! (said like Willy Wonka)

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by walpurgis
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 593
Member since: Feb 2009

As with most all building boards, their ideal tenant would be Ann Frank & her family - that is of course, until they dare to breath to loudly.

Our roof deck (admittedly very, very nice & well kept) has a bright red sign, approximately 24"h x 16" w, with no less than 15 "NO"s listed.

Essentially, you have to sit up their like a mannequin - & that's it. What fun!

They haven't asked for any security deposit (not yet, anyway) but it in no way would surprise me.

Just the idea that they'd ask for one is extremely insulting, especially when one has to pass a number of criteria to live there to begin with. To me, it shows either how paranoid these boards or managers are, & worse, how they don't trust their own residents. UTTERLY DISGUSTING!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by walpurgis
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 593
Member since: Feb 2009

P.S: Although this may be stating the obvious, the primary reason the roof deck is in such good shape is simple: HARDLY ANYONE USES IT!
(They don't dare!) But seriously, the rules, a small percentage of them sensible but the majority beyond absurd, is obviously a big deterrent.
It's probably eating our board up alive that there's no one to send a warning letter to about rule infractions!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

How do buildings monitor roof-deck usage and enforce rules?

I ask because some of my co-op's board members want to build one. The idea is that other co-ops in the neighborhood have them, "we need an amenity to compete," and the porters will keep it tidy, hose off the the furniture, etc., in their spare time.

Was the deck a factor in your choosing your building?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by huntersburg
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 11329
Member since: Nov 2010

>How do buildings monitor roof-deck usage

drones

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by NWT
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 6643
Member since: Sep 2008

That wouldn't surprise me. We already have TV cameras in the freight elevator, laundry room, etc.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by walpurgis
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 593
Member since: Feb 2009

Drones...now THAT'S a good one!

We already have cameras pretty much everywhere, except the hallways & stairwells, but its probably only a matter of time before we do.

With roofdeck rules enough to make one jump, the best thing would be the simple installation of a diving board.

Stay tuned for the inevitable Estate sales...

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by walpurgis
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 593
Member since: Feb 2009

Or if drones are prohibitively expensive, a more economic alternative would be to attach jetpacks to the multitudinous yentas that every building seems to have.

They'd sign up faster than their gossip spreads - if that's even possible.

I can easily envision them flying around & hovering over the deck, while excitedly yacking to one another, pointing their witch-like, liver spotted fingers at the "violators".

Afterwards, they apply lipstick liberally, in preparation for the kissing of the board's *** when they report back with their findings.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by Ottawanyc
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 842
Member since: Aug 2011

I don't think that second thing was a contract. Was it an addendum or something to your contract? For a contract both parties need to get something; besides getting screwed (sorry, couldn't resist).

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by lad
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 707
Member since: Apr 2009

A lot of rental buildings limit you to one guest and/or make you pay nonrefundable $300-500 fees to have any kind of gathering on the roof. The agreements you're being asked to sign don't seem all that bad in comparison.

Walpurgis, what are these crazy rules?

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by hoodia
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 154
Member since: Jun 2009

All of this is part of the bubble, following colleges and their expensive facilities.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by walpurgis
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 593
Member since: Feb 2009

. No cell phones
. No radios without headsets
. No food
. No smoking
. No glass containers
. No loud talking (late night; the deck went 24/7)
. No going beyond deck boundaries to the asphalt roof sections
. No ball or Frisbee throwing
. No pets
. No personal belongings can be kept on deck
. No personal furniture
. No more than two guests per shareholder at any one time
. No children without unless accompanied by an adult
. No unauthorized use of any building equipment
. No touching of plantings

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by bramstar
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 1909
Member since: May 2008

What's the problem with having to put down a security deposit for a large gathering in a common area? That seems pretty standard to me. You'll get the money back as long as nothing is damaged.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by buster2056
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 866
Member since: Sep 2007

Walpurgis, those all sound like perfectly reasonable and wonderful rules. A roof deck is common space, and the rules allow it to be enjoyed by all.

Awilda, regarding asking permission for gatherings and leaving a deposit: you should be happy management is allowing you to hold gatherings at all (see walpurgis's rule #12). A deposit seems like a great idea to ensure your guests don't damage or trash the terrace. It's amazing how otherwise tidy, responsible adults will suddenly shirk cleaning responsibilities when a party is hosted in common space... It's so much easier to leave those empty wine bottles lingering by the trash can, cigarettes stubbed out in planters, empty cups strewn about for the building staff to clean while you nurse a hangover in the comfort and privacy of your bedroom.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by walpurgis
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 593
Member since: Feb 2009

I just feel that anyone with common sense would already be cognizant if these things, but I guess better safe than sorry.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by caonima
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 815
Member since: Apr 2010

walpurgis, looks like shareholders can hang and dry their clothes/quills/sheets on your rooftop

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by blah_blah_blah
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 0
Member since: Jul 2009

My roof deck in battery park is really nice. They have about 10 rules, one is no smoking. The roof burnt down and subsequently was closed for 6 months because some put their cigarette out in a planter. Notes had been sent around following a near miss the previous season. Some rules are there for a reason

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by somewhereelse
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 7435
Member since: Oct 2009

"Walpurgis, those all sound like perfectly reasonable and wonderful rules. A roof deck is common space, and the rules allow it to be enjoyed by all."

Agreed. There are *always* a**holes to ruin it all, and at least this gives a little ammo to take care of major problems (by nipping at the minor ones). Some of these are blatantly obvious... no radio playing, of course. No bringing 10 friends, of course, then they dominate the roof, and others can't enjoy. Food, smoking, glass, anyone want to argue? Kids need supervision... of course, it is a ROOF.

It is a *common* area. There seem to always be folks in every situation willing to do things that will obviously make it harder for others to enjoy. I love when they throw idiots out for texting during the movies.

Yes, it is NYC, but this is private property... keep out the idiots...

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by somewhereelse
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 7435
Member since: Oct 2009

BTW, if you are throwing a party on property with potential for damage (including things being thrown off roof), a security deposit is not crazy. Play by the rules, get it back.

If you are worried about losing it, perhaps it is you the neighbors should be worried about.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by walpurgis
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 593
Member since: Feb 2009

Agreed.

Gotta run now...I have to get my "quills"!

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by West34
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 1040
Member since: Mar 2009

. No cell phones (VAGUE - should say no TALKING on cell phone)
. No radios without headsets (VERY Reasonable)
. No food (STUPID RULE! - eating your pizza or Chinese delivery on the roof is the whole point!)
. No smoking (VERY Reasonable)
. No glass containers (Reasonable)
. No loud talking (late night; the deck went 24/7) (Reasonable)
. No going beyond deck boundaries to the asphalt roof sections (Reasonable)
. No ball or Frisbee throwing (Reasonable)
. No pets (VERY Reasonable)
. No personal belongings can be kept on deck (Reasonable)
. No personal furniture (Reasonable)
. No more than two guests per shareholder at any one time (Reasonable)
. No children without unless accompanied by an adult (VERY Reasonable)
. No unauthorized use of any building equipment (Reasonable)
. No touching of plantings (Reasonable - if everyone took a sprig of mint....)

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by kNA
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 67
Member since: Mar 2010

I don't see why pets (so long as they're on leash or on your lap, not urinating/defecating, and being watched vigilantly) can't be allowed on a building rooftop.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by West34
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 1040
Member since: Mar 2009

Re: I don't see why pets (so long as they're on leash or on your lap, not urinating/defecating, and being watched vigilantly) can't be allowed on a building rooftop.

Because pets slobber, bark, shed, sniff around, piss, shit, reek, bite and knock things over. And just because you love your pet, don't ever forget that most of us hate your pet.

Ignored comment. Unhide
Response by huntersburg
almost 14 years ago
Posts: 11329
Member since: Nov 2010

West34 +1

Ignored comment. Unhide

Add Your Comment